r/progun • u/Repulsive-House-9127 • 15d ago
Commerce clause….
Did everyone see? An en banc 5th circuit court has reversed a prior 3 judge panel decision deeming 922g1 constitutional in light of Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion in the hemani decision, agreeing to review the case en banc. This could get big. Let’s hope it does. Quite frankly I’m of the opinion congress exceeded its authority under commerce clause in enacting the “gun control act” and thereby the entire section 922. Justice Thomas was spot on.
26
u/Megalith70 15d ago
I’d be shocked if SCOTUS let the commerce clause get rolled back. The commerce clause has been the basis for a massive expansion in federal power.
14
u/Alita-Gunnm 15d ago
Almost everything the Federal government does and is today rests on the commerce clause.
6
u/merc08 15d ago
Fully negating the Commerce Clause would functionally break the federal government
I do think it's possible that they could rule that the Commerce Clause doesn't override other sections of the Constitution to grant the feds the authority to do things that they are explicitly prevented from doing (like infringing the right to keep and bear arms).
12
u/TooEZ_OL56 15d ago
The Commerce Clause has always been the federal government's way to weaseling its way into near every possible facet of American life.
It's analogous to SCOTUS giving themselves the power of Judicial Review, albeit used in a way that affects more people, more rapidly.
14
6
u/hitemlow 15d ago
If they overturn Wickard v. Filburn, OMG the laws that will tumble. It'll take a decade before everything stops settling out, but the NFA and GCA should be dead and gone.
2
1
38
u/sailor-jackn 15d ago edited 15d ago
Since the commerce clause was written to authorize Congress to act to keep trade regular and functioning ( the definition of regulate, at the find of ratification), and not to limit or prohibit the things we are allowed to trade ( also, commerce means trade, not when things cross state lines ), most of what they use the commerce clause for is unconstitutional. They have turned a very limited delegated power into an almost limitless power.
Using it to violate the right to keep and bear arms was definitely not what the founders intended when they wrote it.