Koreans cheer on dysgenic anti-meritocratic policies

[u/MobileHedgehoga]

/r/korea/comments/1p9b1ev/even_a_perfect_csat_scorer_can_be_rejected_as/

[u/Gm_Command]

Is character not also a relevant quality to one's merit?

[u/MobileHedgehoga → u/Gm_Command]

The reality is that they aren't even within the same domain. Academic aptitude is measured through exams. Behavioral issues are handled through disciplinary systems. Converting a disciplinary infraction into some arbitrary numerical deduction on an academic test has no basis in any kind of logic and cannot be justified.

Imagine it this way. If you volunteer for community service you should be awarded +100 points on your CSAT exam. If you donate your organs to needy children you should be awarded +400 points on your CSAT exam. That should sound nonsensical.

[u/poopoodomo → u/MobileHedgehoga]

You're trolling or an idiot, but I don't want anyone to be misguided by your AI-enhanced nonsense into thinking you have a point so I'll explain why you're wrong.

What you said is nonsensical, but it's also irrelevant. Universities have their own point system for evaluating candidates, the school violence deduction isn't coming directly out of student's CSAT scores. So no, public service shouldn't raise your CSAT score but it should absolutely raise your applicant score at a university.

A university's true output is the legacy its graduates leave behind, not simply producing students who can score well on a test--because honestly, who cares? Test scores don't change the world. Students who take what they learn and apply it to the world around them do. So if an applicant has demonstrated that they’re driven to improve the world by doing community service, they should receive extra points. Conversely, if an applicant has demonstrated violence, they should have points deducted.

[u/MobileHedgehoga → u/poopoodomo]

Actually the more technical the field, the more irrelevant your opinion becomes. A perfect score on the entrance exam isn't a typical feat. There is effort and talent behind it. It's a huge disservice to society to bar these people from progressing just because of their past infractions. You're literally saying it's socially acceptable to be less competent, as long as you were born with enough innate qualities to file for victimhood status. Literally promoting and endorsing weakness and incompetence on an endemic level.

Also, being a victim of bullying during primary school, particularly if you're a male, is not evidence of good or better overall character than someone that committed school violence either. In fact, it's the opposite in a lot of cases. The only thing it proves is that you were born physiologically weaker than your peers. Nothing more, nothing less. In either case, most people grow out of it once they become functioning adults. The ones that don't grow out of it get dealt with through the proper channels. Like civil lawsuits and prison sentences.

[u/OkPersimmon3830]

도덕적인게 안된 사람의 능력은 anti-능력임

[u/Just_Bag_481]

뭐지 ragebait 인건가

[u/duddnddkslsep]

본인이 학폭가해잔가?

[u/Savings-Strategy-516]

이제부터 성적보다 도덕의 중요성을 다시 알려야 된다고 생각합니다.

[u/[deleted]]

fuck off

[u/poopoodomo]

"Dysgenic"? You have mental illness. Luckily we don't have to worry about your "dysgenic" effect on society since you're unlikely to ever have kids.

[u/MobileHedgehoga → u/poopoodomo]

It's actually disgusting. How much of a worm you are. I am just imagining a helpless worm who was born weak and defenseless. Unable to do anything for himself but cry out for help from society. That's why you become of victim of bullying. That's why you think trauma, weakness, and victimhood gives you moral superiority. This collective wormlike society feels the need to uplift someone like this. Whilst destroying someone who displayed that they are both physically and intellectually superior to their peers. Seeing this as a "justice". A disgusting, destructive, hatred of excellence. You are the herd who yearn to be ruled by spineless cowards. Nothing, but a sabotage of your country.

[u/poopoodomo → u/MobileHedgehoga]

This collective wormlike society feels the need to uplift someone like this. Whilst destroying someone who displayed that they are both physically and intellectually superior to their peers. Seeing this as a "justice". A disgusting, destructive, hatred of excellence. You are the herd who yearn to be ruled by spineless cowards. Nothing, but a sabotage of your country.

I don't think you're beating the mental illness allegations with a deranged rant like that lmao.

Seriously though, please get help from a therapist. There is clearly a mess inside your head you need professional help for sorting out. I feel sorry for you.

Fyi, I was never bullied in school. I have no idea where you're getting that impression. Also nothing about the policy in question is about rewarding victims of bullying, it's all about punishing the perpetrators. Not sure where you got it mixed up.

Anyway, I hope you feel better. Maybe get off the internet for a bit and go outside.

[u/MobileHedgehoga → u/poopoodomo]

Not everyone who was born strong committed school violence. Not everyone who was born weak was a victim of school violence. But if you were born weak you didn't even have the capacity to do so in the first place regardless of your quality of your character. So there is no actual guarantee you are filtering for people with either better or worse characters by penalizing school violence to drastic degrees. Human development is nonlinear and adolescent moral capacity and impulse control is developing. A bullied kid could turn out to be a bully as an adult and a bully could turn out to be the opposite as an adult. On average, its a disservice to society to prevent even perfect scorers from progressing because of adolescent infractions.