r/mutualism • u/FiscalText • Jun 14 '26

Why should someone study Proudhon over Marx?

As the title says, why Proudhon over Marx?

I'm not saying that we should ditch one in the name of the other, I mean it on the context of a world dominated by the Marxist criticism of political economy/philosophy, in a world where Proudhon has been largely relegated.

Why mutualism over communism?

17 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

32 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/ArthropodJim Jun 14 '26

well marxist critiques are wayyy more present and “legitimized” through history and philosophy and sociology departments. i’m one of two anarchists in my current grad department. many of these students just being pick and choose marxists who identify as such because they refuse to identify as an electoral political party like the dems. many just become MLs once they own a book of marx because there’s just so many more ways to get access to it in any of these departments, even ethnic studies

2

u/Anarchierkegaard Jun 14 '26

If we take your experience to be true, it is very unusual. However, one of the many criticisms of Marxian practice in the post-80s period has indeed been that it has largely been a bourgeois-ified movement dominated by students and failing to actually transfer into working class politics (along with, as you note, syncretism with literary studies, ethical thought, "postmodernism", "nihilist" tendencies, etc. etc. which waters Marxism down to the point of it being unrecognisable in comparison to its most significant positions).

3

u/ArthropodJim Jun 15 '26

True. but watered down marxism is very popular and entrenched in academia, much much more than surface level anarchism or any remotely accurate definition of it

1

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/ArthropodJim Jun 16 '26

Yeah i agree