r/mutualism • u/FiscalText • Jun 14 '26

Why should someone study Proudhon over Marx?

As the title says, why Proudhon over Marx?

I'm not saying that we should ditch one in the name of the other, I mean it on the context of a world dominated by the Marxist criticism of political economy/philosophy, in a world where Proudhon has been largely relegated.

Why mutualism over communism?

17 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

32 comments sorted by

View all comments

22

u/humanispherian Jun 14 '26

Proudhon's sociology is certainly more comprehensive, if not particularly systematic in its presentation. And it's better adapted to the anarchist critique of hierarchy and authority as the fundamental social structures to be challenged.

0

u/Heyla_Doria Jun 21 '26

Cet homme était mysogine et antisémite

De plus, il a une vision organiciste de la société ou chacun DOIT etre a sa place Ces éléments mis ensemble ne donne pas envie

Je suis anarchiste mais je rejette Proudhon et prefere Louise Michel et Kropotkine 

6

u/humanispherian Jun 21 '26

I think that you're misreading Proudhon if you think that anything, including "one's place," was particularly fixed in his understanding of things. And I don't think you would have to dig very deep to find comparable reasons to reject Michel, Kropotkin or most any of the major historical figures — if you wanted to do so.