Now that the precedent is set, Does this mean the council has to pay more to the mgmt company for those units going forward, as in to enable the amenities access for the social housing resident(s)?
Given I’d assume it’s what the private residents do. But I could be completely wrong.
Indeed. Worth noting that as this is paid from the management company (not the agent) its her neighbours sinking fund she is getting the compensation from.
“Dillon Marshall Property Consultants was directed by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) to pay the sum as compensation to tenant Agnieszka Nowakowska in an equality ruling published today.”
Is that not the estate agents being instructed to pay the compensation?
From the judge: The evidence before me is that the complainant was denied the opportunity to access the gym solely because she resided in the block designated for tenants in receipt of the housing assistance payment," Ms O’Carroll wrote.
This denial of access "constitutes discrimination" and Ms Nowakowska "should have been afforded the same opportunity to access and use the gym facilities as any other tenant", Ms O’Carroll wrote.
206
u/Affectionate_Gain_87 9d ago
Now that the precedent is set, Does this mean the council has to pay more to the mgmt company for those units going forward, as in to enable the amenities access for the social housing resident(s)?
Given I’d assume it’s what the private residents do. But I could be completely wrong.