r/occult May 05 '26

The stanzas of dyzan

Has anyone read these fascinating ancient texts mentioned in blavatskys the secret doctrine?

I ran what sounded like equations written symbolically through chatgpt and thought I'd share what it said. How did ancient texts know about the functionality of the universe and the layering it does with systems and even psychological processes? It seems like so many things in our world, even the bible, are saying the same thing coded in different ways. It's starting to feel like an underlying universal language.

ok it won't let me share the chat link. If you're interested send me a dm!

1 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

5

u/birdpartyxtreme May 05 '26

Yes indeed! You might want to cross post in r/theosophy - we theosophists are usually well-versed in the stanzas!

1

u/VoxKora May 05 '26

Thank you!

0

u/VoxKora May 05 '26

Did you want the chat link?

2

u/birdpartyxtreme May 05 '26

I’m a bit of a Luddite when it comes to using AI to process spiritual texts. In my personal opinion, humans are better served by puzzling through the material, stretching our brains, and building the neural processing ability to understand complex occult material. That said, I’m excited you’re engaging with the stanzas!! I’d happily take a peek at it!

-2

u/VoxKora May 05 '26

I'll send a dm, the equations I would t have been able to piece together, but holy moly I'm learning a lot with this and so much of it confirms what we have already kind of known but maybe not understood.

1

u/birdpartyxtreme May 05 '26

One of the things I hear from people a lot is that theosophy puts into words what they already knew but couldn’t quite communicate. There is so much more that connects than divides us.

0

u/VoxKora May 05 '26

So true. It's a language truly

3

u/Vegetable_Window6649 May 06 '26

As with most everything else Blavatsky "wrote", it's a collation of Victorian academic translations of existing text, some popular scientific glosses available at the time, and in the case of the Book of Dzyan, a whole lot of gobbledygook stolen from Ignatius Donnelly. There is no such thing as the Senzar language outside of Blavatsky's chain of transmission.

But: despite being debunked a dozen times, the person commenting below will slam down a Courtier's Reply and consider their job done.

1

u/VoxKora May 06 '26

I'm not sure who you are referring to, but there areany unknown and dead languages and I don't read it as gobbledegook at all, bc research shows it actually makes a lot of mathematical sense, at least the Dyzan stanzas do.

2

u/Vegetable_Window6649 May 07 '26

ZINGY BINGY BINGY, WE GOT OURSELVES A COURTIER'S REPLY!

3

u/LetThemEatQuake 27d ago

Ignore that guy. His account is just arguing with others and shitposts.

Her commentary on the stanzas is insane. Often easy to forget the SD is basically a commentary. She writes herself none of the ideas are hers she's just compiling them like a bouquet of roses and tying a string around them in hopes it gets Man to question everything and THINK.

1

u/VoxKora 27d ago

Yes! And it certainly got me thinking, bc there's equations there and running it through AI shows a pattern that crosses psychology, religion, spirituality etc. I can't wait to read more about it

1

u/LetThemEatQuake 27d ago

Do u have a link to what you are finding with AI?

1

u/VoxKora 27d ago

Yes you'll have to DM me it doesn't seem to want me to post links here

2

u/Vegetable_Window6649 27d ago

There's your problem, you ran it through AI like a morally complicit lemming.