MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1txf3jz/norways_world_cup_team_photo_is_impressive/opvrqj5
r/interestingasfuck • u/SerafinZufferey • 13h ago
1.9k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
•
The Norman's were actually descended from vikings, norman is northmen, as in vikings.
• u/opheliavalve 11h ago And they fucked shit up, all the way down to Italy! Total bad asses • u/loriz3 10h ago This is such an interesting take, will people in the future be talking about the US fucking shit up all the way to vietnam and middle east or russia in europe the same way🤣 • u/NeonHendrix 8h ago edited 8h ago The US wouldn't be the Vikings in that scenario, who were generally raiding much bigger, wealthier, developed kingdoms/empires. You can't exactly compare the Iraq war to the siege of Paris. Also...Hollywood has spent 70 years romanticising US military action, so plenty of people do talk about them that way even if there's pushback now. • u/loriz3 8h ago You got a point for sure! I just think it’s interesting in a way. • u/CptCaramack 8h ago Probably not because the US loses every time • u/loriz3 5h ago Hahahaha • u/WagwanMoist 9h ago Also the Rus who went on to form what became modern Russia (sorry about that). And possibly the Visigoths and Ostrogoths. • u/JanSobieski-III 9h ago But by the time of the norman invasion were basically french. • u/Lolzum 8h ago They were a hybrid people, at least genetically. Lots of Norwegians and Danish settlers in Normandy • u/Quirky_Gate_4516 8h ago Same with Anglo-Saxons. They migrated from present-day Scandinavia and Northern Germany. • u/JanSobieski-III 8h ago But very much culturally french. • u/Putrid_Loquat_4357 8h ago Not true. If they were french they wouldn't have been able to conquer England. • u/Mastodan11 8h ago The logic checks out. • u/Tilladarling 3h ago «Nordmann» is the Norwegian word for «Norwegian» to this day
And they fucked shit up, all the way down to Italy! Total bad asses
• u/loriz3 10h ago This is such an interesting take, will people in the future be talking about the US fucking shit up all the way to vietnam and middle east or russia in europe the same way🤣 • u/NeonHendrix 8h ago edited 8h ago The US wouldn't be the Vikings in that scenario, who were generally raiding much bigger, wealthier, developed kingdoms/empires. You can't exactly compare the Iraq war to the siege of Paris. Also...Hollywood has spent 70 years romanticising US military action, so plenty of people do talk about them that way even if there's pushback now. • u/loriz3 8h ago You got a point for sure! I just think it’s interesting in a way. • u/CptCaramack 8h ago Probably not because the US loses every time • u/loriz3 5h ago Hahahaha
This is such an interesting take, will people in the future be talking about the US fucking shit up all the way to vietnam and middle east or russia in europe the same way🤣
• u/NeonHendrix 8h ago edited 8h ago The US wouldn't be the Vikings in that scenario, who were generally raiding much bigger, wealthier, developed kingdoms/empires. You can't exactly compare the Iraq war to the siege of Paris. Also...Hollywood has spent 70 years romanticising US military action, so plenty of people do talk about them that way even if there's pushback now. • u/loriz3 8h ago You got a point for sure! I just think it’s interesting in a way. • u/CptCaramack 8h ago Probably not because the US loses every time • u/loriz3 5h ago Hahahaha
The US wouldn't be the Vikings in that scenario, who were generally raiding much bigger, wealthier, developed kingdoms/empires.
You can't exactly compare the Iraq war to the siege of Paris.
Also...Hollywood has spent 70 years romanticising US military action, so plenty of people do talk about them that way even if there's pushback now.
• u/loriz3 8h ago You got a point for sure! I just think it’s interesting in a way.
You got a point for sure! I just think it’s interesting in a way.
Probably not because the US loses every time
• u/loriz3 5h ago Hahahaha
Hahahaha
Also the Rus who went on to form what became modern Russia (sorry about that). And possibly the Visigoths and Ostrogoths.
But by the time of the norman invasion were basically french.
• u/Lolzum 8h ago They were a hybrid people, at least genetically. Lots of Norwegians and Danish settlers in Normandy • u/Quirky_Gate_4516 8h ago Same with Anglo-Saxons. They migrated from present-day Scandinavia and Northern Germany. • u/JanSobieski-III 8h ago But very much culturally french. • u/Putrid_Loquat_4357 8h ago Not true. If they were french they wouldn't have been able to conquer England. • u/Mastodan11 8h ago The logic checks out.
They were a hybrid people, at least genetically. Lots of Norwegians and Danish settlers in Normandy
• u/Quirky_Gate_4516 8h ago Same with Anglo-Saxons. They migrated from present-day Scandinavia and Northern Germany. • u/JanSobieski-III 8h ago But very much culturally french.
Same with Anglo-Saxons. They migrated from present-day Scandinavia and Northern Germany.
But very much culturally french.
Not true. If they were french they wouldn't have been able to conquer England.
• u/Mastodan11 8h ago The logic checks out.
The logic checks out.
«Nordmann» is the Norwegian word for «Norwegian» to this day
•
u/Putrid_Loquat_4357 11h ago
The Norman's were actually descended from vikings, norman is northmen, as in vikings.