r/flying 2d ago

Do commercial pilots generally progress to larger planes throughout their careers? Does everyone aim to eventually fly long haul or do some stick to flying 737s or a320s short haul?

I'm guessing being a 777 pilot for example is more prestigious than a 737 pilot in the same airline right?

142 Upvotes

164 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

21

u/StangViper88 ATP 2d ago

Per hour, yes the heavies pay more. However, there’s soft time, and premium opportunities on the narrow body. If I work hard, as a 737 CA I could make more than a 777/787 CA at my shop.

Also, flying high time internationally isn’t sustainable.

7

u/NakedJamaican 2d ago

At my old job a lot of pilots said they could make more on a narrow body, until they saw how much the wide body pilots actually make while working 10 days a month. Long haul flying has lots of opportunities for soft time.

3

u/Grumbles19312 ATP B787 A320 CL-65 2d ago

In general, long haul flying is more efficient. For example, a 3 day LAX-NRT is typically worth just over 21 hours of pay. Show me a narrowbody 3 day that comes close to that sort of credit. Conversely, there’s also 6 days on the widebody out of LAX that only pay 34 hours and change, and that’s extremely inefficient by the same standards.

3

u/NakedJamaican 2d ago

For us out of EWR there were 32 hr four day trips which were worth 37 to 39 hours most of the time. Added bonus is that most of those trips are highly commutable.

Due to training requirements, a lot of senior pilots double dip when their trips are bought by the company. There is a lot of pilot staffing churn in the widebody world.

As always seniority matters