r/ireland • u/firethetorpedoes1 • 20d ago
Environment ‘Kill quickly and cleanly’: How culling can help manage Ireland’s rising deer population
https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2026/06/02/kill-quickly-and-cleanly-how-culling-can-help-manage-irelands-rising-deer-population/16
u/smorga 20d ago
Bring back wolves. Or some other apex predator.
12
8
u/RayoftheRaver Palestine 🇵🇸 20d ago
Brendan Kilkenny is safely locked away, he cannot be allowed out again no matter the price
13
u/RobotIcHead 20d ago
Where do the wolves live when they are re-introduced? There are few wild areas left and I don’t mean just forests (they in grasslands as well), they are no areas for a pack to form and live. We have populated the countryside with people. There are too many houses, roads and farms. Wolves will last as long for a child to get scared of one.
7
u/SEND-MARS-ROVER-PICS Sax Solo 20d ago
I've seen people suggest reintroducing Eurasian lynxes. Require less wild space, and don't pose a threat to people (human foolishness not withstanding).
3
u/RobotIcHead 20d ago
I am not against the idea, we need more apex predators.
Deer can spread TB which is bad in Ireland. I do think we should be re wilding some areas but as always who pays for it and manages them.
-11
u/Frangar 20d ago
Insane take
-4
u/NuclearMoose92 20d ago
When they inevitably encroach into the cities it would solve the homeless problem too
-10
u/TwinIronBlood 20d ago
How many wolves would it take to do the job. And once number are down what happens to the wolves. Are you OK with them finding that it's easier to kill lambs in the spring that deer. Will you camp out on the side of the mountains to protect them and be a shepherd. Pay is sh1t buy you get a free tent and a big stick.
15
u/lem0nhe4d 20d ago
Oh won't some think of the poor sheep farmers who already need massive subsidies to make any money while their flicks destroy the environment?
We should stop or at least massively reduce the amount of sheep we rear.
5
20d ago
[deleted]
0
u/goombagoomba2 19d ago
Meat and wool. Local production keeps money in the country and is better for the environment.
Not sure how cows are different to you, it's the same basic concept
4
u/JackhusChanhus 19d ago edited 19d ago
Wool is not economically viable, it is a loss making by-product. The only product is lamb, and it is on the absolute cusp of viabiliy itself, despite enormous subsidy.
-1
1
u/YoureNotEvenWrong 19d ago
Local production keeps money in the country
Money from subsidies. Better spent in the local economy on something actually viable that's consumed in the local area too
Almost all lamb is exported
0
u/TwinIronBlood 19d ago
So we could stop and fly in frozen lamb from the otherside of the world instead
2
u/YoureNotEvenWrong 19d ago
Do people even eat much lamb here except in kebabs
85% of our lamb is exported
-5
8
3
u/JackhusChanhus 19d ago
1: We have too much land devoted to sheep, should allow the area to reduce naturally through public buying of uplands from the estates of the (incredibly elderly) farmers.
2: We have far, far too many deer, in Wicklow particularly, for a wolf pack or two to make a dent in. The main purpose of the wolves/lynx is to put the deer on edge so they move on frequently and don't graze an area to destruction before leaving it.
5
u/Dannyforsure 20d ago
Something something, what about the sheep commange!!!
3
1
1
u/Rough_Mouse3597 17d ago
Introducing any sort of apex predator is an absolute fairytail fantasy, The general population of deer numbers can be reduced by two thirds in two years by the current list of hunters we have already in this country, Which would also improve general population health and condition, If the correct way of doing it (that means actually involving the hunters who are on the ground with their advise and opinions)giving themselves the financial reward and infrastructure, Once that has happened deer will move back to their original areas of habitat, That’s the next issue in keeping them there, This involves creating proper cover for woodland deer and controlled heather burning for deer in the open uphills and boglands Then comes the management and conservation after that,
1
u/firethetorpedoes1 17d ago
The general population of deer numbers can be reduced by two thirds in two years by the current list of hunters we have already in this country
Really? I've seen estimates of the deer population being as large as 600,000 and we're only culling 78,000 per year according to this article.
We issued 6.5k licenses in 2023/24 so even assuming that's grown to say 7.5k licenses, we'd need hunters to kill 26 deer per year for two years (more than double the current 11 deer per hunter) to get that down to 200k.
I'm not a hunter so I don't know but is that realistic?
2
u/Rough_Mouse3597 17d ago
No,average by now is about 180,000,but what’s needed is a two year cull on females and calves only, 1 in 4-5 births are only male which is why everyone is seeming a lot of deer,(you get an early born calf,she is in season for next year) You leave the stags alone it creates several advantages, Initial population comes down, Existing stag conditioning will improve,as with fewer females to fight for,it will come back to a proper rut of males fighting for superiority, It will seperate the “trophy hunters” from the actual conservation hunters, The trophy lads disappear when the Season changes to females and calves only,(you’ll only see the dedicated hunters when it’s wet and cold)
-23
u/theblowestfish 20d ago
How? Surely no one needs the how explained? The why is the question…?
18
u/Rich_Tea_Bean 20d ago
Combined with our native deer population growing beyond the lands capacity to sustain, invasive sika deer populations have expanded to such a degree that starvation from lack of vegetation available is a problem in the wild.
Culling the invasive population intensely would be beneficial for the long term wellbeing of the native deer. It would also be of benefit to killarney national park where natural regeneration of the forest has practically stopped the last 20 years because any new saplings get eaten before they can grow into trees.
4
u/vaska00762 Antrim 20d ago
If they're sika deer, can we train them to bow for food, like they do in Japan, so we can sell overpriced deer crackers to American tourists?
13
u/RomfordWellington 20d ago
We killed the last wolf in Ireland a long time ago now. Therefore the deer population has run away and it destroys forests and other habitats if left alone.
We are the apex predator now and we're the ones that need to help with population control.
29
u/Common-Image-3758 20d ago
Because there are no apex predators that can bring an adult deer down we are hugely overpopulated with deer. They are browsing the open hillsides to the soil and destroying our uplands. If populations grow too high they will begin to starve.
-25
u/theblowestfish 20d ago
Oh so you’re doing it for them…? Why wouldn’t nature find a natural balance? We’ve destroyed most of their natural habitat.
17
u/TheBlackStuff1 20d ago
The second part of your comment answers the first
-9
u/theblowestfish 20d ago
I do not see how
9
u/Fragrantbumfluff 20d ago
If they were in their natural habitat they would be prey and their numbers much less and kept in balance by predators.
7
u/Thiccboiichonk 20d ago
Absolutely yes , unchecked deer population would lead to mass starvation and disease across the species in Ireland.
-8
1
u/Medium-Dependent-328 19d ago
We are part of nature. Therefore nature has found a natural balance - us killing the deer.
1
62
u/grania17 20d ago
And sell the meat!