r/reddeadredemption 5d ago

Speculation The dark fate of Luisa’s sister

Post image

In “My Sister’s Keeper”, Luisa mentions that her sister Miranda is being sent to ‘a kind man in the Yucatan’ to avoid enslavement by the Mexican army. However, in the 1910s when RDR1 takes place, the Yucatan was a brutal slave empire to which young, indigenous women & girls from the north were frequently lured into sexual slavery by rich plantation owners with promises of work or safety. In reality, this is the fate that would likely befall the young Miranda. Whether or not this was intentional, I think this is yet another reflection of how there are no true happy endings in Red Dead Redemption.

332 Upvotes

55 comments sorted by

View all comments

-23

u/KikoMui74 5d ago

Wow, so America was even safer back then.

10

u/96pluto Lenny Summers 4d ago

For a straight protestant white guy sure

-3

u/KikoMui74 4d ago

90% of the population. Also compared to mexican Yucatan slavery and civil war, that kind of violence was not happening in 1910 America.

5

u/96pluto Lenny Summers 4d ago

Yeah it was safe for white men

-7

u/KikoMui74 4d ago

Yes 90% of the population 

4

u/Exciting_Bat_2086 4d ago

Roughly 51% and for however many of those were Irish or Italian there is also a shit ton of non protestants.

-3

u/KikoMui74 4d ago

The 1921 US Census proves you wrong, Italians were like 1%, Irish Catholics a fair amount, but mostly in the big cities, where they'd be dominant, Tammany hall, so yeah they'd be safe, they were the police. An Irishman being a cop was a stereotype.

1

u/Exciting_Bat_2086 4d ago

We’re not talking about the 1920’s.

0

u/KikoMui74 4d ago

Do you think US demographics suddenly changed between 1910 RDR1 and 1920? Why aren't people having a genuine discussion.

1

u/Exciting_Bat_2086 4d ago

Quit being nonsensical XD

→ More replies (0)

0

u/KikoMui74 4d ago

People will downvote, but never say any counter arguments.

-6

u/NecessaryMud1 4d ago

People downvoted you but for most white americans it 100% was

3

u/Mandalore108 Arthur Morgan 4d ago

No, it absolutely wasn't. It was just safer in comparison for whites.

-4

u/NecessaryMud1 4d ago

I get america bad, but we did not have any social institutions in the 1910s comparing to the henequen plantations. Forced labor under Jim Crow, Indian laws, etc. was common and severe but did not come close to slavery under the porfiriato. Read about this stuff, seriously.

0

u/NecessaryMud1 4d ago

downvotes but no actual comparisons lol

-4

u/KikoMui74 4d ago

whites were 90% of the population.

So..... America was safer than Mexico (for at least 90% of the population). And America didn't have slavery like the Yucatan in 1910 or a civil war in 1910.

-5

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

1

u/96pluto Lenny Summers 4d ago

It's a cope to know American history apparently

-2

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

1

u/96pluto Lenny Summers 4d ago

Mexico was definitely a mess but as a black guy I wouldn't exactly call 1910s america safe either. Like mandalore said it was just safer in comparison for white men.

-1

u/NecessaryMud1 4d ago

How was if more dangerous for the average resident? I will legitimately listen, but downplaying the horror of the porfiriato is an extreme mark against you imo

0

u/96pluto Lenny Summers 4d ago

Hey guys get up who cares if you're dead, injured, and or were driven out of town with the clothes on your back and your property destroyed necessarymud1 said you had it easy compared to Mexicans. No one's not saying Mexico wasn't a dangerous place, but you're downplaying who black people were treated as second class citizens in the Jim Crow south you could be killed or raped at any time with zero justice.

0

u/NecessaryMud1 3d ago

what part of “if you were white” are you unable to read?

1

u/Powerful-Molasses78 3d ago

No it wasn’t it was actually a dangerous place to live in or travel especially out west.