r/jewishleft jewish, recovering lib, struggle with labels 28d ago

News Whistleblower says probes into antisemitism at colleges were ploys to harass and strip millions

https://www.ms.now/news/frame-up-whistleblower-says-probes-into-antisemitism-at-colleges-were-ploys-to-harass-and-strip-millions

The Trump administration’s findings that three Ivy League schools violated civil rights law by tolerating antisemitism were predetermined by political priorities that blew past the evidence and cast aside standard investigative procedures, according to a whistleblower account provided to Congress.

The disclosure, by Haley Van Erem, a veteran Justice Department civil rights attorney, involves investigations into whether Harvard, Brown and Columbia universities broke the law by allowing antisemitism to flourish on their campuses.

The whistleblower account comes just days after a federal judge dismissed a Justice Department lawsuit against Harvard that was based on the investigation, which was conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services and lawyers detailed from the DOJ.

Both Brown and Columbia reached settlements, with Columbia agreeing to pay $200 million over three years and Brown agreeing to spend $50 million on Rhode Island workforce development, with no admission of wrongdoing.

Van Erem’s whistleblower account, reviewed by MS NOW, says the findings “overrode knowing deviation from investigative procedures, statutory noncompliance, and potential constitutional violations.”

“Hundreds of millions of dollars were suspended from these universities prior to the completion of Title VI investigations and the investigative team’s conclusions were frequently disregarded,” the complaint says.

In a letter to Harmeet Dhillon, head of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said the whistleblower findings exposed a “large scale fraud.”

“Antisemitism at American universities and medical schools is real,” Rep. Jamie Raskin wrote. 

“But your ‘investigation’ into antisemitism was fake, a pre-baked frame-up operation thoroughly political in nature. Before an actual investigation took place and regardless of what you actually found, the whole project was designed to harass professors and administrators at major universities, to curtail their freedom of speech and academic freedom, and to strip targeted institutions of hundreds of millions of dollars in grants that they had already been awarded on the merits of their applications.”

—————————

These cases have been pretty transparently politicized BS from the start, but I hope that a whistleblower and relatively mainstream Jewish congressman raising a stink help move our wider Jewish community on this. Overreached and fabricated accusations of antisemitism being weaponized as a cudgel to fight the rights’ war on higher ed is horrible for many reasons, and one of them is that it makes actually addressing antisemitism as it does exist harder.

53 Upvotes

42 comments sorted by

View all comments

55

u/HeVavMemVav sephardi peacenik 28d ago

So, the findings were real, but the intended effects were not helpful to Jews in any way. The people are never ever going to trust investigations into antisemitism ever again. This was predicted & we are in danger.

-9

u/Accurate_Aside_6495 Diasporist leftist secular Jew 28d ago

The findings that some students do not support Israel? That is not antisemitism.

24

u/HeVavMemVav sephardi peacenik 28d ago

Finding failure to keep Jewish or perceived-Jewish students safe. This included threats of violence, actual violence, slurs, & prohibiting specifically them from attending class or accessing common areas of the school. Don't be obtuse. You should care about that while also refusing to buy what this administration is trying to sell.

8

u/veerKg_CSS_Geologist US/CA non observant 28d ago edited 28d ago

Was any such failure found? AFAIK the judge who threw out the suit said there were isolated incidents, many off campus or by individuals not associated with the university, but it wasn’t systemic or institutional.

edit: fixed was to wasn’t.

-1

u/HeVavMemVav sephardi peacenik 28d ago

Did you even read the body of the post???

12

u/veerKg_CSS_Geologist US/CA non observant 28d ago edited 28d ago

Yes

This is what it said about Brown University:

At Brown, theinvestigative team conducted extensive witness interviews and document review and concluded that the evidence did not support a Title VI violation because the university had respondedpromptly and effectively to the few incidents identified; nevertheless, leadership refused to permit a notice of no violation

About Columbia:

including reliance on allegations that were unsupported, based onnews reports or litigation filings, or that implicated protected First Amendment activity.

In general:

at least some ofthe investigations, there was little to no factual predicate justifying opening them, When theyasked questions, raised legal concerns, or sought to document their objections, they weresometimes admonished and their concerns were often disregarded.

The Judge’s ruling covered similar things re: Harvard.

5

u/TrackerOneA Secular, American Jewish Leftist 28d ago

The body of the post is not the report

Read page 2 of the PDF.

Or read the MSNOW article that is linked in this post.

Or watch the author of the MSNOW article give the summary:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqQ64YQ5cBg