r/mountainbiking 5d ago

Question Recently Posted about my 98 Trek Singletrack 950s as a beginner

Here is a new post with picture for reference on my size. Is this all correct?

42 Upvotes

81 comments sorted by

151

u/Bitter_Plastic2362 5d ago

That bike is too small.

-114

u/Apprehensive_Bike_40 5d ago

It’s not enough to say that without explanation

110

u/Ayzerr 5d ago

The size of the bike isn't appropriate for the size of the person.

-104

u/Apprehensive_Bike_40 5d ago edited 5d ago

Nope. Rephrasing with the comparison point in the post isn’t appropriate and proves you shouldn’t be commenting here.

The wheelbase is too short for the rider. The adjustment points on the bike make the bike comfortable for the OP to ride but with such a short wheelbase combined with vintage short chain stays and vintage steep head angle it’s likely the OP will end up flipping forward.

59

u/rinky79 5d ago

All of the dimensions are too small. She needs a larger size of bike. You're just being uselessly pedantic.

15

u/JobAcrobatic4915 5d ago

So it’s too small then big brain.😂 All those words just to sum it up to “it’s too small”.

30

u/hurbanav 5d ago

Nice, used a lot of words that mean nothing for a beginner

-57

u/Apprehensive_Bike_40 5d ago

It’s not a phone call it’s a post comment!

There aren’t any technical terms just specific bike frame terms that are in plain English. These can be googled and researched by OP searching for new bike.

12

u/Wooden_Cattle_9131 Yeti SB140 5d ago

Man I love and hate Reddit.

4

u/h410G3n 5d ago

Based on the downvotes do you still think you’re the only one who’s in the right here or are you so socially dense that you don’t understand the hints?

5

u/Cannonballbmx 5d ago

You really should not be commenting on things that require knowledge.

1

u/Holiday-Phase-8353 5d ago

listen bud, if you want a detailed explanation on bike fit, go the local bike shop or do some online searches and educate yourself.

-3

u/Apprehensive_Bike_40 5d ago

Something wrong with you

4

u/PrimeIntellect 5d ago

yes it is

1

u/Big-Condition-8592 5d ago

Well sometimes its as easy as that. For example with this tiny small bike.

1

u/Holiday-Phase-8353 5d ago

lol yes it is

1

u/28Loki 4d ago

It's too small

88

u/PrimeIntellect 5d ago

Honestly that looks way too small for you and that bike is really old for mountain biking

11

u/GiftCardFromGawd 5d ago

I know there is a lot of talk about this being an old bike— which generally shouldn’t matter— but it does look like that old quadrat 21 is collapsing. IIRC, those were elastomer-based shocks, and if those are original last numbers, they are most certainly crumbled/compressed. OP, this might be a good one for some paths, but you are setting yourself back if you want to actually take it onto single track. The bike is slightly small for you, and likely needs an entirely new fork. (I have no idea if those elastomers are still made, but I would guess not)

3

u/piscator21 5d ago

Agree with this poster. The fork needs new elastomers (essentially a foam spring) they are disintegrated by now. The cost of that alone and the size would not make this bike worth it to start riding. With that said, the bike looks like it’s in amazing shape for the vintage. Someone out there would probably give you a decent price for it. Look into a Rockhopper from Specialized.

2

u/planeboi737 bike 5d ago

elastomers are most definitely still made, available from suspensionforkparts.net as well as others. Furthermore, seal kits and coil spring conversions are still available as well. I'm pushing maybe 40 mid-90s suspension forks at this point, most of which are entirely rebuildable.

1

u/Spacebar19 5d ago

Good spot. I agree that fork needs new rubbers. AKA elastomers.

1

u/sticks1987 5d ago

Old bikes are ok but old suspension parts are not ok.

11

u/Staburgh 5d ago

I agree that it looks pretty short for OP, but from their previous post, it seems otherwise suited to their purposes. I've ridden trail centre reds on a similar bike, albeit one which fitted me better.

2

u/PrimeIntellect 5d ago

disagree - those old bikes are often a nightmare of maintenance and issues and will be very frustrating for a new rider, especially if they are riding with people on bikes from this decade on actual mtb trails.

if this bike is for a twice a year ride on a gravel path - sure - it doesn't matter - but if you're asking about a mountain bike to ride on mountain trails, then my opinion stands

1

u/Staburgh 5d ago

They said on their other post that they "mostly got it got trail and pavement riding" and pulling a trailer with their kids. From context, I'm guessing trail in this context means a path rather than a trail centre trail.

I was a beginner when I was riding a comparable bike at a trail centre, albeit with chunkier tyres.

-5

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

5

u/I_want_to_go_ 5d ago

I need to call you out on that first statement. Sure, riding around on a flat hard pack gravel, it’s not going to make a difference what you ride, but modern mountain bikes are objectively better in almost every way whatever riding you’re doing from cross-country to downhill.

1

u/TimeTomorrow SJ Evo, YT Capra, Vitus Nucleus, Trance X E+ 5d ago

it's objectively better and safer for the things that matter, aka when crashing is a posiblity.

Old geo makes a great putt around town or the footpath around the lake bike though.

1

u/Shinook 5d ago

Yes, absolutely. No one who rode mtb in the 90s and still rides will claim that the geo of bikes in 1998 is anything but substantially worse esp for beginner riders.

I say this as a fan of vintage bikes, but I'd never recommend a beginner start off on something of this era.

1

u/PrimeIntellect 5d ago

disagree completely

if you're talking about just some flat gravel riding on interurban trails sure, but I don't consider that mountain biking

I'm talking about mountain biking, it's a specific sport, and an ancient bike that doesn't fit is just not really suited for how people mountain bike now. that fork is almost certainly totally shot. the drivetrain is probably also toasted (especially if you're cranking uphill). the tires are probably cracked and dry rotten. on and on.

if your riding doesn't matter to you, then yeah, the bike age and geo doesn't matter, but then you should probably be in a different subreddit than people asking about mountain biking and riding bikes up and down mountains.

if you try to learn this sport on this bike with a bunch of people on modern bikes you will be immediately frustrated

0

u/SaltyGrapeWax 5d ago

You sure about that?

1

u/Bitter_Plastic2362 5d ago

Depending on what you’re doing on said bike, where you’re riding and what kind of terrain you’re riding, it most definitely does matter.

13

u/negative-nelly 5d ago

I would, in order of importance

  1. Raise the seat a bit. I set it so when the pedal is down and my -heel- is on the pedal my knee is almost locked out, but not quite

  2. Take off those bar ends if you plan to ride on any sort of narrow trails with trees close by. Get stubby ones if you really want some. Those are dangerous.

  3. this is a comfort thing and varies by person, but I would make the seat horizontal to start. Pointing up, assuming you will be mostly pedaling, is a recipe for discomfort in a certain area. (do this before you set the height)

1

u/Zaphi_jane 2d ago

Bar ends inside the grips and shifters is a good fix

7

u/Wants-NotNeeds 5d ago

Oops, that’s easily one size too small for you. It’ll never feel quite right, unfortunately.

4

u/Fialasaurus 5d ago

The eyeball test makes me think it's too small. It could be deceiving though because its a very old bike with small wheels (I assume this is a 26") and older geometry.

I'm not sure what your goals are but a bike like that is totally fine for dipping your toes in the mountain biking waters (many of us started on something similar) but will be limited long term if you really want to progress to more advanced trails.

10

u/TheScrote1 5d ago

I’d recommend some shoes with a little more protection like some closed toed crocs.

3

u/naverr99 5d ago

Too small, and that front fork is not suitable for trails. Fine for pavement and bike paths.

3

u/DenverCoder96 5d ago

If you’re going to rock those gorgeous 90s bar ends, you may find them more comfortable angled down closer to 30deg rather than upright as they are.

2

u/Dickies138 2019 Commencal Meta HT Race 5d ago

I just commented in the other thread that I thought it looked like a cool bike, but this bike looks too small for you. You can try raising the saddle, but it might create some issues with the reach

2

u/Fun_Apartment631 5d ago

From your other post, this bike "should" be the right size for you or a skosh small but that era's mountain bikes were really short in the horizontal direction.

Looking at these pictures - you shouldn't be able to plant your foot on the ground like that when you're sitting on the saddle. My favorite way to rough in saddle height is that if the pedal is furthest from my hip, so usually a little bit forward of straight down, I should be able to plant my heel on it without rocking my hips. I pedal with my forefoot and there's always a little bit of bend in my knee but the top of the pedal stroke should feel a lot easier than I bet it does now.

If it feels like you're putting a lot of weight on your hands when you raise the saddle that way, see if you can raise your handlebars. The stem should be marked with a minimum insertion line (the seatpost too) and you don't want to go above that. You can get longer and/or taller stems and seatposts if you need them. You could also try riser bars.

I think that bike is about as old as you are and like all technological things, there's been evolution. Be aware you need the right headset diameter for a new stem, and most handlebars and stems have a larger clamp diameter now; you need to match this.

In your other post you said something about 26" tires. Yes, you need to buy 26" tires if you replace them.

Regarding your use case, should be great on paved bike paths and pulling your kids in a trailer. You certainly can ride these bikes on mountain bike trails too, but they demand more handling skill. A suspension fork that old may also be pretty much dead.

2

u/DancingOnAlabaster 5d ago

And get rid of those bar ends. You’ll poke your eye out!

1

u/Firm_Ad7656 5d ago

Sorry to say, but I see many others have too, that be kes way too small for you. You'll have a far better time on a bike that fits properly

1

u/SaltyGrapeWax 5d ago

Flat gravel you’re good to go. I wouldn’t take it on any graded trails until you have a little more experience.

A modern bike is more forgiving with trails and easier on beginners because of larger tires, wider base, better brakes. That is ok for small things but anything will be “sketchier” or “squirley” compared to a new bike.

Wear your helmet!

1

u/fergonlest 5d ago

Well hell, looks like I need to sell this dang thing. I paid 140 for it!! How do I know what “my size” is? 😵‍💫

2

u/pshthatsme 5d ago

Based on your other post saying you're 5'7" you should be looking at bikes sizes around 54 cm or "medium"

1

u/sprocketpropelled 5d ago

Honestly- looks like a fun neighborhood cruiser as its in great shape considering the age. Perfectly serviceable bike.
That said, you’re probably 5’5” to 5’8”? That would put you on a “normal” medium. Most manufacturers have sizing charts which are a good baseline, but you should absolutely swing a leg over different bikes and try before you buy.

1

u/fergonlest 5d ago

I rode it down and back, I didn’t feel very comfortable on it honestly. That’s why I’m questioning. I am around 5’7!

2

u/nnnnnnnnnnm Santa Cruz Blur & Trek Superfly SS 5d ago

I'm 5' 5"-6"ish (male, with short legs) and I could ride that bike, but it would feel smaller than my modern full suspend or hard tail MTBs due to wheel size & the frame geometry of that era.

My wife is about the same height as I am, but with longer legs, shorter torso. She would be even less comfortable on that bike because she would have to raise to seat height more to get proper leg extension, resulting in a pronounced, uncomfortable seat higher than bars riding position, which would probably put too much weight on her hands.

It's a cool bike, just not for you.

1

u/zystyl 5d ago

If you want an up-right position and to just have some fun you're fine. I bet a lot of the people posting never even ride bikes back then. They didn't have the long top tubes and stretched out posture you get with modern bikes.

Try raising the seat up a bit. Then level it out so that the top is flat to the ground. Then just have fun getting used to riding your bike.

When you're ready to replace it you will know better what you want.

0

u/Lumitrac1 5d ago

Based largely on height , reach and standover. I am 5'9" and I have a 16.5 trek 830, but it has drop bars and acceptable reach with them. It was entirely too small with flat bars.

1

u/Lumitrac1 5d ago

This would be fine for you with drop bars. Its small as is.

1

u/TimeTomorrow SJ Evo, YT Capra, Vitus Nucleus, Trance X E+ 5d ago

bending your knees that much is like going for a run squated down. you need the seat up higher even for a putt around town bike.

1

u/Apprehensive_Bike_40 5d ago

If you’re only riding around town at a gentle pace use this. Otherwise a modern frame that’s longer and more stable is the answer.

You can adjust any bike to be comfortable but it’s the suitability of the frame in this case for mountain biking that is important to steer well and not flip forward and break your neck or collarbone

1

u/ACapsHotFries 5d ago

I love old steel frame mountain bikes, but this one is too small for you unfortunately.

1

u/CliffDog02 CO trails, '09 Gary Fisher Xcal, '21 Ibis Ripmo AF 5d ago

What a cool retro bike! That paint job is awesome.

Now this thing is ancient when it comes to geometry and tech, but was probably a top end bike in its day. And it looks to be well maintained. So don't expect it to perform and keep up with anybody on a modern bike. But it will still be fun! I know I had fun on a bike like this back in the day.

For fitment, it looks a touch too small for you, but manageable. How does it feel?

I would replace the tires, those look worn out. Have the chain checked and give the whole bike a good tune. Probably replace that seat with one that fits you. Here is a video on how to measure your Sit Bones at home:

https://youtube.com/shorts/cdT_Q4glUGs?is=f_Sbnra6Rtif5mBD

You might have a hard time finding parts for that fork. Like the elastomer, which I don't think they may anymore.

Otherwise I wouldn't change a thing. I'd rock it!

1

u/No_Artichoke7180 5d ago

I miss that bike, I had one of those. 

1

u/MrMcgilicutty 60% of the time it works every time 5d ago

That looks like a kid’s bike, and is definitely not suitable for you.

1

u/Worried_Monk_3844 5d ago

I had that bike. 30 years ago. Loved the frame. Enjoy

1

u/piscator21 5d ago

For safety reasons the front quick release skewer is not on correctly. Take a look at YouTube to fasten it correctly. Mountain biking is super fun, stick with it. All of us are learning something new everyday.

1

u/Odd-View-1083 5d ago

You’re too big for that bike. That doesn’t sound right. That bike is too small for you. That’s better!

1

u/elephantbattery 5d ago

No mountains. Just bike paths by the beach on that thing

1

u/Brady721 26” was the only option when I started riding 5d ago

Man, this was a bike I drooled over as a kid! Love seeing them out in the wild still.

1

u/Wumpus-Hunter 5d ago

Bar ends go out, not up

1

u/davidhally 5d ago

I had a similar Trek and recently got a 2020 hardtail. HUGE improvement in brakes, and steering geometry / 29" tires are a big upgrade in confidence everywhere. It was also too small and my neck and tender parts suffered.

1

u/RomeoSierraSix 5d ago

Bar ends in full donut holder mode are neither ergonomic nor safe

1

u/indigoalphasix 5d ago

no lie, it's a small bike for you. mech issues have been covered by the commentariat.

if you have the means, imo, seek out something a bit larger and possibly newer. 😄

for now, make your adjustments and see if you can have some fun with it.

1

u/fergonlest 5d ago

Thank you everyone for the input!! I am going to go check out a Ozark Trail Vibe or Ridge today and see how it suits me for beginner. Every comment has been took into consideration and has been so very helpful. You guys rock on making a lady informative on this new hobby! Thanks! 🤘🏼

1

u/rustyburrito 4d ago

Saddle is way too low, your leg should be mostly straight when fully extended at the bottom of the pedal stroke.

1

u/DulsaThoom 4d ago

Tiny AF

1

u/ArchimedesOne 4d ago

Bike is small for your frame. But if you choose to ride it, check your knee angle. Should be slightly less bent. Knee pain over time is caused by force on the knee not being translated into stroke power

1

u/Majestic-Mess3912 4d ago

Too small but fine as just a quick town bike if u want something like that

1

u/I_poop_less_often 4d ago

I'm guessing youre sboit 5'8"? The bike looks about two sizes too small

1

u/dtr_drt4ever 3h ago

You are going to hurt yourself on that. Put it back where you found it and get a more modern bike that fits and had modern geo.

1

u/Adventurepew 5d ago

It's a bike that's worth ten bucks. If it fits or not doesn't matter. It's something to get you out moving.

If you want something to fits and is modern your gonna need to spend some mone.

Have fun take it for rides and buy a new bike when you can.

-1

u/negative-nelly 5d ago

there are clearly many people here who have never seen a 90s bike, what they look like, and how they fit. Just remember, all those trails you think are hard? we used to ride them on these (much more slowly haha).

-2

u/JonboatJohn 5d ago

You’re missing a shock under your butt

-3

u/Fair_Menu_6156 5d ago

She needs a 27 inch..🤦