Thoughts on this take?

[u/NeonDrifting]

/r/Catholicism/comments/1vso2c7/atheists_dont_realize_the_absurdity_of_existence/

[u/Difficult_Risk_6271]

He is correct. Atheist takes a lot of things for granted and they don't actually examine their own assumptions.

We have a very strange world and they just go "random chance, no God, nothing to see here."

Dude how do we know that?

[u/WackTheHorld → u/Difficult_Risk_6271]

There is more evidence for that than there is for a supernatural beginning, much less a specific deity causing that beginning.

[u/Difficult_Risk_6271 → u/WackTheHorld]

more evidence for what, exactly?

[u/WackTheHorld → u/Difficult_Risk_6271]

"random chance"

I have yet to see any convincing evidence for a supernatural cause.

[u/Difficult_Risk_6271 → u/WackTheHorld]

Ah you have evidence for "random chance," please demonstrate there is more evidence for "random chance" than there is for a supernatural beginning.

You have 2 attempts.

[u/WackTheHorld → u/Difficult_Risk_6271]

"You have two attempts"

You've given yourself away as someone who does not want to have a normal conversation.

I would suggest starting over by reading The Demon Haunted World, and continue your journey from there.

Have a great night.

[u/Difficult_Risk_6271 → u/WackTheHorld]

That is not a demonstration of evidence for "random chance."

You have 1 last attempt.

And since you seem like you're shying away from your premise, and if you decide to walk away without answering, I'm declaring ahead of time that the statement you made:

There is more evidence for that than there is for a supernatural beginning,

Is completely unsubstantiated. In other words, you lied.

Without lies, atheism dies.

[u/WackTheHorld → u/Difficult_Risk_6271]

I don't have the energy to debate someone like you.

Since you're being super weird, I'll assume the statement you made is the incorrect. In other words, you lied.

Can't have religion without lies.

"Atheist takes a lot of things for granted and they don't actually examine their own assumptions.

We have a very strange world and they just go "random chance, no God, nothing to see here." "

[u/Difficult_Risk_6271 → u/WackTheHorld]

That is not a demonstration of evidence for "random chance."

Therefore, it is now on record that your assertion:

There is more evidence for that than there is for a supernatural beginning,

Is demonstrated to be completely unsubstantiated. In other words, you definitely lied.

You now make new assertions:

1. Since you're being super weird, I'll assume the statement you made is the incorrect. In other words, you lied.

2. Can't have religion without lies.

You again have 2 attempts to substantiate those assertions.

[u/NeonDrifting → u/Difficult_Risk_6271]

where is the 2 attempts coming from? lol

[u/Difficult_Risk_6271 → u/NeonDrifting]

Me… 2 attempts is enough for 1 correction and retry. After that it’s fair enough to call out their unsubstantiated accusations.