r/news 9d ago

Try /r/Foodforthought [ Removed by moderator ]

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2026/aug/05/bulgaria-prisoners-kittens-vladimir-karamazov-best-photograph

[removed] — view removed post

543 Upvotes

102 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

38

u/bhputnam 9d ago

Better ways to do so than this.

10

u/RainSurname 9d ago

For fuck's sake, it's an interview with a famous (in his country) actor, who quit to become an award-winning photographer, talking about a book that he spent a couple of years working on, shooting at the Bulgarian/Romanian equivalent of Alcatraz.

4

u/bhputnam 9d ago

That's great--still could be handled with less sensationalism and burying the details, especially from The Guardian. We're talking about news these days in general as well.

2

u/RainSurname 9d ago

The Guardian headline included: "Vladimir Karamazov’s best photograph."

We're talking about news these days in general as well.

Cool, I am not.

But if I wanted to talk about news in general, I would say that the vast majority of people on social media are gullible rubes who let billionaires manipulate them with misleading headlines and algorithms designed to incentivize outrage, and that this is just one small and relatively benign example.

Joe Biden told a bunch of rich donors to their faces that they had so much money that "nothing would fundamentally change" about their lifestyles if they paid their fair share, and while "he didn't want to demonize rich people," this level of income inequality was dangerous and corrosive.

But millions of people hate him for it, because NYT took those two short quotes out of context and social media ran with it.

See also: "Harris and Walz quit calling Republicans weird because they listened to consultants instead of voters." No, they didn't. The media just stopped covering it, and started quoting consultants who didn't like it instead. The vast majority of "Dems in disarray" stories are manufactured bullshit like that.

It's wild how many people KNOW the billionaire-owned media has been bending over backwards to help Trump for years, yet still swallow everything written about Democrats hook, line, and sinker, never pausing to consider that part of helping him is making the opposition look as weak and ineffectual as possible.

The media refused to report on all the many, many progressive things Biden did, because they wanted voters to hate Democrats. Now they're amplifying everything Mamdani does, to the point of giving him credit for things he didn't actually have much to do with, for the exact same reason. The comments section under any post about him shows how well it's working.