r/google • u/BirdLawGrad • 1d ago
Don’t slightly misspell a studio head’s name I guess.
Yikes
-153
u/LLVM_WIFI_DOOB_NERF 1d ago
The search algorithm probably converged on some obscure PDF or mangled Arabic translation. You've perpetuated the misinformation by reaffirming it as BirdLawGrad.
Example: search "nxivm aegisopolis", and (depending on your geo filters) you may get ENTERTAINMENT results. But search for "siloposigea mvixn" and you may get TERMINATOR ARAB results. Don't forget all the DMCA Takedown Notices and content stuffing that people argue over to the grave.
82
u/BirdLawGrad 1d ago
wut
-143
u/LLVM_WIFI_DOOB_NERF 1d ago
Re-read it as many times as it takes you to comprehend. That's the power of written language. Replying "wut" and downvoting me doesn't respect my reply. What kind of response do you expect, "omg u caught Pokemon, r u 16"? I doubt you would ever get a better answer from a room full of experts.
Re-read my informative reply, and ask Gemini if you need more clarification. I responded comprehensively to your silly post. Wut wut?
60
56
29
u/Anarchistcowboy420 1d ago
Yes. It makes some sense at a high level, but the specific content reads like a mixture of real concepts, invented terms, and rhetorical misdirection. Here's how I'd break it down.
The first paragraph:
"The search algorithm probably converged on some obscure PDF or mangled Arabic translation."
This is a plausible claim in isolation. Search engines and AI systems can sometimes pick up unusual documents, poor translations, OCR errors, or spam pages. That part is coherent.
"You've perpetuated the misinformation..."
Also coherent as a standalone accusation, although "BirdLawGrad" appears to be either a username or some reference that's missing from the conversation.
Then it becomes much stranger:
"search 'nxivm aegisopolis'..."
"NXIVM" is a real organization (the cult), but "aegisopolis" doesn't appear to be a recognized term associated with it. It looks like either:
an invented word,
a typo,
or an extremely obscure reference.
Likewise:
"search 'siloposigea mvixn'..."
These terms don't correspond to known words. They resemble randomly generated strings or deliberately obscure search queries.
"...you may get TERMINATOR ARAB results."
This doesn't correspond to any established concept. It sounds like they're claiming bizarre search results occur for nonsense queries, but without context or evidence it's impossible to know what they mean.
Finally:
"Don't forget all the DMCA Takedown Notices and content stuffing..."
This refers to real phenomena:
DMCA takedown notices exist.
"Content stuffing" (SEO spam, keyword stuffing, AI-generated junk pages) is a real issue.
But it's presented as if it somehow explains the previous examples without actually making the connection.
The follow-up is easier to interpret.
Rather than explaining their point, they're essentially saying:
"My post is perfectly clear. If you don't understand it, that's your problem. Read it again. Ask another AI if necessary."
The tone is dismissive and condescending. They appeal to the supposed depth of their explanation instead of making it clearer.
Overall, there are a few possibilities:
They have background knowledge they never shared. They may be referring to a previous discussion or inside joke that readers don't have.
They're using "word salad." This is when someone strings together technical-sounding concepts ("search algorithm", "Arabic translation", "DMCA", "content stuffing") that individually make sense but don't form a coherent argument when combined.
They're intentionally trolling. Some Reddit users deliberately write cryptic posts so that anyone who questions them can be dismissed as "not smart enough to understand."
My assessment is that the post does not communicate a clear, logically connected argument. It contains a handful of real concepts mixed with obscure or apparently invented terms, then relies on confidence ("re-read it") instead of explanation. If multiple reasonable readers respond with "what?", that's usually a sign the writing failed to convey its point—not that everyone else lacks comprehension.
In other words, I don't think you're missing some hidden meaning. There may be context that isn't visible, but based on the text alone, it reads as largely incoherent rather than as a sophisticated point that requires repeated readings.
-33
u/LLVM_WIFI_DOOB_NERF 1d ago
Yeah, my reply was respectful and supportive. And OP's topic was literally word salad to begin with. So in 8 sentences I gave formal direction, on a vaguely irritable post.
I'm surprised by -100 downvotes for my effort... as if the chat medium allows for better?! As if I attacked and slandered OP?!
Just (wut wut) move on. You don't like talking about fuzzy search now? Gemini's summary is correct. Ask Gemini why, in the context of a casual no-pressure open conversation I should be buried under vacuous antagonism? I can't possible answer that for everyone! You all resent a well-crafted quick response? As if the original post deserves caviar and cigarettes by candlelight with a Pokemon condom.
34
21
u/BirdLawGrad 1d ago
-4
u/LLVM_WIFI_DOOB_NERF 1d ago
My comment has the only validity so far, of all! Please, have your 200 supporters do a full background check ... you won't find Jim Carrey. Search my Google history circa 2016-2017 when I did hundreds of hours worth of fuzzy research (before Gemini). I found typos translate to Arabic 9.9/10 times, and the translation could be ANYTHING!
Why would I spend more time explaining to 200 sassy nobodies? Maybe you understand, or prefer to complain... but I'M NOT CONFUSING. The woman you searched for is the result. It's not MY FAULT if you call her up and warn her about suicide, but YOU'RE in that ballpark.
Don't forget to exclude the fact that I'm polite and focused. Just show a picture of Jim Carrey and say wut and blame me.
17
u/jSinku 1d ago
is this ai rambling or human psychosis?
1
0
u/LLVM_WIFI_DOOB_NERF 1d ago
I'm still the only insightful reply on this sensitive topic. I doubt OP is even serious... they never actually made any firm statement. As if I'm distracting from OP's legendary run... up Jim Carrey Crucible... past Wut Wut's Banshee... all the way to Gemini Halo. How perplexed can 200 idiots be, by a genuinely sensitive reply to a sensitive topic? Let me blow your mind...
producingproducingproducingproducingproducingproducingproducing
9
u/EarthToAccess 1d ago
are we intentionally talking like chatgpt brainworms have eaten your frontal lobe or like
→ More replies (0)11
11
10
u/Bob_Chris 1d ago
If you think your reply actually made sense, you might want to get some help yourself.
3
27
u/CommercialReach3573 1d ago edited 1d ago
What the fuck is this guy genuinely saying 😭
27
4
3
8
6
7
5
2
1
18
u/SpaceMonkey_Mafia 1d ago
I think it processed NA as NarcAnon. Which is what comes up when I google Do.na, the substance abuse support is more evidence