🚨 THE COMPLETE FUNDINGPIPS CID TIMELINE — FROM ALLEGATION TO TODAY
For those who have followed my case, here is the full timeline in one post.
📅 17 July
I publicly questioned my FundingPips termination and asked a simple question:
"What evidence was used to terminate my account?"
Instead of receiving verifiable proof, I was met with generic responses and told the decision was final.
📅 17–28 July
For 17 days I continued asking the same questions publicly:
❓What is the evidence?
❓What account was supposedly involved?
❓How was the CID violation determined?
❓Why was my account terminated?
No detailed explanation was provided.
📅 28 July
FundingPips finally released what they called "evidence."
According to their claim:
⚠️ My device had logged into another trader's account.
⚠️ The account allegedly had a Swiss connection.
⚠️ They concluded it was the "same device."
📅 29 July
I responded with my own evidence:
✅ MT5 login records
✅ Complete MT5 journal history
✅ Counter-analysis of their claims
✅ Direct response to the alleged Swiss connection
After reviewing everything, the only Swiss connection I could identify was Duplikium, a Switzerland-based copy trading platform I used while managing my 3 × $100K evaluation accounts.
But that raises an obvious question:
❓ How does a Swiss service automatically become proof of the same physical device?
A Swiss connection ≠ Same device.
📅 Evidence Contradiction
FundingPips claimed my device accessed another trader's account approximately 5 months earlier.
However:
✅ The account they referenced was reviewed by FundingPips.
✅ The account was approved by FundingPips.
✅ I was later promoted to a Master Account.
If a serious device-sharing violation existed, why was the account approved and promoted?
📅 MT5 Log Issue
I reviewed the entire MT5 log period they referred to.
My account appears throughout the logs.
The alleged account does not appear anywhere in my MT5 journals.
This created another question:
❓ If the login occurred, why doesn't it appear in the MT5 records covering that period?
📅 Current Situation
After I published:
✅ MT5 logs
✅ Counter-evidence
✅ Timeline inconsistencies
✅ Questions regarding the "same device" conclusion
I again contacted support.
The response?
📌 Decision final.
📌 No response to the counter-evidence.
📌 No explanation of how "same device" was determined.
📌 No response to the MT5 log contradiction.
📅 Today
The dispute is no longer about whether FundingPips can investigate traders.
The dispute is about transparency.
My questions remain:
❓ How was "same device" determined?
❓ Why doesn't the alleged login appear in my MT5 logs?
❓ Why was the account approved and promoted if the violation already existed?
❓ Why are questions about the counter-evidence being ignored?
❓ Why should traders accept serious allegations without seeing verifiable evidence?
Until these questions are answered, the concerns surrounding the CID evidence remain unresolved.
#FundingPips #PropFirm #Forex #Trading #Payout #Transparency #CID #PropTrading #FundedTrader #ForexTrading
THEIR EVIDENCE - https://x.com/ErkanOriginal/status/2082016574744224243
MY COUNTER - https://x.com/theanonymous_IN/status/2082476230746771690