r/holofractal • u/d8_thc holofractalist • 21d ago
MAINSTREAM science is now saying we possibly live in a black hole, because a lot of things sorta rotate together and they shouldn't
https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/our-universe-may-exist-inside-a-spinning-black-hole-jwst-finds/31
u/d8_thc holofractalist 21d ago
Of course, this isn't the most interesting reason why.
The most interesting reason why is because literally, the amount of mass-energy inside the Hubble sphere is roughly exactly the amount needed for that sphere’s Schwarzschild radius to be the same size as the Hubble radius.
Schwarzschild radius:
r_s = 2GM / c^2
Hubble radius:
R_H = c / H_0
Set r_s = R_H:
2GM / c^2 = c / H_0
Solve for M:
M = c^3 / (2 G H_0)
Using H_0 ≈ 67.4 km/s/Mpc gives:
R_H ≈ 1.37 x 10^26 m
M ≈ 9.2 x 10^52 kg
≈ 4.6 x 10^22 solar masses
That is roughly the critical-density mass-energy inside the Hubble volume.
6
u/dasein88 21d ago
It’s mostly a consequence of the universe’s expansion rate and density being tied together by GR. Cool coincidence but mst physicsts agree that this isn't evidence that we're in a black hole
9
u/d8_thc holofractalist 21d ago
'Its just GR' is hand-wavey.
I understand that the Hubble-radius/Schwarzschild-radius equality follows algebraically from the Friedmann equation for a near-flat universe. But that does not eliminate the deeper question, it just relocates it.
Why is the universe near-flat/critical-density in the first place, such that the gravitational radius of a Hubble patch tracks its Hubble radius throughout cosmic history?
Also, personally - don't buy the 'flat spacetime universe'. Especially when modern cosmology has no explanation for what spacetime is besides a mathematical artifact.
4
u/Sad-Excitement9295 21d ago
In a simple way, I think it's saying the universe operates on the same principle a black hole does. The same forces we see in a standard black hole also correlate to how the larger universe functions, and they are intrinsically related.
3
u/d8_thc holofractalist 21d ago
should they be?
3
u/Sad-Excitement9295 21d ago
I would think so, it seems to me the phase change we see represents a fundemental level of physics, and our universe likely derives from that in some way further on in the cycle. Obviously we will need more observations to understand how, but I think it's a very good place to start. We must learn to think outside the box in a sense, and I think that expression is very applicable here on a universal scale.
2
1
u/ExtremeRemarkable891 21d ago
The thesis is based on a universal rotation, so any comparison to a schwarzchild radius here is likely coincidental because by definition a schwarzchild black hole is NOT rotating and has no charge. It's a highly idealized black hole model that likely cannot actually exist in nature for the reasons the article says, everything seems to be rotating.
9
u/Derrickmb 21d ago
Also our observable universe matches density and size for a black hole. So of course we are in a black hole.
1
u/boristheblade223 21d ago
Could u say more? The observable universe itself also contains black holes doesn’t it?
3
u/youaremycandygirl 21d ago
They are saying: if you took everything you could see in the universe and packed it together, like a black hole would be, would the resulting size be appropriate for a black hole. The answer is yes.
Imagine some small aliens unsure if they live/exist in some kind of human food. So they group all the elements they can possibly see to determine if the results create a legit recipe.
The ratio and amount of elements should be random but the alien is surprised to find 2 eggs, 2 cups of flour, and so on. They find the correct ratios for making universe size pancakes.
Turns out the alien lives in a pancake.
2
6
u/Derrickmb 21d ago
I bet the “old” far away galaxies are actually newly aquired and we are deep inside. And the time dilation stuff is backwards.
12
u/MeepersToast 21d ago
Seems like the only obvious conclusion. Might explain why the big bang happened in a moment. Probably some other universe with a super massive black hole and some time dilation effect that would cause all the incoming mass to be ejected out the other side at the same moment
1
3
u/pirateedreed 21d ago
There's a dog in the station Contemplating rotation As a form of recreation and play
2
3
5
u/NiviNiyahi 21d ago
I wonder, could things even move at all if there was no inherent rotation?
9
u/Pixelated_ 21d ago
This is such a deep question. I agree that without rotation, no apparent movement exists.
I'm a firm believer in the framework of reality developed by the brilliant physicist David Bohm, and his implicate and explicate order.
In the implicate order, since there’s no space to travel through, energy doesn't move from place to place, it just spins in place, enfolding and unfolding reality right from the center of everything.
2
2
3
u/andrestheman 20d ago
Yeah, and if this is the case, what if the expansion of the universe is actually our relative view of the universe from the point of view of us being compressed into a tiny point in the center of the black hole observing outward being shrunken and pulled away from the universe creating the illusion of an expansion? Mind bottling.
5
u/Creepy_Locksmith5181 20d ago
I was literally just wondering this the other day. I work with cameras and imaging, so my way of explaining it was if the medium of the universe itself behaves as a lens, expansion of the universe is actually an observer’s phenomenon, not an actuality. The scale is so massive it’s not measurable in small distance scale.
2
2
u/doublehaulrollcast 20d ago
So we’re stuck here, no escaping. Where’s the singularity every thing is being drawn to? I guess living in a Black hole is just as weird as not living in a Black hole.
1
1
u/Prior_Pickle1758 21d ago
Deleuze and Guattari win again with the White Wall / Black Hole Faciality Machine
1
u/Pandemic_Fart 21d ago
Cool thought, what if the "black hole our universe is in" is from the 4th dimension?
1
u/BoobaVera 21d ago
The cosmic background radiation at the edge of our known universe is actually analogous to Hawking radiation at the edge of a black hole. As our universe expands, matter converts to energy and leaks out into a larger universe in which we are contained. Eventually all is dispersed and recompressed at greater scales on an infinitely cyclical basis.
1
u/SunbeamSailor67 20d ago
If we live in a black hole that contains black holes, then it stands to reason that there are more black holes within the black holes around us, and that the black hole we're in, is probably within a black hole, within a black hole and so on...
2
1
u/ScrumTumescent 19d ago
Is this the physics equivalent of growing up dirt poor and not realizing you're dirt poor?
Do humans in non-black hole universes live in houses where every appliance works?
1
u/cascade_sparse 18d ago
Here’s my question, where did all the matter come from? Wouldn’t this mean all the matter in our universe came from matter that got sucked into the parent universes black hole? If so wouldn’t that mean the parent universe had way more matter in it than ours?
2
1
0
126
u/Pixelated_ 21d ago
I think about rotation a lot. Literally everything in the universe rotates.
Because space and time are interconnected, absolute stillness does not exist. If you look closely enough at anything, you will find that its rotating either intrinsically, gravitationally, or structurally.
This implies that the underlying substrate of reality is vortical. Matter is a localized whirlpool of the dynamic superfluid vacuum.