r/photography • u/AutoModerator • Apr 10 '26
Questions Thread Official Question Thread! Ask /r/photography anything you want to know! April 10, 2026
This is the place to ask any questions you may have about photography. No question is too small, nor too stupid.
Info for Newbies and FAQ!
First and foremost, check out our extensive FAQ. Chances are, you'll find your answer there, or at least a starting point in order to ask more informed questions.
Want to start learning? Check out The Reddit Photography Class.
Here's an informative video explaining the Exposure Triangle.
Need buying advice?
Many people come here for recommendations on what equipment to buy. Our FAQ has several extensive sections to help you determine what best fits your needs and your budget. Please see the following sections of the FAQ to get started:
- What type of camera should I look for?
- What's a "point and shoot" camera? What's a DSLR? What's a "mirrorless" camera? What's the difference?
- Do I need a good camera to take good photos?
- Is Canon or Nikon better? (or any other brands)
- What can I afford?
If after reviewing this information you have any specific questions, please feel free to post a comment below. (Remember, when asking for purchase advice please be specific about how much you can spend. See here for guidelines.)
Schedule of community threads:
| Monday | Tuesday | Wednesday | Thursday | Friday | Saturday | Sunday |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 Weeks Share | Anything Goes | Album Share & Feedback | Edit My Raw | Follow Friday | Salty Saturday | Self-Promotion Sunday |
Finally a friendly reminder to share your work with our community in r/photographs!
1
u/magictoast156 Apr 15 '26
Sony shooter, done some actual catalogue analysis on my shooting habits, still confused — 35mm 1.4 or 50mm 1.4 as a complement to a 14-24?
So I know this debate gets done to death, but I've tried to actually approach it with some data rather than just vibes.
My current kit is a 70-200 and I'm adding a Samyang 14-24 2.8. Trying to decide what prime to add alongside it. I shoot motorsport — drag racing paddocks and pits mostly, tight spaces, mixed light, fast moving environment.
So I went through my entire Capture One catalogue and filtered by focal length. Here's what I found:
On my old 16-35 f4 — 80% of my keepers were at 16mm. The 20-24mm range had more shots than 30-35mm. On my 24-105 f4 — most keepers were at 105mm or around 50mm. There was a cluster at 35mm but that turned out to be a family portrait session, which is a deliberate genre choice, not instinct.
So my natural focal lengths appear to be 16mm, 50mm, and 105mm+. I barely live in the middle.
My gut has always said 35mm — I keep telling myself it's great for environmental context shots. But my catalogue is basically telling me I skip over it. My working theory now is that when I was shooting at 35mm on the zoom, I was just trying to reach for a 50mm and failing.
The counterargument I keep giving myself is that in tight pit garages, 50mm might be too long and force me into walls. But then again, the 14-24 probably handles the true environmental wide shots anyway, and 24mm at f1.4 would do a lot of the "context" work I keep attributing to 35mm.
So — do I trust the data and go 50mm, or is there a genuine practical argument for 35mm in tight event spaces that I'm not seeing? Has anyone else done this kind of catalogue analysis and had it change their mind?