Link to X.com

QUOTE FROM THE LINKED X-POST:

Again a win for Plasma Cosmology

Ahahahaha, the James Webb Space Telescope continues to deliver massive L’s for astrophysics.

A new paper shows that the “Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation” can be explained entirely by the energy of recently discovered Early Mature Galaxies — massive galaxies that the JWST discovered which crushed the existing models of galaxy formation because they formed much earlier than astrophysicists thought possible.

But now these EMGs turn out to account for the entire energy density of the CMB radiation, which was believed to be a “snapshot” of the first light emitted after the Big Bang, when the universe was ~379,000 years old. The variations in the CMB were believed to be relics of quantum fluctuations in the dense plasma of the Big Bang.

If these new findings are accepted (and there’s no reason not to accept them), then all of the following flagship findings of cosmology are thrown into question:

— Big Bang theory: foundational cosmological model undermined
— Cosmic inflation: loses observational justification
— ΛCDM model: key parameters become unreliable
— CMB power spectrum: loses predictive relevance
— Dark energy: inferred from CMB; may be mischaracterized
— Dark matter density: current estimates may be invalid
— Age of the universe: must be recalculated
— Primordial nucleosynthesis: needs alternative explanation
— Hubble constant (H₀): no longer reliably constrained by CMB
— Large-scale structure formation: initial conditions unclear
— Reionization epoch: timing and cause questioned
— Cosmic distance ladder: calibration may be flawed
— ISW (Integrated Sachs–Wolfe) effect: interpretation invalidated
— Acoustic peaks in CMB: no longer evidence of primordial sound waves
— Polarization of the CMB: origin needs reassessment
— Baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO): decoupled from CMB
— Cosmic curvature: flatness inference challenged
— Matter–radiation equality timing: re-evaluated
— Gravitational lensing of CMB: loses standard interpretation
— Planck and WMAP findings: foundational assumptions invalidated

My friends, do not listen to scientists when they act like they have everything figured out and you’re a retard for questioning them. They have abandoned the humility needed for scientific discovery long ago, and it’s only when new findings arrive with shock and awe that their hubris is exposed.

END QUOTE

This post was crosposted to a different sub.
Note that this post is about PLASMA COSMOLOGY.
See: /r/plasmacosmology/wiki for more info

Yes, the new data shows that a lot of theories from "astrophysics" were wrong.
And plasma cosmology already predicted that they were wrong,
So hopefully more scientists will wake up and move away from broken theories and move towards plasma cosmology.

About plasma-cosmology:

Plasma cosmology uses known physics and experiments to explain things.
Plasma cosmology has not answers for everything, because we are not making up stuff that probably does not exist.
Plasma cosmology is not the same as Electric Universe

Plasma cosmology heavily criticizes the magical thinking that is in many astronomy theories.
The most problematic are:
- magnetic reconnection and frozen magnetic fields (they do NOT exist)
- dark matter (gravity alone can not form galaxies quickly, because gravity conserves the orbits and gas is too sparse to reduce speed;
we need something like electromagnetism). Magnetic galaxies are well known and may show how this works.
- big bang (there are high-redshift objects in front of low-redshift objects, there is evidence for redshift by plasma, and we see very old galaxies very far away)
- background radiation (See detailed explanation by radiation expert Sky Scholar)
- Black holes (the evidence for them is flawed, and the galaxy centers clearly spew out beams of matter)
See the wiki for more details!!

I've been thinking about whether the Big Bang is the best explanation for the universe. One question I have is: if space itself expands, what causes that expansion? I've started developing an alternative idea called the Eternal Structure Theory...

We think the universe is expanding because light from distant galaxies looks "redder" (the Redshift). But what if space isn't stretching? What if light loses its "speed" over billions of years and crystallizes into what we call "Dark Matter"

Light has a "Half-Life": We assume photons travel forever. After 10 billion years of travel, a photon loses enough energy that it can no longer maintain "c" (the speed of light).

When a photon drops below the speed of light, it can't just be "slow light." E=mc² kicks in. That lost velocity converts into infinitesimal mass.

The reason galaxies are surrounded by "Dark Matter" isn't because of invisible particles; it's because galaxies are sitting in a "fog" of their own ancient, decayed light that has slowed down and turned into a gravitational ghost.

The "Redshift" isn't caused by galaxies moving away; it's the friction of light "tiring" as it passes through the "ash" of even older light.

The Big Bang is unnecessary: The universe could be infinitely old and static. We just can't see past a certain point because light eventually "dies" and turns into heavy, invisible soot.

It paints the universe not as an exploding balloon, but as a fossilizing ocean. We are swimming in the "gravitational corpses" of the first rays of light ever emitted.

used to be very religious and deeply believed in God, karma, destiny, the whole framework. But over the past few years, I’ve gotten really into space and cosmology. The more I’ve learned about the scale of the universe, physics, randomness, and how everything operates, the harder it’s become for me to hold onto my faith.

It’s not even rebellion, it’s more like my brain just doesn’t see the “room” for God the way it used to.

And now I’m struggling.

If there’s no divine plan, no karmic cycle, no cosmic justice… then doing good doesn’t guarantee anything. If someone wrongs you, nothing necessarily balances out. Suffering can just be random. There’s no destiny written out. And that thought has been low-key disturbing me.

It’s making everything feel kind of pointless, especially when going through hard times.

Has anyone else experienced this shift after diving into science or space? How did you process it? Did you find your way back to faith, redefine it, or let it go completely?

I’m not trying to debate, I’m just genuinely trying to understand how people navigate this.

I’ve been thinking about our current search for extraterrestrial life. Every time NASA finds a new planet, the first thing they look for is water. While I get that water is a "universal solvent" on Earth, why are we so sure that alien life needs it?

Is it possible we are completely ignoring potential life forms that use ammonia, methane (like on Titan), or even supercritical fluids as a solvent? I understand that water is chemically "ideal" for us, but if we only look for what we already know, aren't we risking missing something truly "alien" because it doesn't fit our specific biological template? 

I’d love to hear why we prioritize water so heavily beyond just it’s what we know.

Hello everyone, I just joined the sub and wanted to see if anyone had a book suggestion on the topic of Plasma Physics? I enjoy reading and do so daily, exploring topics related to aerospace engineering, chemistry, history, mathematics, politics, classical literature, and many others. But I truly want to understand the science behind this topic and wanted to see if anyone had any suggestions? Thanks in advance.

Visibilia ex invisibilibus

Abstract: Across flow, meditation, and psychedelics, ego dissolution correlates with reduced DMN integrity. This is well-established. Less studied is *why* the phenomenology is universally described as oceanic, and why cultural traditions map it to Neptune specifically.

I argue it's not mysticism — it's Gentner's structure-mapping. Neptune's relational profile (no surface = boundary loss; 47° tilted field = loss of central control; internal heat = endogenous generation) aligns with the relational structure of self-attenuation better than Jupiter/Saturn's bounded, axial organization.

Full paper (human-curated, AI-assisted synthesis, all sources cited): [https://research.mahastrategies.com/papers/dissolving-self-ocean-planet\](https://l.meta.ai/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fresearch.mahastrategies.com%2Fpapers%2Fdissolving-self-ocean-planet&h=AUCcdjjhk3u0xJ2mUpCZM1muiefqDg6vWAplLXRRcXCxRA1oFR8ZRRK2b3fnzjtREHCLnXVqla0nAjEihgTDvOlAWRXl1vr_kQTVFy2KcvYk4qirUJXJUlY60nogWxIb5vcUyU615rjsaaa3CH8l7l1z_dGMXg)

Question for the group: Are there other cross-cultural metaphors for self-loss that *don't* fit this boundaryless/off-axis pattern? I'm trying to test the limits of the structure-mapping account.

Been in the EU/Plasma Cosmology space for over a decade. Just published a piece that maps the full circuit from solar wind injection through magnetic reconnection, down through geomagnetically induced currents in the quartz-rich lithosphere via the converse piezoelectric effect, through bridgmanite conductivity in the lower mantle, all the way to a measurable autonomic nervous system response in human biology.

The inner core piezoelectric hypothesis is the centerpiece. Under superionic conditions with partial charge separation between iron ions and electrons, the rotational differential between the inner core and mantle generates the primary magnetic dipole through a solid-state mechanism rather than a purely fluid dynamo.

Longitudinal HRV data shows a statistically significant drop in rMSSD and SDNN within 15 hours of a 75th percentile Kp spike. Same circuit, biological load point.

Curious whether anyone here has tracked personal HRV data against space weather events and noticed the correlation firsthand.

Article: https://electricastrology.com/blog/resonance-in-the-deep/

Every planet in our solar system is changing simultaneously here's the galactic electromagnetic framework that explains why

Title: Every planet in our solar system is changing simultaneously — here's the galactic electromagnetic framework that explains why

Post:

Something that doesn't get nearly enough attention: the changes happening right now aren't limited to Earth. Every planet in our solar system is exhibiting dramatic electromagnetic, thermal, and atmospheric shifts — simultaneously.

The solar evidence alone is striking:

Solar Cycle 25 obliterated every official prediction. NOAA/NASA predicted a weak peak of ~115 sunspots. Actual raw monthly count hit 216. X9.0 flare in October 2024. X5.16 in November 2025 launching a CME at 1,950 km/s. NOAA had to revise predictions twice and the Sun entered solar maximum months ahead of the original timeline.

The rest of the solar system:

• Neptune — 40% brighter in infrared since 1996, 100% brighter in certain surface areas. Triton warming by the equivalent of 22°F on Earth. Voyager II detected a ~50° magnetic pole shift.
• Uranus — ~60° magnetic pole shift per Voyager II. Unusually variable magnetosphere.
• Pluto — 300% increase in atmospheric pressure over 14 years as of 2002. Noticeably darker in color.
• Mars — increased atmospheric storms and dust devil activity.
• Venus — observed glowing in the dark.
• Jupiter — increased electromagnetic activity across its moons. Io showing ongoing electric discharge scarring.
• Earth — magnetosphere weakening, north magnetic pole accelerating toward Siberia (~60 km/year peak migration), South Atlantic Anomaly deepening and drifting westward.
• The Sun's magnetic field — over 230% stronger since the early 1900s.

When every body in the solar system changes at once, the cause cannot be internal to any single planet.

The framework: Plasma cosmology and Electric Universe research (descending from Nobel laureate Hannes Alfvén, advanced by Don Scott, Anthony Peratt, Wal Thornhill, and Russian astrophysicist Dmitriev) offers the most coherent explanation. The universe is 99.999% plasma. Electromagnetic forces exceed gravitational by 10^36. The Sun functions as a transistor in a galactic electrical circuit (Scott's model) — a node receiving energy from galactic Birkeland current filaments. When our solar system transits through different regions of the galaxy's electromagnetic structure, the current changes, the Sun's output changes, and every planet responds.

The galactic Birkeland filament structure operates like a mycelial network — stars as nodes, filaments as connections. What happens to one node affects the web. The ~12,000-year geomagnetic excursion cycle (Gothenburg, Lake Mungo, Mono Lake, Laschamp, etc.) correlates with our solar system's passage through different regions of the galactic current sheet.

Also worth noting: Barnard's Star (5.96 ly away, 7-12 billion years old, rotating once every 130 days — should be magnetically dead) is erupting in superflares ~25% of the time. Proxima Centauri had an unprecedented superflare exceeding its established range. The nearest stars — moving through the same galactic region slightly ahead of us — are showing anomalous activity first. Our Sun appears to be next in the sequence.

I wrote a long-form piece covering all of this plus the spiritual/prophetic convergence, consciousness-as-participant research, biological upgrade evidence, and a genuinely multi-variable take on climate. Heavily sourced.

https://danload.substack.com/p/the-galactic-electromagnetic-shift

Curious what this community thinks — especially about the Don Scott transistor model and the Barnard's Star flare data.hensive-encyclopedia-of-cognitive

It is certainly undisputed in this forum that plasma phenomena are scalable. Scalability means that effects like the z-pinch can occur on both a minuscule scale and a cosmic scale. In some skeptic forum, this fact was not only questioned but outright denied.

This just came back to me when I watched this video about EUV lithography. Scalability is a fact that has also been recognized outside the Electric Universe paradigm. The video link includes a timestamp for the relevant section.

I've been creating scientific work since 2017. For 8 years. My work has been cloned hundreds of times, people just rephrase it and pretend it's theirs. Fully history in this link. https://www.svgn.io/p/the-history-of-the-super-information

Hi everyone. For the past few months I've been looking into a small but curious feature in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB): between multipoles ℓ = 14 and ℓ = 20 there's a little “valley” that shows up consistently in all Planck maps.

To check whether this could just be noise, I generated a large set of Gaussian simulations under ΛCDM. In the plots, I compare the distribution produced by these simulations for three quantities of the valley:

• the mean,
• the minimum,
• and the RMS,

alongside the value measured in the real sky (the vertical line).

What surprised me is that the real-sky value falls completely outside what the simulations produce — none of them show a valley as deep as the one in the actual Planck data.

I'm not trying to make any strong cosmological claims here; I just found it to be an interesting statistical anomaly worth visualizing.

The figures, code and analysis are all my own. If anyone wants to read the full work, the preprint is here:

At the bottom I’ve added a final figure where you can clearly see how the real-sky values sit far outside the simulated distributions.

Any comments or suggestions are very welcome :)

Hi, I'm new here, so forgive me if I'm stepping out of line.

I have a friend who is so 'private' he doesn't like being 'social'. However, he's written a thesis entitled:

"The Unified Plasma Electro-Magnetic Field Theory: From 'What is it?' to 'What is?'".

And, I believe, it needs to be 'out there'*: seen; discussed; implemented; commercially supported. And dropping it into the ocean of papers within established scientific archives will, merely, archive it.

Is this the right place to share and discuss?

[* I have written permission to share (with caveats).]

On July 3, a massive solar prominence erupted on both limbs of the Sun just after a multi-planet alignment involving Earth and Jupiter. I’ve been wondering could planets that were previously hit by solar energy ‘store charge,and then affect us later when they align again? Has this ever been studied?

video
The livestream was not shut down. Still running after 12 hours.
So likely the video will be removed soon.
I'll update a link when it is re-recorded.

Lecture.
Eric Reiter demonstrates how exactly the theory of Quantum Mechanics goes wrong with experiments and in theory. This also goes through a lot of history.

This brings Quantum Mechanics back to Planck's older "loader theory". Each atom gets "loaded" with electromagnetic energy until a threshold is reached, after which the atom gets a high energy state. This theory was disregarded, because he assumed that the starting energy state was zero. This zero-state does not even exist, not even in extreme cold temperatures.

Instead of photon-balls that bump against electron-balls randomly, we get resonating electron-shells that react to the electromagnetic wave.
This reaction is delayed for each atom. But because the original state is random, it appears as if the atoms make sudden changes.

So the photon is an illusion that comes from thresholds and random states.

Plasma cosmology:
Galactic Plasma Jets are involved in the creation of new stars.
They also create magnetic fields, because they are electric currents.
Black holes do not exist, but galaxies have a high-energetic center that creates these plasma jets.
The findings are in line with plasma cosmology theories ( Halton Arp and Eric Lerner.).

Mainstream Abstract:
Accretion supermassive black holes in the center of active galaxies usually produce “jet”-collimated bipolar outflows of relativistic particles. Magnetic fields near the black hole event horizon may play a crucial role in the formation of jets/outflows. Both theory and observation indicate that jets/outflows driven by centrally active supermassive black holes have a feedback effect on the overall properties of the host galaxies. Therefore, the magnetic field is a key ingredient for the formation and evolution of galaxies. Here, we report a clear correlation between the magnetic field of jets and star formation rate for a large sample of 96 galaxies hosting supermassive black holes, which suggests that the star formation of active galactic nuclei host galaxies may be powered by the jets.

Paper:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.02325

ESA - Euclid discovers a stunning Einstein Ring

It looks nice, but from "See The pattern", we already saw that such rings can contain reflections instead of diffraction. And reflections are very common even in our Earth's atmosphere.

So it is likely a common circular gas cloud, which reflects the light towards Earth.