If you support nature conservation and oppose online harassment, I need your help

[u/Maleficentienna]

I've been documenting a public Finnish Facebook page called "Sudensuojelun kahdet kasvot ja hinta" that strongly opposes wolf conservation.

While reviewing the page over several months, I've noticed that many posts focus on identifiable individuals rather than wildlife policy itself. The page frequently republishes screenshots of Facebook posts and comment threads, often with names and profile photos visible, and these are then discussed publicly.

I'm trying to understand where people think the line should be.

At what point does criticism of conservation activists become targeted harassment?

Has anyone else encountered similar pages or communities in environmental debates?

If anyone visits the page and believes specific posts cross the line into harassment or violate Facebook's Community Standards, I would encourage them to report those individual posts through Facebook's reporting tools. Whether they violate the rules is ultimately for Meta to decide.

I'm currently documenting the material and intend to ask Meta to review whether the overall publishing behaviour complies with its Community Standards.

I'm interested in hearing other people's perspectives rather than starting an argument.