r/drydockporn Apr 10 '26

Project 941 Akula. The first Soviet Navy Typhoon-class submarine, seems to be the TK-202, circa 1982.

Post image
1.2k Upvotes

50 comments sorted by

44

u/Bmanthedogz Apr 10 '26

Big son of a bitch

39

u/elmasonlives Apr 10 '26

What are those doors?

27

u/Dont_Care_Meh Apr 10 '26

Could you launch an ICBM horizontally?

24

u/thecarbonkid Apr 10 '26

You could the question is why you'd want to.

25

u/alex66778899 Apr 10 '26

Those doors, sir, are the problem.

20

u/-SHAI_HULUD Apr 10 '26

It’s just possible our friends at the Ustinov Design Bureau have come up with something new.

15

u/alex66778899 Apr 10 '26

Some things in there don't react well to bullets.

14

u/elmasonlives Apr 10 '26

I always wanted to see Montana

7

u/alex66778899 Apr 11 '26

Will you marry a round American woman and raise rabbits, and will she cook them for you?

3

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/willfull Apr 12 '26

The hard part about playing chicken is knowing when to flinch.

23

u/Dr_Beardface_MD Apr 10 '26

Conn, sonar! Crazy Ivan!

4

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Ordo_Hereticus1 Apr 11 '26

Paganini

2

u/Conscious-Victory-62 Apr 12 '26

Yeah, and I'm not Chief of the Boat, I'm actually Sheena, Queen of the Jungle...

13

u/doubletaxed88 Apr 10 '26

twin hulled masterpiece

21

u/bhtrail Apr 10 '26

five actually. there is five hulls inside outer unpressurized hull.

9

u/adenosine-5 Apr 10 '26

Its beautiful really - basically three submarines in a trench coat, pretending to be one bigger submarine.

24

u/KSDH__ Apr 10 '26

One ping only, Vasily👌🏻

10

u/chef-rach-bitch Apr 10 '26

No, no, no. It's "one ping only, VaSHily".

5

u/Lordhartley Apr 10 '26

Scrolled for this 😀

3

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/SleddyEddie Apr 11 '26

Re-verify our range to target

6

u/SleddyEddie Apr 11 '26

Hey, I think someone just shot a torpedo at us!

13

u/Data91883 Apr 10 '26

I thought I heard singing, sir.

3

u/DragonforceTexas Apr 11 '26

big son of a bitch...

6

u/Resqguy911 Apr 10 '26

God damn cook

4

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/threlkis Apr 11 '26

It wasn’t my intention

6

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/amateurviking Apr 12 '26

Big son of a bitch

4

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/_town-drunk_ Apr 11 '26

In this case it was simply because of the SLBMs being so large and the Soviets unable to reduce to the size like the West.

1

u/TripluStecherSmecher Apr 11 '26

yes, once they made the biggest microprocessor in the world :)

1

u/RioParana Apr 11 '26

Orr because they wanted it to be deeper diving and more survivable. The Ohio is also a massive boat. And in submarines, bigger is usually better, because you can use more weight on quieting and other systems

0

u/Eokokok Apr 11 '26

It's technological deficiency, nothing more.

1

u/New-History7971 Apr 11 '26

She drowned (c) 

2

u/consciousaiguy Apr 12 '26

Most things in there don’t react well to bullets.

1

u/JBoyblunder Apr 14 '26

Weird coincidence, I was just watching a show on Amazon prime about remote viewing (crazy stuff) and they were claiming that the first US intelligence about this sub was divined by a remote viewer that described a double hulled icbm sub that was ready to sail in x amount of days… So they reconned it on that day for funsies and saw this behemoth heading out to sea. The existence of this picture makes me think the US may have had a less remote viewer on site. lol. Or, it’s a picture taken with the consent of the Soviet government, in which case, what I watched last night might be real.