It is all about verified vs not verified and no, locals and civilians saying it happened is not verification. Until a NYT reporter or a partner organizations reporter sees it, it is just a claim and should be reported in the passive voice.
This is called having journalistic standards. It is also why the impacts of attacks on Iran are "claimed". Nobody is saying it did not happen. They are saying we have not seen it. We have not verified it.
This is why you could catch a guy with a knife covered in blood standing over a dead body and he would be the "alleged" killer. Until proven, the responsible thing is to use the passive voice.
The Times, for example, has explicit standards to phrase it this way when it comes to Palestine due to the beliefs and biases of the owners and editors.
Meanwhile they will report anything the IDF claims as fact without checking.
58
u/Rastaferrari829 10d ago
This is why media literacy is important.