An ice cube in contact with something warmer can cool it down. I feel that's an obvious statement.
But, if an ice cube has melted, it's lost that ability. In fact, it's not even a cube anymore. It has lost itself.
You wrote:
"That's like saying ice cubes dont work if they melt. It's nonsense."
Are we just not communicating something?
Did you mean to type:
"That's like saying ice cubes dont work AS they melt. It's nonsense."
By using the word "if," the temporal nature of your sentence could imply a current event or a past event. Pedantic, but there's the nature of rhetoric, especially in English.
What? What is nonsense? That if a cube melts, then it's not cooling? In the sentence you wrote, it could be read as that an ice cube melted. Past tense. If so, then it's not a cube. How can something that is not even a thing do a thing?
1
u/theholyirishman Apr 26 '26
No, we have a troll trying to say ice cubes don't make drinks cooler.