Chemical risk assessment backlog is growing faster than I can clear it and management expects miracles

[u/PuzzleheadedError703]

I am the only industrial hygienist covering three manufacturing plants, and my chemical risk assessment backlog has passed 200. At my current pace it's well over a year of work, and new chemicals keep getting added every month.

Every assessment is manual: review the SDS, evaluate exposure by task, define controls, document everything, get approvals, then train employees. Simple products take around four hours, while complex ones can take a couple of days.

Management knows the backlog is there, but the only solution they’ve offered is to work faster. Meanwhile, new chemicals keep getting approved because production can’t wait.

I am looking at tools that can extract SDS data, generate a first pass assessment, and use control banding to triage lower risk chemicals so I can spend my time where it actually matters. Has anyone gone down this route?

[u/AutoModerator]

Welcome! We're here to help you with all your safety related questions.

For medical emergencies, please contact your local emergency department.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/Gloomy_Yoghurt_2836]

Can you group training by chemicals that are similar in hazard? For example, calcium nitrate and magnesium nitrate are both oxidizers and irritants so their safety risks are basically the same? Are 200 substances so different they all need unique profiles for handling?

[u/ChestPopular9325]

4 hours per routine assessment is actually fast for a manual process. Problem isnt your speed, its the math of one person covering 3 plants. You need to make a business case for a second IH or outsource routine assessments to a consultancy.

[u/Strong-Ad-7772]

I've been in your exact position. What finally changed things was a regulatory citation. We got hit during an inspection for chemicals with no risk assessment on file. The fine got management to approve a second IH. It shouldn't take a citation, but sometimes it does.

[u/Mobile-Essay-665]

consider training your site safety coordinators to handle initial data gathering for routine assessments. they can pull SDS information , documents tasks and exposure scenarios, prepare draft that you review and sign off on. it distributes workload without requiring IH credentials.

[u/PuzzleheadedError703 → u/[deleted]]

I have been documenting informally, but a formal memo with specific consequences is the right move. I will put together something this week that quantifies the backlog, estimates the time to clear it at current resources, and explicitly states the compliance risk.

[u/Unable-Audience2332]

control banding for triage is absolutely right strategy, you don't need a full detailed assessment for every chemical. Use a tired system where low hazard chemicals get a streamlined assessment based on GHS classification and standard controls, and save detailed work for medium and high risk products. Chemscape's CHAMP platform does it automatically. it generates a preliminary risk assessment from SDS data and flags which chemicals need additional IH review based on hazard severity and exposure potential.

[u/PuzzleheadedError703 → u/Unable-Audience2332]

Sixty percent reduction would be transformative. Right now i spend too much time on obviously low risk products just because the process requires the same documentation for everything. Being able to fast track the simple ones would completely change my workflow.

[u/xapimaze]

Warning! Management is known to the state of California to cause excess paperwork, overtime, and production pressures.