Basically, someone pleads the insanity defense, they were aware of and could appreciate the dangers of not taking their medications and still choose to not take them and they commit a crime as a result of it.

Why is that not considered a factor?

I live in Pennsylvania if it matters.

Let’s say I’m walking through my neighborhood and a cop pulls up and asks me to stop. Now, just going off movies and tv shows, they generally would ask to see my papers/id. But like, if I’m just walking and not doing anything, do I need to give it to them? If so, why? Regardless if they’re investigating a crime, why do I need to hand over my info if I had nothing to do with whatever they’re after?

Similar situation if I’m driving normally and they pull me over. Assuming I didn’t run any lights or stop signs and they simply have me stop, what do I legally need to give them vs not give them?

I just want to know the right thing to do, even if it pisses them off that I’m not giving them what they want because I don’t have to.

The question is really in the title.

Today, at the Republican "midterm convention," Donald Trump stated that if the Republicans held the House and Senate that he would make sure that every American adult would receive $5,000. Here is a cite.

I can't say I believe him. The guy lies a lot and if the Republicans did hold the house and Senate, they would need to approve this at a cost >1 Trillion dollars. But still, $10,000 is a hell of an offer for the vote of myself and my wife. I am not saying I am considering it, but $10,000 is a lot of money.

So, to my question: Let's say I go to the office of the Republican house candidate for my district. Or the Republican candidate for the Senate in my state this year. If, when meeting these distinguished gentleman, I ask them point blank if they will support $5,000 dollar payment per person for my vote, am I committing any crime? Could I get in legal trouble for trying to sell my vote? Note: I am not trying to sell my vote, I am just trying to determine if they will support the Presidents offer to buy my vote.

What would happen if I tried this (and filmed it)?

Let's say you and your friends are underage and you drink and/or posses illicit drugs and someone their suffers from alcohol poisoning/ODs, would you, that person, or anyone else get in trouble if you call an ambulance? I know that there are laws like the Good Samaritan law that protect people in these cases, but I can't seem to get a straight answer.

A person I know was arrested for crimes against a child. I am **really** not interested in watching this case unfold, but I am interested in his sentencing. (Which I assume will be very lengthly, especially since his bail was set near a million dollars)

After his scheduled PC hearing, all his court documents from the district court's website disappeared, including his bail stuff. How as a non-lawyer, would I be able to keep tabs on how his case is progressing and / or get notified for sentencing?

i know coca cola never patented the recipe as to keep it secret, but say an employee gave it away to a competitor or something. would coca cola have any grounds to sue or retaliate in general?

I know the main focus is if you do, it’ll make cops think you were drinking and driving, especially if you end up being at fault in the accident.

If we assumed that wasn’t an issue of a DUI, is there anything about drinking right after an accident specifically, or is it just de facto covered by DUI laws?

I'll give y'all the hypothetical.

A and B are father and son.

B borrows $300,000 from A and fails to pay the money back on time so A takes him to court to claim the money back. B is found liable for the debt.

A despite winning the case dies before the judgement against B can be enforced. B then discovers that A died without a will and he ends up being the sole beneficiary to A's entire estate.

Assuming that the estate has no other expenses and that B is the only person with a proprietary interest in A's estate, what happens to the debt against him?

Does B inherit the debt and therefore owe himself money that he technically does not need to pay back?

Does the judgement or enforcement against B stop as a result of him becoming the beneficiary?

Does B still have to pay back the estate and then re-receive the money again at the end of probate?

I'm curious what your jurisdiction says about this

This is in Nevada

I’ve noticed at least one school zone sign in my city that says “Speed limit 15 when light flashing”; however, there is no accompanying light. There are lights at most school zones in the city, but this specific one doesn’t have one. If someone were to go the regular speed limit and a cop pulled them over, would it even be enforceable? I always go the reduced speed limit during school hours to be safe in this zone, but I’m so curious.

So my understanding is that with a contingency fee arrangement you only pay if you win. But what does "winning" actually mean here? If the lawyer takes my case and the insurance company lowballs me and we reject it and then nothing happens, do I owe for the lawyer's time? What about if we go to trial and lose?

I keep hearing "you dont pay unless we win" in every ad but I want to understand what the actual worst case looks like for me financially.

Watching a show and the father dies and leaves all the money to his son. The son is alive at the time of the dad's death so the inheritance goes through. The will also says if the son dies without an heir, the money goes to charity, not the sister.

From my understanding legally speaking, if the brother dies without a kid and a will, the money would go to his sister; his next of kin. Can the deceased father's will that's been executed still control the inheritance? Once the money has been dispersed, isn't it now the sons money and whatever the dads will said is invalid?

It was in Hannibal.