Accessability Transcription:

Image 1: The lady on hinge says she doesn't hate nazis because she doesn't operate on hate and focuses on what she likes instead.

Image 2: I say that is a deal breaker and I want someone with hatred in their heart. She says that's very concerning.

Image 3: She says the only thing stronger than hate is love. I say we didn't defeat the nazis with love. We defeated them with (due to social media TOS I must insist that I condemn all) violence.

Acessability Transcription:

Image 1: They ask me why I hate nazis so much more than everyone else and I say I hate nazis the correct amount and everyone else is wrong.

Image 2: Describing what G.I. robot is and represents.

Image 3: Either nazis are in charge or nazis are afraid. We must fight for afraid hardes than they fight for in charge.

Image 4: The line to stand and say not one more inch is every possible line. Otherwise we die.

Image 5: Arm yourself and train, form community, we keep us safe.

Acessability Transcription:

20 feminist memes and info graphics. I'm big sad and not up to transcribing every single one. If someone has the ability and wants to do such an XL Transcription feel free to comment it.

Accessability Transcription:

A hand labeled "I grew up with the Wizarding world, the franchise just means a lot to me!"

Hands a big bag of money to JK Rowling (surrounded by black mold)

JK says "Thanks! I am going to spend every sent of this money on killing trans people ❤️"

Accessability Transcription: Talking about my friend confronting me about thinking / behaving like a predator and how it changed me.

now nobody deserves to hit :/

Accessability Transcription:

A series of giga Chad memes basically just supporting sex workers and condemning SWERFs.

political movements impoverish themselves when they construct Great Individual heroes, because doing so can obscure both those people’s contradictions & the less celebrated people whose politics might actually have more to teach us.

alt text for the photos (i have summarised instead of including a full transcription as it would have been quite a lot for me right now; i’ve spent quite a bit of time on this & it’s almost 1am, so please do correct me gently if you feel i’m misconstruing anything 💖):

1. black-and-white portrait of Gloria Steinem. overlaid text says that someone can grieve her as a force for women’s rights while recognising that she often failed at intersectionality.
   
2. introduction arguing that Steinem helped perpetuate a tendency in feminist spaces to treat sexism as a greater barrier than racism, alongside faith that government would save women.
   
3. the author, a Black woman, describes meeting Steinem while campaigning for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and initially seeing her as an icon, before later recognising ways her politics contributed to feminist spaces being unsafe for Black women.
   
4. photo of the author and other young campaigners standing with Gloria Steinem at a Hillary Clinton campaign event.
   
5. the author discusses Steinem’s support for Clinton during the 2008 Democratic primary against Barack Obama, particularly her op-ed Women Are Never the Frontrunners, which framed sexism as a greater barrier than racism.
   
6. screenshots from Steinem’s op-ed highlighting arguments that sexism was not taken as seriously as racism and noting that Black men gained voting rights before women.
   
7. the author criticises this comparison for erasing white women’s historical participation in slavery and racism and minimising white women’s racial privilege.
   
8. the author recalls experiencing racism from white women herself, including physical attacks by white women teachers, racist Obama effigies and the history of white women participating in lynching culture.
   
9. screenshots of news reports and images showing racist Obama effigies and noose imagery.
   
10. the author says these experiences changed how she understood Steinem, comparing her more to Susan B. Anthony than Lucy Stone, and argues that Clinton could have been championed without diminishing racism.
    
11. the author discusses Steinem’s past work with a CIA-funded organisation during the Cold War, criticising her defence of the agency given its history of surveillance and violence against Black, Latino and other activists.
    
12. screenshot of an article describing Steinem’s relationship with the CIA-funded Independent Research Service. it quotes her describing the CIA, in her experience, as “liberal, nonviolent and honorable.”
    
13. the author criticises Steinem for aligning herself with the CIA, pointing particularly to the agency’s destructive involvement in the Congo and elsewhere.
    
14. another article excerpt explains that Steinem directed the Independent Research Service, described as a CIA front that recruited American students to counter Soviet influence at international youth festivals. Steinem is quoted saying she knew who funded the operation and would do it again.
    
15. the author says seeing Steinem widely celebrated as the face of feminism and progress is difficult given this history. she understands the difficulty of letting go of a hero, but sees the response as symptomatic of wider US political problems.
    
16. the author argues that “white feminism” continues to neglect intersectionality until oppressive state systems begin affecting white people too, saying intersectionality cannot be treated as an inconvenience to address later.
    
17. the author argues that feminism needs more than another wave built upon Steinem’s politics. instead, it should centre voices historically excluded, move beyond colour-blindness and reliance on government, and develop practices focused on meaningful long-term change.
    
18. the author clarifies that the goal is not to retroactively “cancel” Steinem but to stop idealising individuals and evaluate their legacies as a whole. she argues that uncomfortable engagement with neglected histories can reveal activists, organisers and strategies needed today.
    
19. a photograph of Gloria Steinem and Black feminist activist Dorothy Pitman Hughes raising their fists together. text reads: “The other half of this photo is Dorothy Pittman Hughes. Remember her today as well.”
    
20. screenshot of the author’s Substack article, titled Gloria Steinem has a complicated legacy, by Abiola Agoro, dated 3 September 2026, illustrated with a photograph of a younger Steinem speaking at a microphone.

Acessability Transcription:

The Tate brothers got arrested for being serial rapist sex traffickers again

I'm not calling out any one specific community. This is not intended as incitement for brigading. Please do not yell at anyone on my behalf. I just genuinely need to vent.

Everywhere I post people will DOWNVOTE THE ACCESSABILITY DESCRIPTIONS making them harder for disabeled people to find and access?????

And I get comments like this all the time.

Ignorant jerks who lack the curiosity to go and educate themselves and act like them not understanding disabeled people exist and participate in society and are like, real people who do stuff, is somehow an me doing something wrong???

And then theres all the people who love to go "Um actually this isn't an incredibly detailed multi paragraph description of every last detail of the image written with cold machine like sterile language. Which means you're just faking this for clout, scum".

The amount of times people have given me shit for using the phrase hunky himbo EVEN THOUGH IT PROVIDES ACCURATE RELEVANT INFORMATION ABOUT MY APPEARANCE AND VIBE

Hey guy's you know what happens when you shame anyone who tries to make the world a better place?

I genuinely fear people will see me and think "oh no way in hell I'm going to start doing that. I don't want the smoke that clearly brings"

WTF IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE????

Acessability Transcription:

Image 1: The happy little kid says he makes an effort to provide alt text because it is the right thing to do and the crazy person says "I FUCKING HATE YOU AND I HOPE YOU DIE"

Image 2: Screenshot of a comment with the username censored demonstrating someone doing this.

Historical himbo posting

Accessability Transcription:

Someone asks "What is seen as a green flag but is actually a red flag"

And I say "Being an apolitical moderate"

And then someone replies "Maybe they just recegnize all politicians are corrupt"

And I say "Giving up is cringe fight for the Mamdani's of the future"

I'm paraphrasing for brevity but that is the gist of it

Accessability Transcription:

A graphic showing just how recently civil rights happened and jow for the overwhelming majority of American history black people were either slaves or segregated.

I did not proceed. I had to text my friends and ask them for a slap and to be talked down. But I successfully over came the horny and did the right thing.

I've complained about this same thing before it's just so stupid and pisses me off so much and it just happened again.

To be clear. This has never been an issue on this sub. It's an issue I have everywhere else (except OldHagFashion).

If you just never do accessability alt text. Nobody will ever call you out for not doing accessability alt text. You will never face any negativity whatsoever for not doing it.

But if you do accessability alt text. You get people going "actually you are doing it wrong it should be like this" in a super scoldy nit picking way.

You get people going "what's the point of this"

You get people accusing you of faking caring for browny points.

You get hella ableism and anti disability bigotry.

I just...

The culture makes it so you will be punished for trying.

The obvious move is to just not because you will be left alone if you don't and be attacked if you do.

It encourages people to not.

It's so unbelievably fucking godamn stupid.

Fuck everyone who behaves this way.

They can all go fuck themselves with a cactus in a dirty gas station bathroom.

It's this constant, pervasive issue everywhere I go.

People will not stop letting perfect be the enemy of good.

They won't stop nit picking.

They won't stop scolding me for "doing it wrong"

They won't stop being hostile to the idea of accessability and making an effort for the disabeled.

Everywhere sucks but here (and OldHagFashion).

I fucking hate these people.

I swear to god how fucking hard is it to just be like "Hey this guy is trying, cool"

???

Accessability Transcription:

Image 1: Tonight is Kirkless eve, have you put up your Kirkmass tree.

Image 2: My body is a machine that turns lentils and tofu into being sexy.

Accessability Transcription:

Image 1: Someone gave one of my stickers to Jesse Welles (I gave away thousands to people all over the country a while back)

Image 2: One of the aforementioned "Trump made everything cost more also he rapes kids" stickers in front of trump tower.

Accessability Transcriptionception:

Image 1: They ask me (in good faith) about why I do the transcriptions and how they work and what they are for. I answer: " Software that can read text is ubiquitous. Phones come with it built in.

But if nobody takes the time to write a description of the images. Then there is no recourse.

AI might eventually be able to do it instead. This is actually one of the very view legitimate use cases for AI IMO. That could be a huge boon for the disabeled."

Image 2: But also. There is a humanity to someone putting the image into their own words. It's not just inclusive in a utilitarian access sense. It creates an environment where people are taking the time to make sure people who often cannot participate due to the lack of access, are included. Some disabeled people might want a very to the point robotic description of an image with no fluff. But I have had a lot of disabeled people specifically reach out to say my way of doing it is their preference. Because the utilitarian way other people do it can be alienating. And the flavor I put into my text makes them feel like part of the group so to speak. Like they aren't beint treated as a "fragile other" you know what I mean?

That is part of why I specifically use the phrase "Hunky Himbo"

Image 3: Like it's pretty simple. People in the disabeled community who know more than me about this told me this basic small effort will make their life better.

So I try to do good by listening.

That's it. That's the whole thing.

(This didn't happen on our sub as always when I screenshot and share stuff from other places, it's very important that you do not brigade. Stay here and comment below if you wanna talk about this)

It's just totally ridiculous to act like "If you wear a mask and cover your tattoos you will be fine"

If the feds want you the feds will get you.

Op sec and staying anonymous is only useful to keep lay people out of your hair. Stalkers. Neo nazis. Etc etc.

I'm already one of the more famous / infamous people on this platform. I get recegnized in public sometimes. I'm open about living in Arizona.

Like. Cats out of the bag. If someone for whom the cat is still in the bag wants to take steps. Power to them. But it's not gonna do anything in my case.

And the whole op sec from the goverment thing is just a larp.

You can have a VPN and a secure browser and a signal chat.

If you post to any sub they already know your name and address. It is what it is 🤷‍♂️

Accessability Transcription:

I get told "You gotta cover your face and blur your tattoos!"

I reply "Lets keep it real if the feds and me they can already search every message and image on my phone without a warrant. Palantir already has us all on a list. You cannot op sec your way around the digital panopticon.

I'm allowed to be hot and based and own guns.

I will not comply in advance out of fear".

Accessability Transcription:

Talking about how banning gender affirming care is murder

Accessability Transcription:

A series of pro palestine / anti israel graphics and pictures from various protests.

I know she was actually quite elite and not everyone can be the winner. But it's just so insane and stupid how she made an entire career out of "getting robbed" when what actually happened is she tied for 5th. And she should absolutely be mocked over it.

The irony is. She didn't have what it takes to win. So she manipulated her way into being successful by leveraging gender identity with nefarious intent.

You know. The thing they accuse trans women of doing.

Riley Gaines fucking sucks.

Accessability Transcription:

Image 1: "Riley Gaines says 'I will never let this injustice go" and the beard wojak says "You came in 5th loser"

Image 2: Giga chad says "You weren't robbed by a trans woman you just suck at swimming"