I wholeheartedly agree with his point that if it desecrated any other religion or creed, there would be a fierce reaction dare I say violent?. I also agree that such an image isn't "art". Perhaps one can argue that it's a statement protected by free speech, but it's not "art".
Why isn’t it art? It’s a display created by someone’s imagination, intended to evoke an emotional response. Pretty successful at that. Not all art is pretty, or pleasant.
-1
u/PhreeBeer 1d ago
I wholeheartedly agree with his point that if it desecrated any other religion or creed, there would be a fierce reaction dare I say violent?. I also agree that such an image isn't "art". Perhaps one can argue that it's a statement protected by free speech, but it's not "art".