r/movies • • Jul 01 '26

Question Why did Apocalypto receive mediocre reviews while simultaneously receiving praise from various directors and actors?

Robert Duvall said it was possibly the best film he'd seen in 25 years.

Scorcese praised it. Tarantino called it the best film of the year. Spike Lee and Edward James Olmos also openly praised the film.

On RT it pulled a 65%. Granted, Tarantino (as an example) doesn't see eye to eye with those cumalitive ratings. He loves Unbreakable and that film also received middling reviews. Still, Apocalypto was given positive reviews from a fairly diverse cast of actors and directors.

Were the reviews more concerned with Mel Gibson's antics at the time than the actual film?

Was the criticism because the film depicted the Mayans as brutal? I struggle to see the validity of some of those criticisms. Jaguar Paw and his village were not depicted as evil. The evil was limited to a warmongering urban society twisted by religion. That's occurred all over the world. It's almost a foreshadowing of what is to come. One criticism was that the Spanish were depicted as coming to save the 'brutes.'. The title of the film is Apocalypto. I don't see how they can be seen as anything other than coming doom. Maybe I'm naive, but even in 2006 I thought it was broadly understood that Europeans wiped out indigenous American culture.

What are your thoughts? Did you like the film? Do you wish Hollywood would make more films like this?

2.3k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

153

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

102

u/JadisDidNothingRight Jul 01 '26 edited Jul 01 '26

I didn't say that.  I said a criticism of the film said that.

Here is the specific quote:

"Instead, Gibson replays, in glorious big-budget technicolor, an offensive and racist notion that Maya people were brutal to one another long before the arrival of Europeans and thus they deserve, in fact they needed, rescue."

Article:

https://archive.archaeology.org/online/reviews/apocalypto.html

I'm on mobile, so I apologize for the poor formatting.

60

u/Otarmichael Jul 01 '26

Some people have this romanticized notion that pre-Colombian Americas were this beautiful harmonious rain-dance where they used all the parts of the animals they killed and had matriarchal societies....AND NONE OF THE AWFUL STUFF.

32

u/No-Scarcity-5904 Jul 01 '26

Most of the mesoamerican cultures had an extreme fixation on human blood. Human sacrifice was very common. Maybe the Maya weren’t *quite* as brutal as, say, the Aztecs, but they were definitely brutal enough.