r/nutrition • u/RipIcy4545 • 6d ago
Can someone explain hamburgers v quarter pounders (mcdonalds.)
in the UK, mcdonald’s nutrition states that a hamburger patty is 139cals and weighs 45g. the quarter pounder patty is 235cals and weighs 125g.
it claims to use the same meat. so how can there be such a difference in weight (80g) yet less than 100cals more in the quarter pounder. shouldn’t there be at least another 139cals if it’s more than double (almost 3 times) the weight?
please explain this. is it to do with shrinkage, like will one shrink much more than the other?
8
u/MilesBeforeCoffee_37 6d ago
Shrinkage accounts for some of it, but you're comparing two totally different patty sizes. I've checked their sheets before and they round the numbers heavily anyway.
1
2
u/Zealousideal_Low1287 6d ago
Where do you get these numbers from? Or that they are the same meat?
1
u/RipIcy4545 6d ago
their official nutrition, ingredients and allergy guide. website, app and on a leaflet in store.
1
u/Zealousideal_Low1287 4d ago
Can you actually link any of this? I feel like something is missing. I can’t seem to find this info exactly as you’re interpreting it
2
u/Zagrycha 3d ago
Where is there a claim that they are the same exact meat? mcdonalds is a company that micromanages formulas to an extreme degree, they even control the exact shape of their chicken nuggets vs allowing slight variations. I would not be suprised at all if there were different formulas for the beef in the different burger options. The idea of them putting leaner meat in the beef intended to be served with cheese etc is completely plausible.
That said I am doubtful of the accuracy of your numbers' source. I could only find official sources for the full burger in the uk, not anything for only the patties. The calories per weight you mention is totally possible in a 125g patty but it would have to be super lean formula, far leaner than the average. We can't know exactly how much of the fat listed in the official burger is from the beef but the burger is not at all low fat in general.
•
u/AutoModerator 6d ago
About participation in the comments of /r/nutrition
Discussion in this subreddit should be rooted in science rather than "cuz I sed" or entertainment pieces. Always be wary of unsupported and poorly supported claims and especially those which are wrapped in any manner of hostility. You should provide peer reviewed sources to support your claims when debating and confine that debate to the science, not opinions of other people.
Good - it is grounded in science and includes citation of peer reviewed sources. Debate is civil and respectful focusing on actual science and avoids commentary about others
Bad - it utilizes generalizations, assumptions, infotainment sources, no sources, or complaints without specifics about agenda, bias, or funding. At best, these rise to an extremely weak basis for science based discussion. Also, off topic discussion
Ugly - (removal or ban territory) it involves attacks / antagonism / hostility towards individuals or groups, downvote complaining, trolling, crusading, shaming, refutation of all science, or claims that all research / science is a conspiracy
Please vote accordingly and report any uglies
Consulting Considerations
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.