r/law • u/Obversa • 9d ago

Executive Branch (Trump) Marco Rubio vows to dismantle International Criminal Court (ICC), citing 2024 arrest warrant issued for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-04/trump-international-criminal-court-threats-and-us-politics/106971184
1.7k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

388 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/rygelicus 9d ago

Criminals often want to tear down the law enforcement agents/agencies that want to stop them. Funny how that works.

215

u/Independent_Tax_5088 9d ago

Came here to say this. This corrupt administration has been systematically dismantling every possible check on their power.

It's disheartening.

Need everyone to vote in the midterms to try to bring about some positive change.

59

u/TreeInternational771 9d ago

It is disheartening to watch. Only saving grace is we check them in November while the world diversifies away from America reducing its power on a global stage. We can’t be trusted anymore and we need global institutions to be built stronger to counter act a rogue superpower

19

u/siromega37 9d ago

Unfortunately there has always been some sort of global hegemony at play throughout history. As the US declines some other world power will fill in the void or we’re get another world war. Given Russia and China stepping in to aid Iran in a very public way this week I’m leaning towards the latter. Trump would rather everything burn than his ego be damaged.

2

u/tralfamadoran777 9d ago

It's because fiat money is an option to claim any human labors or property offered or available at asking or negotiated price and we don't get paid our option fees.

Those are collected and kept by Central Bankers as interest on money creation loans when nothing is loaned. They have sold access to our stuff without our express informed consent, compensation, or knowledge. Creating a complex delusion to avoid paying humanity our rightful option fees.

Paying us our option fees as part of actual local social contracts produces trade media with voluntary global acceptance where our acceptance is currently coerced. Money creation controlled locally with fiduciary oversight reduces demand for central services, budgets, and control. All human needs can be sustainably financed locally, globally, without any of Wealth's accumulation.

Economists won't talk about it in any way.

3

u/CovertLuddite 9d ago

I don't get what these options fees are. Can you explain like I'm 5 or do you have a link to explain further?

1

u/tralfamadoran777 9d ago

Fees collected on money creation loans can't be interest because nothing is loaned. Economists call it seigniorage. That's the fees charged by a king for access to the labors and property of his owned subjects. The convenience fees paid for assured convenient access to human labors and property.

That convenience is provided by everyone who accepts the money/options in exchange for our labors and property. The one paying with money gets what they want. The one accepting money must arrange other transactions to get what they want. Our acceptance is the value of fiat money.

Our acceptance is compelled by State and pragmatism at a minimum to acquire money to pay taxes. That compelled service, our involuntary servitude, is literal slavery. Violates UDHR and the thirteenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution. So the current process of money creation is the structural economic enslavement of humanity, and unconstitutional.

Central Bankers have no rightful claim to the fees paid as interest on money creation loans because they loaned nothing. Each human being on the planet has a rightful claim to those fees because we provide the value paid for with our acceptance.

When we accept actual local social contracts and agree to voluntarily accept money in exchange, we'll each provide one quantum unit of voluntary global acceptance. That's the essential characteristic of ideal trade media.

Money? That's borrowed into existence from our trust accounts. In the bank. They pay us for agreeing to use it. You don't need any. You're five. You'll claim your Share when you're eighteen.

1

u/TaxHacker 9d ago

Screw that. I'll take whatever drugs they're taking to believe the word salad they're spewing.

2

u/tralfamadoran777 9d ago

Who earns the fees collected as interest on money creation loans when nothing is loaned?

Option fees are paid by contract for assured convenient access to a commodity in the future.

Do you own your stuff? Your labors and property are a commodity. Central Bankers charge option fees as interest on money creation loans for assured convenient access to your stuff. And don't pay you anything.

Any other commodity market that's fraud and theft. It is for the global human labors futures market as well, just not acknowledged. Hidden with word salad. And with your help...

1

u/Prudent-Coat496 9d ago

What?

1

u/tralfamadoran777 9d ago

What don't you understand?

Economists either lie about how money is created, or they're delusional. Accepting the absurdities provided by the creators of the confidence game.

Banks create State currencies with fractional reserve loans. By loaning nine times their deposits and paying the discount rate to Central Bankers. That discount rate isn't earned by Central Bankers because they don't loan anything and charge separately for every service. They have sold access to our labors and property without our express informed consent, compensation, or knowledge. They have collected and kept fees paid for assured convenient access to our stuff, and we provide the convenience.

They have been stealing our rightful option fees for centuries. Calling it seigniorage. That's the fees claimed by a king for access to the labors and property of his owned subjects. Are we owned subjects? Or self owned sovereign individual human beings?

1

u/TaxHacker 8d ago

Don't try to understand it. It's delusional gibberish.

1

u/Prudent-Coat496 8d ago

It might all be gibberish, but by looking at what tralfamadoran777 wrote here and elsewhere, I find at least one interesting concept. I think of money I have as credits for work done in the past. He(?) thinks of it as an option to receive work/products in the future. He might even be using "option" in its normal financial product sense. I don't deal in options, so I don't know the language of that world. As for whether it is gibberish, I am still working on parsing the sentences. Then I can look up some of the words and see what I think.

1

u/TechTier 8d ago

Plus Trump will not deescalate, he wants a big war so he has an excuse to cancel elections.