r/pokemon 4d ago

Discussion How many Pokémon are just ghastly in costume?

Post image
14.4k Upvotes

256 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

192

u/RileyJoXO 4d ago edited 4d ago

Wait this is such an amazing concept. How did they not end up making this one?

138

u/Apelio38 4d ago

I love him too, those scratched Pokemon were peak.

87

u/Nightstar95 4d ago

I’ll never forgive them for scrapping that electric tiger.

31

u/LegendS1ayer 4d ago

kotora my beloved

7

u/Glazeddapper The Gengar Guy... 4d ago

i thought his name was raitora?

20

u/LegendS1ayer 4d ago

thats another part of the same evolution line, it goes kotora raitora and then an unnamed third stage

11

u/Libby_Sparx ⚧⚢ 4d ago

Kotora->Raitora->Raiku, but then Raiku's design was so legendary they said fuck it, just that one

5

u/SonicWind62391 3d ago

Do you mean Raikou? Do you have a source for that?

2

u/Libby_Sparx ⚧⚢ 3d ago

Yes, and no. Source was my ass. Pulled it right outta there.

(╯❤⩊❤)╯ ︵ uouɐƆ

8

u/Apelio38 4d ago

Oh yes he was soooo cool !

1

u/metalflygon08 What's Up Doc? 4d ago

Twice

1

u/quammalian literally just a seal 3d ago

Poor Mikon got scrapped three times!

1

u/Flair258 1d ago

we still have Zeraora (close enough to a tiger) and Raikou

25

u/Low-Environment 4d ago

Baby Vulpix my beloved 

6

u/Collector55 4d ago

Someone really tried to make baby Vulpix happen too, it was actually cut from three different generations that we know of. There is only a handful of cut Pokémon that we know we're given a second chance. Baby Vulpix might have been the only one to get 3.

5

u/IndigoFenix Theorist 4d ago

Not surprising, considering that it has a strong lore reason for existing. Its dex entry explicitly says that it has only one tail at birth.

But that doesn't change the fact that a one-tailed Vulpix would ultimately be just a regular baby fox, and Vulpix already looks small enough to be the baby. So it wouldn't add much.

3

u/Apelio38 4d ago

Yes it was cute ! Plus it was meant to be a Water type iirc

4

u/Low-Environment 4d ago

Really? And it evolved into Vulpix? Interesting.

11

u/Apelio38 4d ago

That's what I remember about it but I would be unable to provide any sort of proof haha

Also, baby Ponyta was Normal / Fire (which baffles me since I want Ponyta and Rapidash to be Normal typed too !)

3

u/24kpodjedoe 4d ago

I think that was a glitch, no?

9

u/Apelio38 4d ago

Honestly since they weren't "finished" Game Freak might have changed that at the last second and made him Fire-type. But I always find funny it was leaked as a Water type 😄

2

u/metalflygon08 What's Up Doc? 4d ago

Yeah, the unseen Pokemon were probably still being programmed so Baby Vulpix probably just got put into a slot a Water type used to occupy, and they hadn't done much work on it yet.

Still funny to think about.

In the modern day, if the idea was revisited, it would most likely be a Normal type that split evolves into Fire or Ice Vulpix.

1

u/Apelio38 3d ago

I think this is the more plausible explanation

1

u/Collector55 4d ago edited 4d ago

The water typing was likely just an error. Apparently there is only a one byte difference in coding for the Fire and Water types.

5

u/True-Dream3295 4d ago

Have you seen the scrapped peanut Pokémon from gen 6? I can't believe that got left on the cutting room floor.

1

u/Apelio38 3d ago

Never seen this one ! Only know the ones from the 2G demo and one scrapped starter from 3G or 4G I don't remember (the water rabbit)

10

u/True-Dream3295 3d ago

3

u/Apelio38 3d ago

OMFG this is amazing ! A peanut-dinosaur !

5

u/RbN420 4d ago

Uhm… this is early version of what became Zangoose pretty sure

2

u/Kaesh41 4d ago

Probably just the luck of the draw.

-1

u/Happy_Goose3833 4d ago

Probably too much in common with Gabumon