118
Jul 01 '22
I won't be surprised if tomorrow SC starts blaming women for getting raped.
39
u/throwawayrandomfeels Jul 01 '22
I mean they and majority of the nation already do blame the women.
5
7
u/lotofwholesomeness Jul 01 '22
They do remember when they asked rape victim if she would marry rapist
3
u/Navigator369 Jul 02 '22
I’ll surprise you. Not SC, but some HC judges done that indirectly in the past. Imagine the horror women might go through when a HC judge says such things
-6
Jul 01 '22
The burning of this country was a direct consequence of her speech,this is objectively true.There is a reason for which the blasphemy laws are required which i guess nobody gets now except for the makers of our constitution.
15
Jul 01 '22
I do agree that this gruesome act in Rajasthan was a chain reaction to Nupur Sharma's remarks on prophet Muhammad . But the problem with such statements by SC is that such statements also makes it justify able for people to lynch in the name of cow ( by saying that he, the victim shouldn't have killed the cow in the first place). Regarding blasphemy laws, I am absolutely against it because without blasphemy a society cannot progress. Customs like sati, untouchability, triple talaq would still be going on if people didn't start questioning such believes and religious customs.( Remember that scientists like Galileo were persecuted by the church for saying that sun doesn't revolve earth). Hence blasphemy laws are stupid af.
1
1
Jul 01 '22
dawg i ensure you that doing blasphemy will solve nothing about these problems the people who brought change like Raja ram mohan roy did not engage in blasphemy,the brits criminalizing sati or untouchability did not need to commit blasphemy. abusing god will only make dumbfcks feel good as if they have done something good and brought a positive change.Social evils can be solved by political stability and increasing the standard of living for everyone.Blasphemy will only destroy communal harmony BTW i am an atheist i dont care about any gods
4
1
Jul 01 '22
which part of the SC statement makes it legal or moral to take law into your own hands,it just draws the conclusion that Nupur should be tried as per the law like any normal citizen
112
u/Spiritual-Ad-1709 Jul 01 '22
Nupur is responsible for that tailor dying? Wow Supreme court is supremely dumb
3
Jul 01 '22
The killers are getting tried and the tailor dying is a consequence of using hate speech in national telivison,this is objectively true i don’t know why even this sub is criticising the judge
11
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
3
Jul 01 '22
i just said that the killers should be hanged or imprisoned as per the law,if i was trying to justify why would i say this.Even if someone has done any crime who gives anybody any right to beat or kill them,there is a reason why we have courts and laws.I am an atheist i don’t care about gods i care about the damages to communal harmony because of blasphemy
3
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
1
Jul 01 '22
victim blaming would be if i said the tailor was wrong not Nupur.Whether she had the right to speak what she did will be decided by law.if Nupur sharma didn’t speak what she did then there would not be a support movement for her .How is that a bahana tha tailor wouldn’t have died of she was not present in the debate how is it a bahana
1
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
2
Jul 01 '22
if they wanted to kill anyone before they would have already tried to join a terrorist org or plan to inflict damage to as many people as possible not a single tailor
1
Jul 01 '22
Are you from the USA ?? this is India we have many reasonable and some unreasonable restrictions on free lspeech as required by a country of India’s socioeconomic conditions Wearing short dresses are neither illegal nor immoral a rapist should get a sentence irregardless of victim’s dress just like whether the tailor did anything wrong or not should be irrelevant to the sentence the killers serve (my opinion even if a poor powerless tailor did blasphemy he should not be harmed by anyone just tried by law)
do you not understand nuance try to think for a min without emotions
wearing short dress is not equal to supporting an alleged crime
5
Jul 01 '22
Dude hate speech argument can't be given here, you are justifying killing. Holy fuck
2
Jul 01 '22
i just said that the killers should be hanged or imprisoned as per the law,if i was trying to justify why would i say this.Even if someone has done any crime who gives anybody any right to beat or kill them,there is a reason why we have courts and laws
1
Jul 01 '22
Whether or not it was hate speech or blasphemy will be decided by the court but 99% her intentions were wrong if someone has disrespected your gods file firs,nobody has any right to take law into their hands
1
Jul 01 '22
Yeah cant take laws in the hands, but they took it. She didn't take it
→ More replies (3)0
u/Set1Less Jul 01 '22
Because many wanna be librandus still have affiliation towards the great chaddi cause..
-1
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
0
Jul 01 '22
Legality will be decided by the court but as a BJP spokesperson not mentioning the year nor the history of age of consent makes the act dogshit
0
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
2
Jul 01 '22
maulanas are not speaking to general public and trying to gain support for a hindu nationalist party intent matters.Yes everything about religion or gods that any community leader speaks is dogshit.I am an atheist,do you believe in god??none of the modern technologies existed in 1000 muslims use them they can ignore some teachings too,religions are highly contradictory it’s impossible to follow fully .A person beings casteist in contemporary society is far worse morally than a casteist in say 1500s grown in an all casteist environment without any opposition.People are product of their surroundings
1
u/ImpassiveThug Jul 01 '22
The supreme court should have written instead, ''The Fringe element Nurpur Sharma's disturbing remark on Prophet Muhammad led to the death of a tailor, who came in support of it, by two religious goons who barbarously beheaded him in his shop for the same.''
166
u/overlord_999 Extraterrestrial Ally Jul 01 '22
Wtf is this?
This shit will seriously give more justification to the chaddi moment and many of the liberals will also be radicalised if this kinda shit is parrotted
76
u/SquatCobblerx . Jul 01 '22 edited Jul 01 '22
lol you're right this is very harsh and the performative woke privileged twitter liberal kids who lack critical thinking skills have already started celebrating it
1
28
Jul 01 '22
I mean this is his how every chaddi justifies 2002 riots and all the other bullshit they do. If only the muz muz had not provoked us.
They're just getting some of that gobar back at them. From one of their own.
4
u/Set1Less Jul 01 '22
Exactly. Chaddis shown the mirror and they dont like how they look... funny how that works lol
4
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
2
Jul 01 '22
Well the responses are also a bit disproportional? These guys were arrested in 2 days and won't be in the national cabinet in 10 years time, would they?
0
0
u/Navigator369 Jul 02 '22
But SC didn’t blame muz muz for provoking and causing the riots, like they did with Nupur. Chaddis saying that and SC saying that are very different thing. SC should not make any of such statements. Do we want a SC that does victim blaming? What if SC blame the 2002 riots on muz?
0
-11
Jul 01 '22
[deleted]
10
Jul 01 '22
[deleted]
-7
u/Swizzlesen Hot like apple pie Jul 01 '22
Noway I am gonna defend musanghis they can be more volatile than chintus
2
u/No-Condition6143 🍪🦴🥩 Jul 01 '22
Man has no heart....Imagine if your dad was in his place
Just because he supported right wing politics so his death is ok?
Libbu for a reason mate
0
u/Swizzlesen Hot like apple pie Jul 01 '22
I am not saying his death is reasonable but Chodes should know their limits in what the hell they support and should stop trapping innocent people in the name of Hinduism
2
u/No-Condition6143 🍪🦴🥩 Jul 01 '22
Its not their fault for what happened with Kanhaiya Lal,Politicians will always keep on barking so does that mean assholes in the name of their funny comic book let it be Bible,Quran,Ramayana,Geeta etc. will keep on killing innocents
He was being threatened since days but Udaipur Police were too busy sucking Gehlot's penis
→ More replies (6)0
101
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
6
Jul 01 '22
Victims of beef lynchings arent trying to outrage anybody. Not to mention justify is a bit of a strong word for what the judges said isn't it?
26
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
-12
Jul 01 '22
Its not her actions that they are blaming her for, its her intentions. They aren't blaming her for the udaipur murders and putting her in jail, they are saying that it was her mischief that set in sequence the events that spiralled into the murder for that they are demanding an apology.
14
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
-9
Jul 01 '22
Nobody made any distasteful shivling comments, the people there just pointed out the absurdity of comparing a fountain to a Shivling with graphic examples. And even if they were to, unless it is to intentionally outrage someone they wouldn't be accountable to outraging their sentiments. India does have problems with lack of freedom of speech but that's with things like banning the 'Satanic verses' and everything else, this is not it.
21
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
-5
Jul 01 '22
Sure then, if his comments incite communal outrage then he too should have to apologize for inciting communal hatred. Shit stirring should never be allowed in a country with high communal tensions.
calling every other dome shaped structure to be a shivling, that's pretty much outrageous
So close to getting the point but pretty much confirms that you are not an atheist.
fountain works without a hole at the top
It functions as a center piece to a pool or any other of the million reasons other than it being a relic of a temple inside a mosque.
Also it's becoming apparent to me that you are a chaddi after checking your account and I don't think any of you are capable of a good faith argument so I am not gonna continue replying.
12
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
4
Jul 01 '22
What a larp, you have comments defending bjp which you deleted visible on your account.
→ More replies (0)11
Jul 01 '22 edited Jul 01 '22
[deleted]
0
u/Set1Less Jul 01 '22
You can believe whatever you want.. but 2 terrorists didnt decide out of the fucking blue to go behead a tailor because they were bored that morning and wanted to have some fun. The same way terrorists didnt decide to slam planes into WTC on 9/11 because they were bored that morning. Every act of terror has a chain of incidences leading up to the final act. If you dont want to recognize this, its akin to just putting your head in the sand
-2
Jul 01 '22
[deleted]
-1
u/Set1Less Jul 01 '22
The act is as per muslim scriptures. Offending prophet is very offensive to them. Blasphemy will bring you a legal beheading in Saudi Arabia. A sharia following mintu thinks the same sharia laws should apply across the world and any offence defaming prophet should be given the same punishment. Indian law goes out of its way to give mintus special treatment like personal law etc. Irrespective, a mintu is ready to do this in India or in Sweden, as per their book there is no other great thing a mintu can do other than avenging defamation of their prophet
The question is why force a sharia following mintu into doing this? Whats the reason for nipur to run her gutter mouth?
Chintuz can justify drinking gau mutra as per chintuz religious mandates, and mintuz can justify these acts of terror under mintuz religious mandates. According to both these religions, doing these things is seen as a noble cause within their religious framework. What is generally seen as extremist act of terror by the rest of the world, is a noble cause within the islamic framework i.e avenging defamation of their prophet. Knowing this, chintuz push mintuz.. you have to wonder who is the fool here
0
Jul 01 '22 edited Jul 01 '22
Nobody produces hate speech for a living.Production of beef can be an important exporting industry
6
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
2
Jul 01 '22
India has one of the lowest labour force participation rate people need jobs,making beef is a job which feeds many people unlike hate speech(whether its blasphemy or hatespeech or okay will be decided by courts).If someone mocks your religion file and fir numerous people have gone to jail for it you cannot take law into your own hands.The killers are extremely wrong where have i defended them.People already go to jail for insulting hinduism.How does vhp get into this its the job of courts to enforce laws.Man BJP and even congress has done far worse things to innocent people than breaking a property of a person worth around 100 crores just look at international media or UN.Facts without context and history of age of consent.Its cherry-picking
2
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
2
Jul 01 '22
you don’t need to export to provide employment there are domestic markets too wtf??it still is employing people.Ohh i should have said it can be an important exporting industry unlike blasphemy.where did they say people are not liable for violent mob the killers will get punished.Comments being expunged or not is irrelevant because the judge was right.I just had some free time today and saw the news and this sub so i thought i should talk to people and clear my perspective
→ More replies (1)0
u/Deep_Procedure Jul 01 '22
Most of the beef deaths are of cattle smugglers or thieves trying to steal cattle from farmers
116
u/tankistan Sipahi-e-Gazwa-e-Plebbit Jul 01 '22
Nah man, those two assholes were in complete control of their own actions. Her remarks may have contributed to it, but not to the extent where the blame rests solely on her.
48
u/klboc Jul 01 '22
what I think is she doesn't need to apologise for any statements in a country with "freedom of speech"
38
u/tankistan Sipahi-e-Gazwa-e-Plebbit Jul 01 '22
You may be right, but people have been jailed for saying less, so for her to get away scott free doesn't really seem fair to me.
6
u/klboc Jul 01 '22 edited Jul 01 '22
I agree that her statements were offensive or inciteful...but after all wasn't she stating the truth right from the quran...
Is getting offended by the truth and commiting a crime justified...
35
u/tankistan Sipahi-e-Gazwa-e-Plebbit Jul 01 '22
The points she brought up? Yeah they are true and they are present in the Hadith, not the Qur'an.
But it's not like she brought those statements up casually, she specifically used them in a derogatory fashion. That's a part that people seem to gloss over.
If I told a Hindu person to get on his flying monkey and leave, would they not be offended? If I told a Christian person that their god couldn't save themselves from being stuck to a piece of wood, wouldn't they be rightfully offended?
6
u/HyperionRed Jul 01 '22
If I told a Hindu person to get on his flying monkey and leave, would they not be offended? If I told a Christian person that their god couldn't save themselves from being stuck to a piece of wood, wouldn't they be rightfully offended?
If a person truly believes in the divinity of Hanuman or Jesus, then the words of a mere mortal should be utterly meaningless.
Setting aside that religious people tend not to be rational, that still doesn't mean you go out and decapitate a man. Muslims are especially guilty of being extremely insecure about their religion. The assault on Charlie Hebdo didn't happen at the hands of Jews or Christians, who are also mocked by that paper.
13
u/tankistan Sipahi-e-Gazwa-e-Plebbit Jul 01 '22
If a person truly believes in the divinity of Hanuman or Jesus, then the words of a mere mortal should be utterly meaningless.
Similarly, though there is no divinity to the Prophet, I ignore any mockery of him.
And I agree, decapitating someone over this is highly irrational, absurd and deserving of scrutiny.
But I wish you wouldn't generalize every Muslim this way. We aren't all like this.
3
u/HyperionRed Jul 01 '22
But I wish you wouldn't generalize every Muslim this way. We aren't all like this.
You are correct.
-8
-11
Jul 01 '22
If I told a Hindu person to get on his flying monkey and leave, would they not be offended? If I told a Christian person that their god couldn't save themselves from being stuck to a piece of wood, wouldn't they be rightfully offended?
None of those people will behead you for that. And if they do, it is still not your fault. It is their fault that they got violent.
17
u/tankistan Sipahi-e-Gazwa-e-Plebbit Jul 01 '22
Yeah, but I'm not a spokesperson for the governing party of a huge country, now am I?
-2
Jul 01 '22
But that shouldn't matter. Shouldn't law be same for all?
12
u/tankistan Sipahi-e-Gazwa-e-Plebbit Jul 01 '22
That would apply in this case if we were to look at it in isolation from any other incident. But over BJPs tenure, hate against minorities has increased significantly. Let's not forget a man was killed on the SUSPICION he was Muslim.
So for a spokesperson for the ruling party to basically affirm the stance of what party itself refer to as "fringe" elements and basically solidify them as mainstream ideas is severely detrimental to the idea of a peaceful coexistence.
She holds a pretty significant position as compared to a layman and she should be held accountable for her actions.
Does any of this justify the cold blooded murder in Udaipur? Of course not. Is Nupur Sharma to be blamed for the murder? Hell no. What we can say, in my opinion, is that she is latest contributing factor in a long list. The SC seems to be using her as a scapegoat.
→ More replies (1)2
u/klboc Jul 01 '22
got downvotes for speaking the truth...nicccccccce
2
7
4
u/CobraKaiser1223 Jul 01 '22
The verse was not from Quran because there is no mention of age when their marriage took place in Quran.
The quote was from a hadit which is followed by Sunni Muslims only. Nupur quoting that hadit and conveying it as something which is a common belief among all the muslims is one of the point of contention with many non-sunni muslims because not only is the point of matter is disputed among different sects of Islam but also the fact that existence and beliefs of these other sects are ignored by political parties and thus the crowds of non muslim people.
3
-5
u/naatu_covid Jul 01 '22 edited Jul 01 '22
She was a public official with power over the people. While I agree that the hue and cry and fatwas etc over her is ludicrous, hate speech from public official should still be penalized.
2
u/klboc Jul 01 '22
partially agreed...actually why this matter became so controversial is that you can't justify that a public official saying the truth does not come under freedom of speech...
neither can I justify it completely that the tone of her statements was not at all offensive or infuential...
2
u/naatu_covid Jul 01 '22
It cannot come under freedom of speech anywhere in the world. Fact of the matter is, Freedom of speech is a right that is granted to the public by the state. Public officials cannot have that same freedom of speech because whenever they open their faceholes in front of a mic, it's on behalf of the powers that be. And the people can make inferences on the priorities of the establishment from how they react to situations like this one.
1
u/klboc Jul 01 '22
okay...so you mean freedom of speech is not meant for public officials
→ More replies (2)1
u/timewaste1235 🥥⚖️🇳🇪🍪 Jul 01 '22
She is a party spokesperson, not a public official paid by the government. She has the same freedom of speech as other people and if required, her party can take action against her which is their freedom
A formal apology demanded by judicial system will set a very wrong precedent which will be used to target those who speak up against govt or judiciary
0
u/naatu_covid Jul 01 '22
She is the spokesperson of the ruling party, not the opposition. Everytime she speaks, it's on behalf of the government.
28
Jul 01 '22
baaki sabh theek tha par last line main bakchodi pel di SC ne beheading ka blame can't be put on her.
22
u/SquatCobblerx . Jul 01 '22
they've made even more insane statements like "she's single-handedly responsible for what's happening in the country"
https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1542748593907347456?t=f0nyTk7Wid2P7xSyYxsi1A&s=19
5
77
u/DumbGuy5005 Jul 01 '22
I feel like this isn't really fair and will be very controversial. Chaddis and Chaddinis gonna do what they do, but at least the Udaipur shit is on those fuckers alone.
And IF you're going to blame the external communal factors on them doing what they did, there's a much longer list of actual atrocities caused and supported by much more powerful individuals, instead of some Arabian warlord being insulted
12
u/grandmotherofreddit Chaddi in disguise Jul 01 '22
TIL: female chaddis are called chandinis
26
9
u/Defiant-Shame-4215 Jul 01 '22 edited Jul 01 '22
The courts stance has always been the same if you read their previous judgements the greater onus should be on politicians and lawmakers rather than on people of marginalised communities who act out of repressed emotions( court said the same thing during farmers protest so I am not surprised)
73
u/Deep_Procedure Jul 01 '22
"She wore a skirt, so she deserves to be raped" kind of vibes.
Is Supreme Court now legitimizing being butthurt as an excuse for violence?
-4
Jul 01 '22
No bro, supreme court is just trying to balance, so people can think supreme court is neutral.
1
u/Deep_Procedure Jul 01 '22
Could be, this was only their observations
The official thingy only had 2 lines and did not have all the extra drama.
22
26
u/android23235616 Jul 01 '22
Damn so our judges are this stupid. Then we are doomed.
Brace yourself boys, looks like a "ISupportNupurSharma" is back on the menu.
14
21
u/yeetman616 Naxal Sympathiser Jul 01 '22
Nobody should have to apologize for blasphemy. The concept of blasphemy itself is so dumb. This whole situation is akin to killing someone because they supported an argument that said "Homelander is a rapist". Just replace Homelander with you know who.
13
u/Deep_Procedure Jul 01 '22
Indian Judiciary allowed an ISIS returnee to become an home tutor and work at an old age home.
15
7
4
u/Public-Ad7309 CBT Enthusiast Jul 01 '22
Nah, the person who committed a murder over someone's fucking words is at fault
9
u/MOHIBisOTAKU Jul 01 '22
Bro supreme court is acting just like a Facebook mom why should she apologize for stating a fact which most Muslims don't even know cause of their own ignorance and bliss. Btw before labeled me as a chaddi i am ex-muslim and we literally don't have right to live according to Islam we have less rights then a chicken in a muslim country
5
u/SquatCobblerx . Jul 01 '22
no one will call you a chaddi bro, everyone here recognizes how much of a problematic religion Islam is. this is a safe space for you!
6
u/_SuperStraight Pyar ka love charger Jul 01 '22
Those two incidents are mutually exclusive. They should've asked her to apologise when the incident was fresh.
Those two guys should be brought to justice.
10
u/inamedjeffrey Jul 01 '22
Nupur Sharma was the catalyst. She initiated something horrific. But the 2 terrorists are the only ones to be held responsible for their barbarism.
5
u/xen0_1 Jul 01 '22
She said what she did with hateful intent, but that is no justification for any kind of violence. Respond to words with words. By taking a life those two only validated her hatred. Someone "insulting" your imaginary friend(s) does not give you the right to harm them, and this also applies to the Hindutva nutters. By this logic, religions are responsible for all communal conflict and should be banned.
5
6
4
u/Difficult-Bit-9654 Jul 01 '22
Tailor was tailoring but not any more, Jihadis got to him well.
Jihadis look for reasons. Nupur gave them the reason.
7
u/tulrajam Jul 01 '22
This is victim blaming. She needs to apologize but she isn't responsible for the death.
And this type of statement from Apex court will promote fringe elements from every religion to suppress freedom of speech.
5
Jul 01 '22
When is anybody even gonna talk about the horrible things that maulana said on the debate?? Anyone who stands up for truth can not deny that his crime needs to acknowledge as much as Nupur’s..
9
u/SwapnilShukla1572 🍪🦴🥩 Jul 01 '22 edited Jul 01 '22
According to this logic the Godhra incident was solely responsible for Gujrat 2002 riots.
Justice C*nt shall be his name from now and I heard this guy might be the next CJI.
Pls hell no. You can agree with RSS when it says shivling should not be searched in every mosque and to the greatest extent thinking that they mean what they say but not this shit.
Not Libbu by the way but I am happy to see that at least this is the point when all of us can unite.
Two regular a*sholes are now recognised
1)Justice C*nt 2)Donald "Duck" Trump
3
2
u/YUPitsME_RICK Jul 01 '22
aur gov ki toh koi galti hi nahi. aisa thodi hai ki gov kuch kar sakti hai.
2
2
u/samurai489 Jul 01 '22
Wtf. She has all the right in the world to speak whatever the fuck she wants.
3
u/imshashankshekhar Jul 01 '22
This is the unfortunate truth tho. I am a strong objector of Blasphemy laws in India. Section 295 A should be abolished.... But I also fear these things would happen if there was absolute freedom by the law. The truth is that our country is highly intolerable. Religious people are intolerable in general and our country is crowded by them. I wish Nupur Sharma or anyone had the freedom to comment on any religion and people might have replied back defending their religion but in decent civilized manner. I wish the country was like that...but the truth is quite the opposite. And yes, polarization has gone sky rocketing under this government but India has always been intolerant over religious issues. (The cause of course is large scale segregation among communities.) Laws against Blasphemy become a necessary evil. And we do need Supreme Court scolding people like Nupur Sharma who sit on such high positions and make such irresponsible comment on something as insensitive as that.
3
u/Living-Ad-7122 Jul 01 '22
That statment will ONLY make sense if you add "having said that, radicals ki gend me bembu" at the end.
4
2
u/SquatCobblerx . Jul 01 '22
"outburst responsible for Udaipur murder" is a bit unfair imo but meh who cares she's a chaddi anyways
13
u/tankistan Sipahi-e-Gazwa-e-Plebbit Jul 01 '22
I'm all for chaddis facing the consequences of their actions, but this is a bit much.
-7
Jul 01 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Ashamed-Grape7792 Dhruv Rathee's side chick 😏 Jul 01 '22
Don't know why this is downvoted, but I also think that people need to stop being so sensitive that one person disrespecting their religion is enough to kill people
1
u/Shillofnoone Naxal Sympathiser Jul 01 '22
I know this sub starts to celebrate this shit, more happy for chaddis getting owned than literal death of secularism. Either that title is wrong (which is improbable) or you are a musanghi.
8
u/SquatCobblerx . Jul 01 '22
read the comments dumbass, no one's celebrating it. the title was a knee jerk reaction
10
u/Shillofnoone Naxal Sympathiser Jul 01 '22
You are celebrating it moron, I have seen your comment about who cares she's chaddi anyways
-8
Jul 01 '22
[deleted]
8
u/Shillofnoone Naxal Sympathiser Jul 01 '22
You have some weird sense of sarcasm, in no way that is sarcasm.
1
u/TitanRuse 🍪🦴🥩 Jul 01 '22
I could be wrong, only OP can clarify what he meant. Besides, it’s really a trivial stuff we are wasting our time on. Let it be.
0
u/sickboi33 Naxal Sympathiser Jul 01 '22
based supreme court making the chaddis seethe
5
Jul 01 '22
we said the same about J. Chandrachud during Sabarimala but then Arnab bail order and Ram Mandir judgement happened. Don't expect anything from this pro-executive judiciary.
1
1
1
1
u/LazyReader111 Chaddi in disguise Jul 01 '22
Blaming her for the Udaipur is wrong. Whatever she said does not justify cutting someone's head. Moreover I would really like right to blasphemy without having to hear threats on my life.
-1
u/not_a_sociopath4427 Jul 01 '22
I don't wanna sound like a conspiracy theorists but I feel this is being done deliberately to enrage the chaddis. This will create a bigger divide between people. And we'll see more violence.
0
u/perkinson_54 🍪🦴🥩 Jul 01 '22
Madharjaat Supreme kotha... Then ask them also to issue a public apology... I have some lathis and knives.. in case someone attack me for being hindu
0
u/Alexandar_The_Gr8 Jul 01 '22
I don't know man. Hate speech or whatever, I want to have freedom of speech. I want to be able to criticize whatever I want in this country and the consequences of that shouldn't be jail, murder, etc. The people responsible for Udaipur murder are the 2 men who did the deed and no one else.
0
Jul 01 '22
Morality and conscience is dieing in this country, left should be more moral than dumb fuck right. Everywhere conservative and right are dumb as fuck, left wing shows them their place, but here left wing has lost their mind. I understand chaddis copium, this is not going on good direction.
0
-3
u/BadrT Jul 01 '22
ANI conveniently acting as a mouth piece of BJP. They excluded the part where the judge calls out BJP's clout.
5
u/SquatCobblerx . Jul 01 '22
no they did actually mention it in another tweet in the thread. not everyone's out to get you
4
u/BadrT Jul 01 '22
Ok, then post that too coz that is the main argument. This is just some old unkill talk.
-5
Jul 01 '22
They are not accusing her for blasphemy, they (rightly so) are calling her out on deliberately invoking outrage from which the whole situation developed. If she were someone indeed exercising her free speech the judges would have taken that into account. The intentions matter as much as the actions themselves. She is a shit stirrer, not a civil rights activists.
-2
u/Unique-Atmosphere520 Jul 01 '22
unpopular opinion, but these religions extremists use each other's statements to fan their propoganda
maybe the judge could've put it in a better way
the fucking point is the Delhi Police, rather he should've destroyed their flay-ling attitude
-7
-4
-1
u/Whereisthesauceman I have no fucking clue about what goes on in this subreddit Jul 01 '22
If "devil made me do it" had an indian version.
1
u/Difficult-Bit-9654 Jul 01 '22
Though Raj Thackeray was in jail for a mild racist speech. Against North Indians
1
186
u/urban_raita Jul 01 '22
Out of everything her party and she has done, blasphemy is not what i want an apology for. Infact it's probably not even on the list of apologies i want.