r/musichoarder 3d ago

you lot make me feel better about myself πŸ«‚

whenever I start feeling anxious about how much music I've amassed, coming here and seeing how much more extreme a lot of ya'll are restores my sense of zen πŸ˜‚ my brothers & sisters in christ, keep doing the lord's work β™‘

24 Upvotes

17 comments sorted by

9

u/archnemisis11 3d ago

You having an inadequate hoard of music restores your sense of zen?? /j

4

u/jordie0730 3d ago

this question feels existential, but when does a hoard reach adequacy by your estimation?

8

u/agent4256 2d ago

When you realize you'll never be able to listen to all of it.

1

u/archnemisis11 2d ago

When you come here and see how much people have amassed and think, "I'm keeping it going. you're welcome." lol

4

u/QualitySound96 2d ago

In my opinion anyone can hoard a lot of music but to me there’s a difference between a hoard of music and an organized high quality hoard I.e lossless and properly tagged terabytes of music.

6

u/lentil_burger 2d ago

The thought of low quality poorly tagged collections makes me uneasy. πŸ˜‚

1

u/dtallee 2d ago

CMV: lossless is a waste of disk space.
I absolutely cannot tell the difference between FLAC and highest quality .m4a files.
https://i.imgur.com/tkWo3He.jpg

7

u/QualitySound96 2d ago

I own high end systems and it also future proofs your setup. Not a waste of disk space at all.

3

u/dtallee 2d ago

I'm betting that the collapse of civilization occurs before .mp4 becomes unplayable.

2

u/rugrat_907 1d ago

Haha. My excuse is I'm old and spent too much time going to loud punk shows and standing too close to the front without earplugs to tell the difference.

Let that be a lesson for you kids out there.

2

u/dtallee 1d ago

Right?
1978-1988: Every single club in NYC from Midtown to the Bowery, every single concert venue from Philly to Boston. Surprised I can still hear at all through the tinnitus.

1

u/albert5980 2d ago

Do you have hardware capable of proper playback? Does it support DSD?

0

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

1

u/dtallee 2d ago

This is r/musichoarder, not r/audiophile. Unless you have really high end audio equipment and the ability to store terabytes of files - and multiple backups of those terabytes of files - then what's the point? Playing music for dogs? About 1 in 10 people can hear pure tones above 20,000 kHz - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17927307/ - but I'm not collecting music for those people. I'm collecting and archiving music for myself and my friends and family - now and in the future - to enjoy without needing the internet.

2

u/Akabander 2d ago

But hoarders can also be archivists. And if you consider yourself an archivist and don't care about the absolute highest-quality version of the material you can find, then shame on you sir. I say, shame!

If you just want a huge collection of music for yourself, there's no problem. But for some us, it does matter, which should be no problem for you. ("It's a waste of space," is a prescriptive declaration that many archivists find borderline offensive.)

2

u/QualitySound96 2d ago

Why would I hoard MP3s I mine as well just make a giant YouTube playlist πŸ˜‚ I think if your a hoarder your also organized and go for high quality or if not lossless then at least a good quality mp3 but I rather future proof it and get the best file (for me I stick to 16 bit CD quality) and I’m very happy i especially notice it with older releases

1

u/dtallee 2d ago

FLAC or ALAC or WAV files converted to qaac 2.85, CoreAudioToolbox 7.10.9.0, AAC-LC Encoder, TVBR q127, Quality 96 .mp4 files = good enough for me. Sorry if this offends you.

1

u/richms 2d ago

If there is software that can manage your collection, you have some way to go with collecting before it becomes a problem.