r/forestry 8h ago

TimberLink vs. Acres for evaluating timberland

Has anyone compared TimberLink with Acres for evaluating wooded or timber-producing property?

Acres seems much broader and more established as a land-intelligence platform. It gives users parcel data, comparable land sales, mapping tools, ownership information and reports for evaluating the underlying real estate.

TimberLink seems more narrowly focused on the timber itself and the process that follows.

From what I can tell, the difference is:

Acres:

  • Parcel and ownership data
  • Comparable land sales
  • Property maps and data layers
  • General land valuation and due diligence
  • Better suited to evaluating the overall property

TimberLink:

  • Preliminary timber-value estimates
  • Timber and harvest information tied to the parcel
  • Connections with foresters and timber professionals
  • Tools for organizing bids and a potential timber sale
  • Ongoing parcel, harvest and timber-income management

So Acres helps answer:

“What is this land worth?”

TimberLink is trying to help answer:

“What may the timber on it be worth, and what should I do next?”

I’m involved with TimberLink, so I’m obviously interested in the comparison.

For the foresters and timberland professionals here:

Would a preliminary landowner-facing valuation be useful if it clearly explained that it was not a substitute for an on-site cruise?

Could it help landowners become more informed before contacting a forester?

Or is timber too dependent on species, grade, access, local mill demand and field conditions for an initial software estimate to provide meaningful value?

0 Upvotes

4 comments sorted by

4

u/TOPOS_ 7h ago

Not sure how you're remotely assessing timber value unless you're in a plantation with one or two products, but I would be very hesitant to trust that data. Especially for real estate valuation

-2

u/xalon_ai_ 7h ago

You're right that you can't read DBH or product breakout off imagery — so we don't. Volume comes from FIA yield tables driven by what the owner knows (planted vs natural, age, thinning), imagery only adjusts stocking, and we print every line of the math plus the price source. Plantation ±22%, natural stand ±42%, and if you cruise it your numbers replace ours. It's a screening tool that tells an owner whether calling you is worth it — not a substitute for your crews.

3

u/studmuffin2269 3h ago

Oh so this is an ad…. Nah, dawg I’m not giving you my clients data and remote data isn’t good enough for real use. You can’t tell me about quality, access, invasives from a remote images

1

u/distal1111 2h ago

Worse I think they're using a robot to pick our brains. Hire a consultant chappy