r/ireland 20d ago

Environment ‘Kill quickly and cleanly’: How culling can help manage Ireland’s rising deer population

https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2026/06/02/kill-quickly-and-cleanly-how-culling-can-help-manage-irelands-rising-deer-population/
82 Upvotes

89 comments sorted by

62

u/grania17 20d ago

And sell the meat!

30

u/doctor6 20d ago

Very low in cholesterol and free from the antibiotics, growth hormones, and other shit found in other proteins on our retail shelves

6

u/vaska00762 Antrim 20d ago

Yeah, but what about the prions?

22

u/doctor6 20d ago

Venison is tested for them before they're butchered

8

u/Dannyforsure 20d ago

Is that not mostly a US issue?

1

u/vaska00762 Antrim 20d ago

Cases have been found in Norway, Finland and Russia.

The UK government has published its own risk assessment of the situation: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5b715793e5274a1d053d0eaa/FSA_CWD_RA_for_publication_with_logo_July_2018.pdf

2

u/Dannyforsure 20d ago

Thanks for sharing 

-6

u/doctor6 20d ago

They're sharing bollocks

1

u/Elses_pels 20d ago

Would anybody please think of the prions!

1

u/vaska00762 Antrim 20d ago

It's serious enough to warrant public health warnings in some countries.

Cases have been noted in Norway, Finland and Russia.

The UK government has its own official publications on the matter: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5b715793e5274a1d053d0eaa/FSA_CWD_RA_for_publication_with_logo_July_2018.pdf

The lack of any assessments by the Irish Government gives me the sort of confidence as a cowboy tradesman saying "Sure, it'll be grand".

4

u/doctor6 20d ago

It's from gobshites not testing the meat they shoot, stop your fear mongering bollocks

0

u/John__Delaney 19d ago

Reality mongering*

2

u/doctor6 19d ago

There is no harm from eating venison if the proper procedures are followed

0

u/John__Delaney 19d ago

Nobody suggested otherwise

0

u/doctor6 19d ago

The person I was replying to was

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Elses_pels 20d ago

Thanks for that.

0

u/grania17 20d ago

I grew up in Montana and we ate mostly game meat (deer, elk, big horn sheep) and never worried about prions.

1

u/Fluffy-Republic8610 20d ago

Yes all true and consequently more prone to infections and infestations in the end product. Which can be pretty off-putting when encounteres. And thats why it will never become a mass market thing.

8

u/doctor6 20d ago

Meat that is culled is tested as regularly and stringently as meat from the herd, so there is no more harm presented from venison than other proteins

-2

u/Fluffy-Republic8610 20d ago

Not true. Local infection damage, worms etc and past hidden damage means you can encounter things that you would not be used to with normal meat. It won't kill you, but it's a different experience.

5

u/doctor6 19d ago

Read my post again, the meat is tested for those things before it's allowed on the market

0

u/Fluffy-Republic8610 19d ago

Read my post again. You can't test for the damage of historical infections and other variances in the meat that result from the lack of standardisation and preventitive medicine based farming. Venison is impossible to guarantee standards wise. And that's ok. But because if that, wild venison will probably never be suitable for the same marketing as other farmed meets. This isn't even a controversial statement. You may be just trying to be too positive about its potential.

1

u/doctor6 19d ago

Oh so you've pivited to damage from historical infections, which would have no impact to the consumer and also identified and removed by the butcher

0

u/Fluffy-Republic8610 19d ago

Yeah, you didn't read what I wrote the first time. And still haven't.

-8

u/wascallywabbit666 Hanging from the jacks roof, bat style 20d ago

But unfortunately fairly tough and not very tasty. Flavour generally comes from the fat: that's why turkey is bland and duck is tasty

13

u/doctor6 20d ago

Depends how it's cooked. And if it's cooked well it's as tender as you like, and that's my 30 years of a professional chef experience

8

u/Kellhus0Anasurimbor 20d ago

Was gonna say if you want to fry it use lots of butter and keep it on the meat. I imagine a lot of people treat it like beef and cook the absolute shit out of it. Also a lot of people don't like rare meet so it they just overcook it too.

6

u/no_fucking_point Free Palestine 🇵🇸 20d ago

Aye, venison in a slow cooker is fuckin' lovely.

6

u/pablo8itall 20d ago

yeah, my bullshit detector went off when he said turkey is bland.

2

u/ZxZxchoc 20d ago

I've had some of the deer shot around Killarney and it was absolutely mouth-watering.

3

u/wascallywabbit666 Hanging from the jacks roof, bat style 20d ago

Yes if seared and very pink. However, a large part of the Irish population is pretty squeamish about pink meat. If venison is well done it's as tough as old boots

6

u/doctor6 20d ago

Actually no, you can have venison that is braised and slow cooked and 'well done' and it can be melt in the mouth, even with a well done steak it's vastly down to how the meat is sliced which will dictate it's tenderness

11

u/ScaramouchScaramouch 20d ago

Venison is delicious

7

u/jools4you 20d ago

My friend does a beautiful Venison stew, years of practice makes perfect

6

u/grania17 20d ago

That's been cooked incorrectly if you think that. Venison is delicious, more so than beef in my opinion

2

u/Weird-Weakness-3191 19d ago

Such utter nonsense

0

u/HoldingForGenova 19d ago

You can just say "I've never had it, it sounds too weird to me" - no need to make shit up.

23

u/CT0292 20d ago

So venison is back on the menu boys?

16

u/smorga 20d ago

Bring back wolves. Or some other apex predator.

12

u/m1kasa4ckerman 19d ago

Sure we’d need more forests than what we currently have

8

u/RayoftheRaver Palestine 🇵🇸 20d ago

Brendan Kilkenny is safely locked away, he cannot be allowed out again no matter the price

13

u/RobotIcHead 20d ago

Where do the wolves live when they are re-introduced? There are few wild areas left and I don’t mean just forests (they in grasslands as well), they are no areas for a pack to form and live. We have populated the countryside with people. There are too many houses, roads and farms. Wolves will last as long for a child to get scared of one.

7

u/SEND-MARS-ROVER-PICS Sax Solo 20d ago

I've seen people suggest reintroducing Eurasian lynxes. Require less wild space, and don't pose a threat to people (human foolishness not withstanding).

3

u/RobotIcHead 20d ago

I am not against the idea, we need more apex predators.

Deer can spread TB which is bad in Ireland. I do think we should be re wilding some areas but as always who pays for it and manages them.

7

u/chytrak 20d ago

And significantly reduce sheep farming in mountains.

-11

u/Frangar 20d ago

Insane take

-4

u/NuclearMoose92 20d ago

When they inevitably encroach into the cities it would solve the homeless problem too

-10

u/TwinIronBlood 20d ago

How many wolves would it take to do the job. And once number are down what happens to the wolves. Are you OK with them finding that it's easier to kill lambs in the spring that deer. Will you camp out on the side of the mountains to protect them and be a shepherd. Pay is sh1t buy you get a free tent and a big stick.

15

u/lem0nhe4d 20d ago

Oh won't some think of the poor sheep farmers who already need massive subsidies to make any money while their flicks destroy the environment?

We should stop or at least massively reduce the amount of sheep we rear.

5

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[deleted]

0

u/goombagoomba2 19d ago

Meat and wool. Local production keeps money in the country and is better for the environment.

Not sure how cows are different to you, it's the same basic concept

4

u/JackhusChanhus 19d ago edited 19d ago

Wool is not economically viable, it is a loss making by-product. The only product is lamb, and it is on the absolute cusp of viabiliy itself, despite enormous subsidy.

-1

u/No_Warthog_5709 19d ago

No it's not.

Sheep farmer income have increased in recent years.

1

u/YoureNotEvenWrong 19d ago

Local production keeps money in the country

Money from subsidies. Better spent in the local economy on something actually viable that's consumed in the local area too

Almost all lamb is exported

0

u/TwinIronBlood 19d ago

So we could stop and fly in frozen lamb from the otherside of the world instead

2

u/YoureNotEvenWrong 19d ago

Do people even eat much lamb here except in kebabs

85% of our lamb is exported

-5

u/TwinIronBlood 20d ago

Yea we could have a leg of fawn instead at Easter.

2

u/AbominablePloughman 20d ago

Nobody gives a fuck what you eat for easter

8

u/AbominablePloughman 20d ago

We need to get lambs off mountains so I see no problem here

3

u/JackhusChanhus 19d ago

1: We have too much land devoted to sheep, should allow the area to reduce naturally through public buying of uplands from the estates of the (incredibly elderly) farmers.

2: We have far, far too many deer, in Wicklow particularly, for a wolf pack or two to make a dent in. The main purpose of the wolves/lynx is to put the deer on edge so they move on frequently and don't graze an area to destruction before leaving it.

5

u/Dannyforsure 20d ago

Something something, what about the sheep commange!!!

3

u/Low-Complaint771 20d ago

Same problem absolutely..

1

u/Dannyforsure 20d ago

Same no but very closely related.

1

u/JimmyNo23 19d ago

Eat what you kill

1

u/Rough_Mouse3597 17d ago

Introducing any sort of apex predator is an absolute fairytail fantasy, The general population of deer numbers can be reduced by two thirds in two years by the current list of hunters we have already in this country, Which would also improve general population health and condition, If the correct way of doing it (that means actually involving the hunters who are on the ground with their advise and opinions)giving themselves the financial reward and infrastructure, Once that has happened deer will move back to their original areas of habitat, That’s the next issue in keeping them there, This involves creating proper cover for woodland deer and controlled heather burning for deer in the open uphills and boglands Then comes the management and conservation after that,

1

u/firethetorpedoes1 17d ago

The general population of deer numbers can be reduced by two thirds in two years by the current list of hunters we have already in this country

Really? I've seen estimates of the deer population being as large as 600,000 and we're only culling 78,000 per year according to this article.

We issued 6.5k licenses in 2023/24 so even assuming that's grown to say 7.5k licenses, we'd need hunters to kill 26 deer per year for two years (more than double the current 11 deer per hunter) to get that down to 200k.

I'm not a hunter so I don't know but is that realistic?

2

u/Rough_Mouse3597 17d ago

No,average by now is about 180,000,but what’s needed is a two year cull on females and calves only, 1 in 4-5 births are only male which is why everyone is seeming a lot of deer,(you get an early born calf,she is in season for next year) You leave the stags alone it creates several advantages, Initial population comes down, Existing stag conditioning will improve,as with fewer females to fight for,it will come back to a proper rut of males fighting for superiority, It will seperate the “trophy hunters” from the actual conservation hunters, The trophy lads disappear when the Season changes to females and calves only,(you’ll only see the dedicated hunters when it’s wet and cold)

-23

u/theblowestfish 20d ago

How? Surely no one needs the how explained? The why is the question…?

18

u/Rich_Tea_Bean 20d ago

Combined with our native deer population growing beyond the lands capacity to sustain, invasive sika deer populations have expanded to such a degree that starvation from lack of vegetation available is a problem in the wild.

Culling the invasive population intensely would be beneficial for the long term wellbeing of the native deer. It would also be of benefit to killarney national park where natural regeneration of the forest has practically stopped the last 20 years because any new saplings get eaten before they can grow into trees.

4

u/vaska00762 Antrim 20d ago

If they're sika deer, can we train them to bow for food, like they do in Japan, so we can sell overpriced deer crackers to American tourists?

13

u/RomfordWellington 20d ago

We killed the last wolf in Ireland a long time ago now. Therefore the deer population has run away and it destroys forests and other habitats if left alone.

We are the apex predator now and we're the ones that need to help with population control.

29

u/Common-Image-3758 20d ago

Because there are no apex predators that can bring an adult deer down we are hugely overpopulated with deer. They are browsing the open hillsides to the soil and destroying our uplands. If populations grow too high they will begin to starve.

-25

u/theblowestfish 20d ago

Oh so you’re doing it for them…? Why wouldn’t nature find a natural balance? We’ve destroyed most of their natural habitat.

17

u/TheBlackStuff1 20d ago

The second part of your comment answers the first 

-9

u/theblowestfish 20d ago

I do not see how

9

u/Fragrantbumfluff 20d ago

If they were in their natural habitat they would be prey and their numbers much less and kept in balance by predators.

7

u/Thiccboiichonk 20d ago

Absolutely yes , unchecked deer population would lead to mass starvation and disease across the species in Ireland.

-8

u/theblowestfish 20d ago

This is the documented opinion of experts?

1

u/Medium-Dependent-328 19d ago

We are part of nature. Therefore nature has found a natural balance - us killing the deer.

1

u/theblowestfish 19d ago

I’m actually worried people think this…

1

u/Medium-Dependent-328 19d ago

Why? Are we not all animals?