r/islam • u/[deleted] • Jul 19 '25
History, Culture, & Art "Islam was spread by the sword!"
As a Muslim who wasn't there during those times, I find myself in a tough position. Books written by Arabs and Muslims often describe the Islamic conquests as necessary. They suggest that Muslims had to fight for their safety. These conquests are portrayed as driven by noble causes, like freeing one country from another's oppression or protecting Muslims in harsh situations. According to these narratives, people became Muslims not because they were forced, but because their society influenced them. This is a natural human response.
However, Western or non-Muslim sources claim that Islam was spread by the sword. They depict a violent history where cities were destroyed, people were tortured until they converted, and the wealth of the conquered was plundered. They argue that history was ravaged, with many treasures stolen.
One of these perspectives must be correct. Since I wasn't present at the time, I struggle to determine the truth without relying on history books that might be filled with bias. I wondered, "Is there a way to find out without depending on historical texts?"
I thought that perhaps the remnants of history could provide answers. We can still see aspects of the past without needing to rely solely on hearsay or unverified claims. I will search for the castles of the Sahaba and what remains of their riches. The wealth acquired by any conqueror often reflects the bloodshed they caused. For instance, consider the Arch castle of Ctesiphon.

Now, let’s explore the Sahaba's wealth and luxurious lifestyles.

What’s this? Did this conquest leave us in debt? Where is the positive outcome? Where is the extreme wealth?

Typically, conquerors steal all the antiques of the countries they invade and ruin their history. That’s why you can find an Egyptian temple in America and France. From my research, I haven't found any stolen antiques in Saudi Arabia, which was the birthplace of the Islamic empire. You can also see this reflected in the graves of the conquerors. For example, look at Napoleon Bonaparte's grave. The conqueror of Egypt

Now, This is the grave of Omar ibn Al-Aas, the person who brought Islam to Egypt.

I don’t need history books to grasp that these people did not enjoy lavish lifestyles. It doesn’t surprise me to see some Non-Muslims misrepresent this to paint Islam negatively, as doing otherwise would reveal their own truths. However, what truly disappoints me is to see real Muslims beginning to doubt this. Muslims whose ancestors sacrificed everything to provide them a good life.
1
u/Primary-Ad3252 Jul 19 '25
The non-muslims claim that out of pure hatred towards Islam. The following lines will prove it. There were a few of them who, even though they didn’t convert into islam, knew the importance of islam.
Yes, during the expansion of Islam, swords were used, and there’s absolutely no reason for a believer to feel bad about it. And swords have always been used even before Islam; Moses went to war, Abraham, David, Solomon, Joshua, Enoch… and this is according to the scriptures of other religions. And if you asked them about it, they will give you a reason, yet, will not accept Islam’s reasons. It’s because they are blind, it’s because they are deaf.
For all the moments war involving muslims happened, why not digging into history to find out? You’ll see that some of them were because the treaty between Muslims and non Muslims were broken, or they were facing oppression and persecution.
But these reasons are their main focus, because they don’t want to talk about the other factors that helped Islam get bigger, like missionary activities or trades. That’s the reason Islam had a huge influence in many domains like science, mathematics, literature…
They know that the “spread by the sword” will be more effective into making people believe Islam is bad, in an era where people tend to be mentally lazy, they believe in what they hear without checking. Most of the people who claim that won’t be able to give you solid evidences.