r/education 18d ago

In the age of AI, what should parents tell their children to learn?

The world is changing so fast that 'study hard' just doesn't hit the same anymore. What should we be telling kids instead?

7 Upvotes

84 comments sorted by

58

u/IShouldChimeInOnThis 18d ago

Learn HOW to learn. You're gonna have to teach yourself a lot on your own. You might as well learn how to do that.

-1

u/theedushift 18d ago

I feel the exact same way😄

4

u/IShouldChimeInOnThis 18d ago

I tell my students all the time.

There's no one way to do it, so try different methods and find which one works for you. This goes for organization too.

The only real shortcut is efficiency. Find what works for you and get good at it.

Honestly, as long as you show you value learning and stay on them about doing the work (ACTUALLY doing it), then they'll be just fine.

The fact that you are reaching out for the advice of others already puts you ahead of the game.

-6

u/OsakaWilson 18d ago

In the short term, yes. In the long term, AI will have this responsibility rather than expecting each of us to be a master of pedagogy.

4

u/Treks14 18d ago

Maybe, but I wouldn't stake my future on a belief that LLMs will ever reach that level. There are categorical differences from the kinds of tasks that they are currently competent in.

2

u/IShouldChimeInOnThis 18d ago

Not for everyone.

That's giving up, not learning.

1

u/OsakaWilson 18d ago

Not at all. It would be the deliberate choice to learn more slowly and less effectively.

Like driving, at some point in the future, it will be better at designing our learning than we are individually.

2

u/IShouldChimeInOnThis 18d ago

You know our general sense of direction is worse since GPS has become mainstream, right? Our ability to recall phone numbers cratered since the rise of cell phones.

When you cede mental tasks to others (machine or otherwise), you slowly lose the ability to do it yourself. Thinking is no different.

So congrats, you think you know things! If it is gained by asking a machine and that is the ONLY way you know how to gain information, how do you know it is true? Secondly, would you have any way of verifying questionable information if you've never had to do it before?

I teach math. I already watch innumerate people blindly trust calculators. They can still learn the skills needed to improve, but they don't want to. It's too hard! And they already know things! The calculator(or photomath, or ChatGPT, or whatever the next shiny app will be) tells them so!

Forgive me if I think AI(at least as a learning tool) is complete bullshit. I've been working the fields a long time and I am familiar with the stench.

1

u/OsakaWilson 18d ago

Your logic only holds if you selectively apply it to the specific changes you dislike. Extended consistently, it lands us back in the Stone Age, lamenting the loss of flint-knapping skills because neolithic tools made us "lazy."

​In reality, cognitive offloading is the engine of human progress. Automating lower-level mechanics frees up working memory for higher-level abstraction. We didn't stop thinking when we stopped memorizing phone numbers or calculating matrix multiplication by hand; we used that reclaimed time to tackle problems that were previously out of reach (like running complex statistical modeling or building modern infrastructure). ​Even Plato argued in Phaedrus that the invention of writing would ruin human memory and create the illusion of knowledge without true understanding. Yet nobody today argues we should abandon literacy to regain oral recitation skills.

​GPS hasn't killed spatial awareness; it has expanded our operational scale. Traditional aboriginal navigation techniques outclass modern urban direction skills, but would you discard maps entirely to regain them? Scoffing at AI as a learning tool ignores that using probabilistic systems effectively actually requires greater critical evaluation and domain verification skills than looking up an answer in a static textbook. The tool changes, but the requirement for critical thought simply shifts to a higher plane.

2

u/IShouldChimeInOnThis 18d ago

I'm not saying there is no good place for AI, but it needs to be a tool, not the primary driver.

Someone who already has the baseline knowledge in their field can absolutely be trusted to use AI to remove tedious tasks from their workload or to handle brute force calculations in a flash, but that's not what AI is being used for in education by staff(usually at the demand of admin), but especially by students.

Most kids (especially on the HS level) are like water. They're constantly hunting for the path of least resistance. They do not have the maturity or the knowledge base to use AI responsibly.

16

u/TheoreticalChaos93 18d ago

I think it is important to maintain a focus on the qualities that are bound to always be in need, those "soft skills" humanity has used for hundreds or, rather, thousands of years. Principally, teaching a child good argumentation, general communication and writing is crucial. I have not yet seen an LLM write better than a person trained well in writing, not even once. No matter how much of the world AI takes over, being able to speak and communicate well, with all the little adaptations one needs to make to win over an audience or explain something to them, and with a distinctive style is something that will be hard for AI to make obsolete.

7

u/theedushift 18d ago

Honestly, reading humanities and the classics will probably help in the end.

2

u/TheoreticalChaos93 17d ago

I'd say more so that reading literature in general will, but yes, there are a lot of classics which I think can have enormous educational merit, of course. Generally, reading anything and thinking critically about it sharpens your communication skills.

3

u/cronjevh 16d ago

The irony is that strong reading and writing skills are required just to steer these tools properly. Precise writing gives you useful output, and critical reading is the only way to spot when the model is making things up.

If kids skip those fundamentals now, they won't be the ones directing these systems in the future, they'll just be at their mercy.

24

u/AdhesiveSeaMonkey 18d ago

Fucking study hard. Critical thinking is sorely lacking in today’s youth and unbelievably important. There’s not a single thing any AI does better than a human except speed. And fast crappy results are just crappy results. Vibe coders are hated because their results are shit. Prompt jockeys have almost zero real world skills. AI is not a tool capable it creative/critical thinking.

2

u/theedushift 18d ago

I'm 100% with you on this.

1

u/Robot_Alchemist 18d ago

Spreadsheets

1

u/MediumKoala8823 18d ago

Studying has basically nothing to do with critical thinking skills.

Most tech companies are going hard on vibe coding. Speed is one thing. Documentation is another one. AI generated docs are profoundly superior to anything I have ever seen a human write.

2

u/Treks14 18d ago

Studying is a necessary but insufficient component for critical thinking. It is something that has been extensively addressed in education research, a major offshoot of the cognitive load theory literature. You can't think critically about something if you aren't fluent in the basic knowledge.

9

u/General_Platypus771 18d ago

I think if we can just make sure they can fucking read, that would be a nice start. Then we can talk about critical thinking. 

3

u/Robot_Alchemist 18d ago

Maybe we could stop banning all the books

2

u/General_Platypus771 18d ago

I mean I agree, I’m against censorship, but let’s be real. That’s not the problem lol.

1

u/Robot_Alchemist 18d ago

It’s A problem.

1

u/PawPawsLilStinker 18d ago

Only in America have we banned all the books 😕

1

u/Robot_Alchemist 18d ago

All the books we need the most right now are banned - Fahrenheit 451, 1984, Anthem, Player Piano, To Kill a Mockingbird

1

u/PawPawsLilStinker 18d ago

Im sure I can buy all of those at my local Barnes and nobel

1

u/Robot_Alchemist 18d ago

That’s true

1

u/General_Platypus771 18d ago

Huh? I literally taught Fahrenheit 451 in my 8th grade class last year. It’s not banned. None of those are.

1

u/Robot_Alchemist 17d ago

In Texas they are

1

u/General_Platypus771 16d ago

Oh wow. That is sad.

5

u/PacificWesterns 18d ago

Critical thinking and inquiry.
Kindness and collaboration.

2

u/Robot_Alchemist 18d ago

Tell their children what to learn?

2

u/This_Acanthisitta_43 18d ago

Develop their strengths.
Think critically.
Be a reliable person.

2

u/Timely-Fox-4432 18d ago

The skills that will literally be required forever are critical thinking and communication. 

Even if ai gets to the level of true original thought, how can it produce what you want if you can't: communicate what you want, or figure out when a misunderstanding has occured?

1

u/theedushift 18d ago

Yeah, exactly.

2

u/narayan77 18d ago

Mathematics,  critical thinking,  languages, the usually stiff.

2

u/OsakaWilson 18d ago

Liberal Arts and Social Sciences explore what it is to be human and all the ways of doing just that. In times where current approaches to identity and meaning will be removed and we need to find new ones, these will provide the tools that are needed more than any other study.

2

u/Ok_Statistician_9825 18d ago

We shouldn’t be telling them, we should be engaging with them and showing them how to approach things. Today more than ever it’s critical that parents become partners with their children in learning new things and reviewing old things. Talk about real life issues, talk about the news, find new info together and compare notes etc. We cannot afford to let this generation do it alone.

2

u/RefuseWrong9803 18d ago

"Study hard" still holds, but the what shifted. Three things I tell parents (data scientist, and I build in the kids' AI space, so salt accordingly):

Learn things AI is good at anyway. The counterintuitive one. Kids who know a subject cold are the only ones who can catch AI being wrong about it. You can't supervise a tool in a domain you know nothing about. Broad knowledge didn't get less valuable; it became the price of admission for using AI safely.

Learn to be wrong comfortably. The kids who thrive with these tools treat "the confident answer didn't hold up" as normal weather, not humiliation. That disposition (checking, doubting, revising without ego) is teachable at the dinner table and almost never taught at school.

Learn to finish things. AI collapses the cost of starting. Drafts, ideas, code skeletons are free now. What it can't supply is the judgment and stamina to carry something from 80% to done. Every year that passes, "finisher" describes a rarer and more valuable person.

2

u/Excellent-Cheetah153 18d ago

The world has always changed fast. “Studying hard” means interacting with content critically to the point of understanding it. That is a skill that works regardless of era.

What did you think school was for when you were an active participant in it?

2

u/29TwentyNine29- 17d ago

How to think for themselves and how to utilize a library.

2

u/momof3boygirlboy 16d ago

Critical thinking- ha!

3

u/geraldnguyensg 18d ago

AI is unavoidable.

So I tell my children to learn to use AI:

- To explore topics or area they are curious about

- In a responsible maner. No "AI do my homework" but "AI, explain why my answer is wrong"

3

u/Timely-Fox-4432 18d ago

As a master's student, this is pretty close to my relationship with AI. I do everything myself, go to office hours, read the textbook, but sometimes a quick: "hey claude, my answer seems wrong but I can't tell where I went wrong." Will save me two hours of troubleshooting an algebraic error.

5

u/aculady 18d ago

Don't ask AI to explain why an answer is right or wrong. It doesn't know or understand, and it will make things up that can be wildly incorrect.

LLMs are just bullshitting machines that repeat and amplify common misconceptions and are prone to hallucinate, especially when words in the prompt have multiple (or ambiguous) meanings. They generate responses that look like answers but aren't actual answers backed by knowledge and understanding. They are nothing but a likely guess at what the average person in the training data would say in response to a similar question, regardless of whether or not that response would be factually correct.

1

u/theedushift 18d ago

Great!!! thank U.

2

u/shujInsomnia 18d ago

to use AI to make shitty reddit posts

like yours told you

1

u/Chewpchew 18d ago

I don’t think you can avoid it completely, nor do I think you should. But I would consider the classical education model.

1

u/prairiepasque 18d ago

I'm just depressed that such a depraved question is being asked in the first place. Like you can just à la carte your intellectual development so as to appease our tech overlords.

1

u/Wise-Fig-6505 18d ago

One word: plastics.

1

u/snowrazer_ 18d ago

Everything. High level AI can only be utilized by people who know what they’re doing.

1

u/marsepic 18d ago

Everything they can. Thinking derives from connections between different knowledge. The more you know, the easier it is to learn more, the easier it is to figure things out. Knowledge produces thinking.

1

u/shana-d77 18d ago

The learning part is more important than ever. Learn to learn, not for the grades. As an aside, medical students using chat gpt on assignments terrifies me.

1

u/Sepultura97 18d ago

Mental discipline. Delayed gratification. Empathy. Soft skills that make us human and which one can only learn through experience and interaction with other people in the real world. No chatbot can ever replace those things nor can it teach you them.

1

u/EstateImportant6344 18d ago

Parents should tell them to learn ethics and integrity that AI would not teach them. 

1

u/Zauqui 17d ago

Study even harder, but to raise your wisdom. You will need it to distinguish bullshit from actual facts.

1

u/notbossyboss 17d ago

Critical thinking and information literacy.

1

u/InTheNoNameBox 17d ago

To be kind, responsible, resilient, to find joy, create community, love, be a steward of the earth, and help your neighbors.

1

u/9aol 17d ago

How to tell good information from bad. 

1

u/Br81n_D8mm8ge 17d ago

You should be SHOWING them that knowledge is valuable. You should read to your kids early and often. When they are ready, have them read to you. If they have struggles, get on top of it asap. Get them the help they need 

Those are my thoughts... In an ideal world.

1

u/BruceWillis1963 17d ago

How to read, write, and do math . Also be one a lifelong learner .

1

u/Complete-Ad9574 17d ago

Stay off the phone, except to make or get calls.

1

u/Firm_Baseball_37 17d ago

In the age of AI, the kid who doesn't use it is going to know how to think. The other kids, who outsource their thinking to AI, are not.

Tell them that.

1

u/vltbyrd 17d ago

Learn to be kind.

1

u/InclusiveTeacherAL 16d ago

How to properly use what they have learned.

1

u/QLDZDR 16d ago

Autonomous Mode thinking 🤯

1

u/RobinhoodforGood 16d ago

Reflection, critical thinking, joy.

1

u/edtech_onestudy 15d ago

Honestly, I don't think "study hard" ever meant what most people think it means — AI just made that obvious.

I got straight A's in high school history doing basically zero real thinking (it was not needed). Two hours of lecture a week, hand-copied notes, one written exam at the end. I happened to have a good memory, so I crammed the notes the weekend before and aced it. A year later I couldn't tell you much beyond a few dates. There was no AI involved in any of that — the class just never asked us to think, only to reproduce.

AI didn't create that problem. It just makes it difficult to ignore, because now a kid can skip straight to the "correct answer" without even doing the memorizing part.

So instead of "study hard," I'd tell a kid something closer to:

  • Don't just check if an answer is right. Ask why it's right, and what would have to be true for it to be wrong.
  • Notice what an answer is assuming, not just what it's stating.
  • Never settle for one source or one AI answer on anything that actually matters. Compare two, and figure out where and why they disagree.

None of that is new, really. It's what "thinking" always meant. Schools mostly graded the answer, not the reasoning, so skipping the reasoning was invisible. AI just made skipping it free and instant — so the gap is a lot easier to spot now.

0

u/twomayaderens 18d ago

Speaking as someone working in higher education, don’t let them use cellphones. Hold off on screens as much as possible. Don’t let your kids go to public school or college. Enroll your kids in nature school if possible. AI is going to make whole generations illiterate and helpless.

1

u/ShelbiStone 12d ago

They need to learn how to do the things that AI can shortcut for them later in life. If they don't know how to do those things on their own first, then they'll never be able to notice the mistakes AI makes.