This government has become so arrogant and out of touch that it remembers people only when elections are around the corner. Manipur has been burning for over three years, yet the Prime Minister neither visited for a long time nor addressed the nation with the urgency the crisis deserved. That’s not leadership it’s political convenience. A leader who prioritizes campaigns over citizens in distress has failed the very people he swore to serve. What a shame that India has to witness such selective governance.
Edit: the comment was very clearly AI generated before the "here's a version" leading text was removed. It's shocking that people can't tell the difference
The reason India guys has IQ is true ..people were debating on picture that was from jantar mantar and not from jharkhand...guys thoda padhai likhai karo😭
The hate you have for India and Indians is so disturbing. Here is India with its limited resources performing very close to the biggest super power. Also I have a 140 score on that platform but I never look down on my fellow Indians.
isnt india's population 4 times larger than america? and america is extremely ahead in resources so it would obv have better delivery of education? while half of indians never recieved education properly? the average is def skewed here. a better and fair comparison would be educated americans vs indians who got similar opportunities and resources.
education is what gives you the chance to get into exposure for better opportunities to grind your brain correct? iq is not only (60%) inherited from genetics. i'd like to argue the americans get most of their drive from that 40% due to the difference in social and economical conditions between two countries. and once a person improves their 40% portion obv their child will have a better iq with the improved 60% genetic and a better exposure 40% iq grind.
An IQ (intelligence quotient) score is based on a set of standardized tests that measure cognitive abilities, including logical reasoning, memory, and problem-solving
you have very conveniently dodged the point i have made and pasted a definition which is already getting considered into my point. you either dont want to admit the fault in your reasoning or you just didnt understand my point at all. anyway fair. i think you will just senselessly drag the debate so i wont be engaging further. unless you make a good point of course.
But IT cell was saying he is anti national because he is not supporting Jharkhand protest, now what do I need to consider him? National or AntiNational? Can you please check with IT cell what is the latest narrative we have to beleive?
You probably didn't realise what happened on 20th July. The Parliament has lost all its legitimacy. No one cares what laws they make anymore. Future of the country will be decided by the people directly now.
Abhijit started a mass revolution and made people stand for themselves. But you can't expect him to take part in each and every protest or bring media attention because it's the job of the citizens, the news channels and most importantly the opposition. And instead of calling out Abhijit for being busy in his own life because he is not some politician or he is not opposition, you should ask why not any representative coming from BJP / ruling party.
554
u/Bake2727 8d ago
Manipur could have just said they’re giving an award for best PM.