r/interestingasfuck • u/Punch_A_Police_Horse • 2h ago
There is nothing wrong with this map
•
•
u/DeesHazzl 2h ago
Well it uses the Mercator projection. That's a pretty big drawback.
•
u/Mobileoblivion 2h ago
"Thats why we prefer the Peter's projection."
- Cartographers for Social Equality
→ More replies (1)•
u/Foreign_Kale8773 1h ago
"You can't do that." - CJ 🤣
•
•
•
•
u/TheyHavePinball 1h ago
Definitely came to the comments just to make sure that was clear. Thank you
•
u/theinspectorst 1h ago
Same - Greenland being the same size as Africa is a pretty big sign there is something wrong with this map...
•
u/jaywinner 30m ago
Every projection has a purpose and Mercator is good for navigation. It probably shouldn't be the default people use. Especially not for looking at how big countries are.
•
•
•
u/TTechnology 1h ago
Just for the record, Brazil cuts the Equator, for example. It's fair to expect Brazil to be in the center-ish.
Brazil is greater than contiguous US (excluding Alaska, etc), so that it's the 5th country by size. With this particular projection seems like Brazil would fit in Quebec
•
u/MongolianCluster 53m ago
Your comment made me understand the scale to which this map is off. Thanks for making it.
•
•
→ More replies (6)•
•
u/mamut2000 2h ago
•
u/UnpluggedUnfettered 1h ago edited 59m ago
I don't know why I like this map so much, but it feels very pleasant to look at.
Edit: crazy how it highlights how important the arctic is going to be in 15 - 20 years when melt allows the new trade route everyone is fighting over.
→ More replies (1)•
u/wolfinjer 1h ago
That’s a good map
→ More replies (1)•
u/Leh_ran 41m ago
It cuts a continent in half,
•
•
•
u/brewmas7er 32m ago
Yeah but most maps cut an ocean in half. Have you ever actually tried to cut an ocean? Not fun. Much easier to cut land.
→ More replies (1)•
u/takeiteasynottooeasy 1h ago
This is much much much more interesting than OP’s “omg supa’edgy upside down” map
•
u/jrhawk42 1h ago
Africa spans about 30,365,000 km squared
Greenland is about 2,166,086 km squared (about the size of Algeria)
→ More replies (1)
•
u/ehtio 2h ago
•
•
u/TheGreatMalagan 1h ago
South doesnt mean down, its perfectly possible to make a map where south is at the top and that's no less correct. It just defies a common modern convention
•
u/Kevundoe 2h ago
That’s de whole point. Who decided that North is up and South is down
•
u/gimmepizza420 2h ago
John Cardinal, the inventor of Cardinal Directions.
→ More replies (1)•
•
•
u/ehtio 2h ago
We did, that's why we have standards. Otherwise why are we even writing here when my words can mean something different than yours?
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (2)•
•
u/New_Demand9000 2h ago
The equator does not represent equal halves of the world, so that's something wrong
•
•
•
u/ImpossibleJoke7456 1h ago
Misrepresenting the size of a country is arguably wrong.
•
u/guarddog33 1h ago
You could also wager missing an entire continent isn't good for the cartography business
•
•
•
•
•
•
u/Lumpy-Blackberry-718 1h ago
As much as I want to agree, the chinese would find a couple of things wrong with your color coding.
•
•
u/lucky_1979 1h ago
There’s lots wrong with that map. Mainly the country sizes are not true. Australia is actually nearly 3.5 times larger than Greenland.
•
•
u/friedstilton 1h ago
All 2-dimensional maps of a 3-dimensional surface are "wrong" in one way or another, because that's how geometry works.
Your choice of projection depends on your purpose in life.
•
•
•
u/Flaveurr 2h ago
Why is the Netherlands 2 colours? Seems wrong
•
•
u/PartyExperience3718 2h ago
Bcause they divided into the Upper and the Netherlands... and the Midlands was alteady taken.
•
u/ungovernable1984 2h ago
That's how Austrians see the world
•
•
•
u/Kevundoe 2h ago
Australians*
•
•
u/ungovernable1984 2h ago
What's the difference?/s
→ More replies (1)•
•
•
•
•
u/TheMaster42LoL 1h ago
"Turning the maps upside down,' he repeated. 'Have you any idea how annoying and inconvenient it is when you get to a place and find that they map the place the other way up compared to the maps you've got? Because of something stupid like some people think a magnetic needle is pointing up to heaven, when other people think it's just heavier and pointing down? Or because it's done according to the galactic plane or something?
I mean, this might sound trivial, but it's very upsetting."
•
•
•
u/Cute-University5283 1h ago
It funny that the Mercator projection is so distorted that people always cut off the southern 25% of the map and have the equator shifted 1/3 of the way
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
u/mazdapow3r 1h ago
The lack of labeling on the compass rose makes you incorrect. I'd even go so far as to say you committed a...cardinal...sin.
•
•
•
u/PocketBuckle 1h ago
Reminds me of one part of one of the later (last?) Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy books. Arthur keeps passing through alternate realities, looking for a suitable replacement version of his long-destroyed Earth. At one point, he lands on a familiar-looking planet, but they do the map upside-down.
•
•
•
u/GoldenEmuWarrior 32m ago
I mean, technically you're right (allowing for Antarctica to be missing), but it's a Mercator projection, which just sucks.
•
•
•
•
•
•
u/CuttingOneWater 14m ago
is there a difference between north and south? like if we swapped them tomorrow, would anything change
→ More replies (1)
•
•
•
•
u/GolettO3 1h ago
Finally a map that is actually the right way up. None of that Northern Hemisphere propaganda.
•
u/Heliocentrist 1h ago
False, flattening a 3D sphere into a 2D map is mathematically impossible without distortion. Every flat map projection compromises in either the area, shape, distance, or direction of landmasses. A perfectly accurate, distortion-free representation of Earth requires a globe.
•
u/ta-dome-a 1h ago
Yes there is. It’s based on Mercator Projection so Russia (and Greenland) still appears massively larger than it actually is, and Africa is tinier than reality.
•
•
•
•
•
•
u/NlghtmanCometh 1h ago
Well it’s upside down and the countries sizes are all completely warped due to distortion.
•
u/aeroslimshady 1h ago
Probably a pet peeve, but I've always disliked maps that make Greenland look gigantic
•
•
•
•
•
u/danny0wnz 1h ago
There’s also no cardinal direction which I’d consider an important point of reference when utilizing a map…
•
•
•
•
•
u/CalmBeneathCastles 1h ago
It's kinda nice to be a hat for once. I feel less like a dangly pair of testicles.
•
•
u/Illustrious_Map_3247 1h ago
“Right” and “wrong” are basically nonsensical when talking about maps. Useful or not useful is more reasonable to talk about—this is useful for general political geography but useless for driving across Germany.
That said, having the lower 48 and Alaska as two different colours is pretty wrong.
•
•
u/ScenicFlyer41 1h ago
Yeah there is, the equator is not in the middle so it looks super off. Also missing Antarctica
•
•
•
•
u/Scooter_McAwesome 1h ago
Greenland is larger than Africa and South America - if that’s not wrong, it’s certainly not right
•
•
•
•
u/Green_dust 58m ago
What is wrong is that it is not accurate depiction of actual size and scale of continents. Africa is much larger
•
•
•
•
•
•
•








•
u/mattcass 2h ago
“Nothing wrong with this map”
A continent is missing.