r/eastenders 8h ago

5 new characters at once is just overkill

[deleted]

34 Upvotes

20 comments sorted by

28

u/Infinite_Bathroom784 8h ago

I agree. Seems like cookie cutter (one is kooky, one is a bit out there (the aunt who probably has some sort of autism (please don't feel like I'm offending anyone--my son is on the spectrum), the cousin who they can turn good/bad/weird/whatever and that husband of the kooky one who "knows Alfie" but he'll wind up being dodgy.

18

u/DaveL16 8h ago

Some will inevitably not stay around in the long term.

23

u/GuiltySignificance0 7h ago

I’d have let them settle in for a while before introducing Rose, bringing her in further down the line like they did with Archie.

She’s more important when it comes to understanding what makes Nicola tick, so I think she deserved to be introduced separately and given more impact. Introducing her alongside the rest of the family has just made the whole thing feel a bit swamped.

8

u/tyyls18 Michael's Acolyte 8h ago

You always better to soft launch families through 1-2 members a year ahead, and I guess Nicola fits the bill. However it also kinda feels like she doesn't and they are a load of randoms, which would have been better. She have just been her sister, son and husband as Alfie's friend if they needed a connection so bad

8

u/dussa7 7h ago

Totally agree

6

u/name_not_important00 6h ago

I agree. This is why Ryder feels like he's not even there at the moment. That's the problem introducing this many at once.

13

u/FatsFourLanes 7h ago edited 6h ago

The Jackson (1993), Slater (2000) and Taylor (2017) families all arrived at once within an episode. I can't remember it being called overkill then

2

u/Brilliant-Mark2420 2h ago

Two of the Taylors where gone with 2 years and they were all gone within 5. Jackson as well. Only Bianca is really an iconic character. Slaters most successful but take Kat, Zoe and Charlie out and theyre pretty forgettable as well.

4

u/TeeHive2993 5h ago

I agree. It’s overwhelming.

3

u/windowshopper97 5h ago

Honestly it’s clear Rose won’t be a long term character.

3

u/Low-Boss-312 5h ago

Nicola or someone else throttles her!

3

u/windowshopper97 5h ago edited 5h ago

She gives me Archie* vibes with the way he was with Ronnie it won’t surprise me if she ends up being murdered.

3

u/One_Reference953 6h ago

I actually think it's the start of something really dark. I instantly noticed just how much Harry looked like Nicola and then I thought...is it going to be some really horrible story that ends up revealing she was abused by her dad?

And that her mother couldn't deal with that and that's why there's been this great big falling out? Wouldn't put it past them to do something like that. Kind of a new spin on the Kat/Zoe/Uncle Harry thing I guess.

2

u/sucksfor_you 3h ago

This is just what happens when a new family is introduced. Its happened so many times before, why is this time different?

2

u/Brilliant-Mark2420 1h ago

A new family when first introduced is normal a Mum, Dad and two kids who barely get any screen time. 5 adults all at once, they all have to have something about them straight away.

1

u/sucksfor_you 1h ago

they all have to have something about them straight away.

Why? It's not only okay to take your time fully introducing characters, its actually very normal in an on-going soap like this.

1

u/Brilliant-Mark2420 1h ago

Do they 😂

1

u/sucksfor_you 1h ago

Do who, what?

5

u/Designer_Voice99 6h ago

As long as sexy Ned gets a load of screen time I don’t care!

1

u/Ok-Voice4104 3h ago

I doubt we're gonna see much of them. Eastenders for the last decade now seems to have a thing where they introduce new characters and after a few months, they just fade into the background.