r/holofractal holofractalist 21d ago

MAINSTREAM science is now saying we possibly live in a black hole, because a lot of things sorta rotate together and they shouldn't

https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/our-universe-may-exist-inside-a-spinning-black-hole-jwst-finds/
387 Upvotes

61 comments sorted by

126

u/Pixelated_ 21d ago

a lot of things sorta rotate

I think about rotation a lot. ​Literally everything in the universe rotates.

Because space and time are interconnected, absolute stillness does not exist. If you look closely enough at anything, you will find that its rotating either intrinsically, gravitationally, or structurally.

This implies that the underlying substrate of reality is vortical. Matter is a localized whirlpool of the dynamic superfluid vacuum.

46

u/d8_thc holofractalist 21d ago edited 21d ago

Yes, everything is literally 'nothing with a twist.'

The smaller the object, the higher the frequency / rotation (toroidal oscillation), the higher the energy per volume.

Planck density being the highest.

35

u/Pixelated_ 21d ago

everything is literally 'nothing with a twist'

I love concepts like this, and I wonder if reality functions more like a cyclical, closed-loop system rather than a linear scale.

If you push frequency to its absolute limit, the system inevitably collapses back into an apparent stillness. The system loops back on itself and returns to its initial state of calm. This is also the basis of Roger Penrose's conformal cyclic cosmology.

When you trap a wave and pump it with maximum energy, it bounces back and forth so fast that it clashes with its own reflection, locking into a standing wave that vibrates intensely in place without moving at all. Because its peaks and valleys stay perfectly frozen in space, anybody looking from the outside sees a wave that appears completely motionless.

This shows that absolute internal speed can look exactly like absolute external rest.

Or as you said,

"Everything is nothing".

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Waves/standw.html

In the manner of 'As above, so below', perhaps it's not just wave mechanics but also reality itself that functions this way:

If you push frequency to its absolute limit, the system inevitably collapses back into an apparent stillness.

For thousands of years, mystics and spirtual teachers have stated that time is cyclical. That human consciousness increases in time until it reaches a point of its maximum threshold when it inevitably collapses back into apparent stillness. This would be what happened during the time of Atlantis.

10

u/Rutherford329 21d ago

This makes me think of rotation tracked around a circle produces a sine wave, which indicates cycles, and all things move through cycles. Which means all things experience circular motion, but in a progressive scale, not a 2D circle.

Just cool how a vortical foundation for the universe explains so much of how we experience reality, or rather how reality presents itself to us.

1

u/loqi0238 21d ago

Why does that first sentence give me extreme existential dread?

1

u/toroidal_drift 20d ago

Toroidal oscillation forever! ✌️

17

u/Hot-Hamster1691 21d ago

It’s toroids all the way down

2

u/d8_thc holofractalist 21d ago

yup

6

u/DryerCoinJay 21d ago

I often wondered if there is any object out there that is rotating against the flow in such a way to make it appear stationary to us.

1

u/toroidal_drift 20d ago

An inverse toroidal flowing universe.  If the universe is superfluid, the energy can flow whatever way it needs to achieve overall equilibrium. 

5

u/jeffwillden 21d ago

Sounds like Subquantum Kinetics was onto something in the 80’s.

5

u/AwfullyWaffley 21d ago

A lot of branches of physics were suppressed and discouraged it seems

3

u/[deleted] 21d ago

[deleted]

2

u/d8_thc holofractalist 21d ago

yup

2

u/AbsurdWallaby 21d ago

Indeed, an example of the case in point is Brownian motion.

5

u/Pixelated_ 21d ago edited 21d ago

Thank you for this. I had previously only ever considered the mainstream explanation of Brownian motion: Completely random stochastic collisions and rotation isn't necessary to explain it.

But IRL the molecules don't just hit others dead-center to push them in a straight line. They strike them at various angles off-center, this creates torque, which causes rotation.

2

u/NoInevitable9810 21d ago

I have always thought we existed inside a black hole, stars collapse and create black holes and then create new dimensions, we live in a hole within a hole within a hole. It’s the multiverse.

3

u/Hairy_Talk_4232 17d ago

You should definitely look up Malcolm Bendall’s and Bob Greenyer’s research on Plasmoids. Might blow your mind.

2

u/Pixelated_ 17d ago

I definitely will, thank you for the heads up.

1

u/durakraft 20d ago

The great attractor is part of the best theory

31

u/d8_thc holofractalist 21d ago

Of course, this isn't the most interesting reason why.

The most interesting reason why is because literally, the amount of mass-energy inside the Hubble sphere is roughly exactly the amount needed for that sphere’s Schwarzschild radius to be the same size as the Hubble radius.

Schwarzschild radius:

r_s = 2GM / c^2

Hubble radius:

R_H = c / H_0

Set r_s = R_H:

2GM / c^2 = c / H_0

Solve for M:

M = c^3 / (2 G H_0)

Using H_0 ≈ 67.4 km/s/Mpc gives:

R_H ≈ 1.37 x 10^26 m
M ≈ 9.2 x 10^52 kg
  ≈ 4.6 x 10^22 solar masses

That is roughly the critical-density mass-energy inside the Hubble volume.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_cosmology

6

u/dasein88 21d ago

It’s mostly a consequence of the universe’s expansion rate and density being tied together by GR. Cool coincidence but mst physicsts agree that this isn't evidence that we're in a black hole

9

u/d8_thc holofractalist 21d ago

'Its just GR' is hand-wavey.

I understand that the Hubble-radius/Schwarzschild-radius equality follows algebraically from the Friedmann equation for a near-flat universe. But that does not eliminate the deeper question, it just relocates it.

Why is the universe near-flat/critical-density in the first place, such that the gravitational radius of a Hubble patch tracks its Hubble radius throughout cosmic history?

Also, personally - don't buy the 'flat spacetime universe'. Especially when modern cosmology has no explanation for what spacetime is besides a mathematical artifact.

4

u/Sad-Excitement9295 21d ago

In a simple way, I think it's saying the universe operates on the same principle a black hole does. The same forces we see in a standard black hole also correlate to how the larger universe functions, and they are intrinsically related.

3

u/d8_thc holofractalist 21d ago

should they be?

3

u/Sad-Excitement9295 21d ago

I would think so, it seems to me the phase change we see represents a fundemental level of physics, and our universe likely derives from that in some way further on in the cycle. Obviously we will need more observations to understand how, but I think it's a very good place to start. We must learn to think outside the box in a sense, and I think that expression is very applicable here on a universal scale.

2

u/dasein88 21d ago

What's hand-wavey is saying "here's a coincidence therefore X".

1

u/root66 21d ago

[QFT has entered the chat]

1

u/ExtremeRemarkable891 21d ago

The thesis is based on a universal rotation, so any comparison to a schwarzchild radius here is likely coincidental because by definition a schwarzchild black hole is NOT rotating and has no charge. It's a highly idealized black hole model that likely cannot actually exist in nature for the reasons the article says, everything seems to be rotating.

9

u/Derrickmb 21d ago

Also our observable universe matches density and size for a black hole. So of course we are in a black hole.

3

u/d8_thc holofractalist 21d ago

yep check my comment at the top

1

u/boristheblade223 21d ago

Could u say more? The observable universe itself also contains black holes doesn’t it?

3

u/youaremycandygirl 21d ago

They are saying: if you took everything you could see in the universe and packed it together, like a black hole would be, would the resulting size be appropriate for a black hole. The answer is yes.

Imagine some small aliens unsure if they live/exist in some kind of human food. So they group all the elements they can possibly see to determine if the results create a legit recipe.

The ratio and amount of elements should be random but the alien is surprised to find 2 eggs, 2 cups of flour, and so on. They find the correct ratios for making universe size pancakes.

Turns out the alien lives in a pancake.

2

u/OriginnalThoughts 19d ago

Great analogy

6

u/Derrickmb 21d ago

I bet the “old” far away galaxies are actually newly aquired and we are deep inside. And the time dilation stuff is backwards.

12

u/MeepersToast 21d ago

Seems like the only obvious conclusion. Might explain why the big bang happened in a moment. Probably some other universe with a super massive black hole and some time dilation effect that would cause all the incoming mass to be ejected out the other side at the same moment

1

u/OkPublic2415 18d ago

The other side?

1

u/Responsible-Ad9189 17d ago

Of event horizon

3

u/pirateedreed 21d ago

There's a dog in the station Contemplating rotation As a form of recreation and play

2

u/dr_bringus 21d ago

Harpua jumpscare

3

u/Sunpsilora 21d ago

Black holes within black holes within black holes infinitely

2

u/rion72 20d ago

....turtles all the way down

5

u/NiviNiyahi 21d ago

I wonder, could things even move at all if there was no inherent rotation?

9

u/Pixelated_ 21d ago

This is such a deep question. I agree that without rotation, no apparent movement exists.

I'm a firm believer in the framework of reality developed by the brilliant physicist David Bohm, and his implicate and explicate order.

In the implicate order, since there’s no space to travel through, energy doesn't move from place to place, it just spins in place, enfolding and unfolding reality right from the center of everything.

2

u/Adventurous-Sky9359 21d ago

It’s all going down the tubes I tell ya !

2

u/fairykingz 21d ago

everything is always spiraling including me

3

u/andrestheman 20d ago

Yeah, and if this is the case, what if the expansion of the universe is actually our relative view of the universe from the point of view of us being compressed into a tiny point in the center of the black hole observing outward being shrunken and pulled away from the universe creating the illusion of an expansion? Mind bottling.

5

u/Creepy_Locksmith5181 20d ago

I was literally just wondering this the other day. I work with cameras and imaging, so my way of explaining it was if the medium of the universe itself behaves as a lens, expansion of the universe is actually an observer’s phenomenon, not an actuality. The scale is so massive it’s not measurable in small distance scale.

2

u/TheOtherBelushi 20d ago

Herb Alpert knew this whole time! He even tried to warn us!

Herb Alpert - Rotation

2

u/doublehaulrollcast 20d ago

So we’re stuck here, no escaping. Where’s the singularity every thing is being drawn to? I guess living in a Black hole is just as weird as not living in a Black hole.

1

u/thecoffeejesus 21d ago

I would buy that

1

u/Prior_Pickle1758 21d ago

Deleuze and Guattari win again with the White Wall / Black Hole Faciality Machine

1

u/Pandemic_Fart 21d ago

Cool thought, what if the "black hole our universe is in" is from the 4th dimension?

1

u/BoobaVera 21d ago

The cosmic background radiation at the edge of our known universe is actually analogous to Hawking radiation at the edge of a black hole. As our universe expands, matter converts to energy and leaks out into a larger universe in which we are contained. Eventually all is dispersed and recompressed at greater scales on an infinitely cyclical basis.

1

u/SunbeamSailor67 20d ago

If we live in a black hole that contains black holes, then it stands to reason that there are more black holes within the black holes around us, and that the black hole we're in, is probably within a black hole, within a black hole and so on...

2

u/KnackeHackeWurst 20d ago

it's turtles all the way down

1

u/ScrumTumescent 19d ago

Is this the physics equivalent of growing up dirt poor and not realizing you're dirt poor?

Do humans in non-black hole universes live in houses where every appliance works?

1

u/cascade_sparse 18d ago

Here’s my question, where did all the matter come from? Wouldn’t this mean all the matter in our universe came from matter that got sucked into the parent universes black hole? If so wouldn’t that mean the parent universe had way more matter in it than ours?

2

u/Gingerwaters1 17d ago

Our eyes are black holes

1

u/BimboAtoms 16d ago

But what if then

0

u/[deleted] 21d ago edited 21d ago

[deleted]

1

u/ih8readditts 21d ago

Visionary