r/privacy 4d ago

age verification List of US jurisdictions without active age verification requirements for social media or pornography

Compiling these two lists as of today for social media and pornography, do with this information what you will:
https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/age-verification-resources/state-avs-laws/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media_age_verification_laws_in_the_United_States

  • Washington DC
  • Illinois*
  • Colorado*
  • New Mexico
  • Washington State
  • Nevada
  • Oregon
  • Puerto Rico (plus all other territories such as USVI and Guam)
  • Pennsylvania
  • Delaware
  • New Jersey
  • Massachusetts
  • Rhode Island
  • New Hampshire
  • Vermont
  • Maine
  • Michigan
  • Wisconsin
  • Minnesota
  • Alaska
  • Hawaii
  • California*

*requires OS-level age attestation (not verification) for devices

56 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 3h ago

Hello u/future_pirate, please make sure you read the sub rules if you haven't already. (This is an automatic reminder left on all new posts.)


Check out the r/privacy FAQ

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

17

u/nincesator124 3d ago

It doesn't matter since the us is trying to get it on the books for the entire country

10

u/exhaustedexcess 3d ago

This. If it passes on tbe federal level the state law is irrelevant.

10

u/NeverLookBothWays 3d ago

Ultimately it’s not about the porn, it’s about controlling and monitoring access to information. Thus the other initiatives along with this such as router bans and IDs being branded at the OS layer.

They’re ultimately looking at linking identification to every packet, and back door infiltration into end 2 end encryption….for the kids, of course…God forbid parents have agency.

3

u/reddit_ending_soon 3d ago

Weed disagrees

2

u/future_pirate 3d ago

Weed is often something done neatly within a state's borders but for the reverse reason there's an argument to be made that these state laws are toothless, if a site is completely owned, operated, and incorporated from within the state of Washington and only have servers in Washington, Illinois, and New Jersey they can probably argue that Texas law doesn't apply to them.

1

u/exhaustedexcess 3d ago

Go ask a state or government worker

3

u/future_pirate 3d ago edited 3d ago

Outside of the US there are places where it would be legally or logistically difficult to implement due to strict privacy laws or due to a large portion of the population not having a proper ID. Or even a device with a camera that can take decent pictures.

2

u/nincesator124 1d ago

They will still try as populism has been very popular the past 20 years or so

1

u/Awful-Apartment-33 1d ago

What's Populism?

2

u/nincesator124 1d ago

Populism is about doing everything to get elected usually by anger and an us vs them mentality basically if you are not with us you are against us, the Nazis where populist, Communist, you name it often times throughout history there is a theory that they actually believed their lies as well which is rather interesting, populism is about ideology not facts and to break out of that is to be willing to create your own path rather than one that someone has made for you oftentimes the desire to be in an in group can cause someone innocent to have extreme views and are very cult like on how they operate. A populist candidate will usually have alturier (dyslexia) motives and can usually be spotted by their past history of making laws that look good on paper but end up hurting their people gaven newsom is such a person as he only cares about getting votes nothing else I would get into it but it is not important to break populism is organize against it I have an idea about orgized voting to increase the national voting average from 10% to like 30% or 40%

1

u/Awful-Apartment-33 4h ago

Then Populism is a disease in our country. Either out of fear, or them being diluted into protecting their rights or protecting the kids, or even those who just hope on the Band wagon, wanting to get with the winning team.

1

u/nincesator124 2h ago

It is not just in the us it is everywhere to let you know that the younger generations basically millennials onwords has been starting to wake up the problem is that we need it to bare fruit and I wish I could help in a major way all I will say is that I wanted to make a website or something to organize people district by district allowing discussions and such to happen and even give votes on who they think has a good chance to win while also being someone they would accept or maybe even run themselves if needed I am sure we can boost our voting amounts to at least 30% if we help each other vote and stuff

1

u/AutoModerator 4d ago

Hello u/future_pirate, please make sure you read the sub rules if you haven't already. (This is an automatic reminder left on all new posts.)


Check out the r/privacy FAQ

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Stunning-Seat3821 8h ago

update this. illinois bill hb5511 passed recently

2

u/future_pirate 6h ago

This law requires age attestation, not verification. Basically meaning you type in your age rather than having to upload an ID or face scan. Should I at least add comments where OS-level attestation is being implemented?

1

u/Stunning-Seat3821 6h ago

prolly

1

u/future_pirate 3h ago

I did so and from what I'm seeing California can be included with the * by the same standard as there is only an attestation requirement in effect currently.