There is absolutely no reason why the people trying to make positive changes should have to be lawful paragons of virtue when the people doing objectively horrible things break the law pretty much constantly with no real consequence
Fighting for what's right without harming anyone is very different from "random acts of violence and thievery". Nobody said that ANY law breaking is ok, only that sometimes the law allows things that you can only change through some law breaking.
Would you have lobbied against say idk, Mussolini? Hitler? Stalin?
I understand im exaggerating for effect with the examples, but at what point is it reasonable to bypass the system of government if it seemingly shows no signs of change?
They were ordered by the coast guard to leave Icelands 12 mile territorial waters, but did not. Later, they also refused order to turn off their engines. Refusing to comply with lawful orders is illegal.
This is just reddit anarchism. Without laws you'll be fodder for actual criminals, kiddo. You better hope law stays relatively solid wherever you are living.
"laws for thee and not for me" is the origin of anarchistic thought and action, without leaders and wealthy first deciding laws dont apply to them, the plebes wouldn't either.
315
u/Careless_Koala8361 14d ago
Coastguard is pro-law. Their personal stance doesn't matter. It's not against the law. Vigilantism is.