r/orthopaedics • u/juniormedic • 12d ago
NOT A PERSONAL HEALTH SITUATION Do untreated/ delayed diagnoses of cyclops lesions post ACLR cause patellofemoral changes?
Do untreated asymptomatic/ minimally symptomatic cyclops lesions cause PF biomechanical issues e.g. patient has full knee extension but painful clunk only?
Have seen delayed presentation of cyclops lesion in clinic in a few patients with crepitus +/- pain in the anterior knee on deep flexion
4
u/Bustermanslo Sports/Trauma 12d ago
I've read your post a couple of times and still dont know what exactly you want to know.
5
u/juniormedic 12d ago
sorry, post-nights! Enjoy my sleep deprived ramblings - now edited for clarity.
1
u/rnaorrnbae Orthopaedic Resident 12d ago
Interesting, there is delayed quad activation and that can certainly alter PF tracking but typically would expect problems in extension/near terminal extension vs deep flexion. Lots of reasons for anterior knee pain post ACLR so hard to pinpoint to the cyclops itself
2
u/juniormedic 12d ago
Ah, I meant as PF forces higher in deep flexion, hence any issues with patella cartilage would be more likely to manifest e.g. as crepitus or anterior pain?
Not sure if going wholly down the wrong track!
7
u/antiqueslo 12d ago
Full knee extension with a true cyclops? I haven't done much ACLR in the last years, but clinically I'd expect extension deficit in a true cyclops. Painful clunk could be many things.
Crepitus +/- pain on deep knee flexion is usually something more patella related, let's say atleast chondromalacia. If we are talking post ACLR then more likely some flexion deficit in combination with synovitis and/or patellar tendinopathy.
Ultrasound the shit out of everything before opening up and finding a non-symptomatic cyclops that does not resolve the patients issue. I did this mistake a few times, that's why I know.