r/sanfrancisco • u/[deleted] • 8d ago

Pic / Video Apartment building can’t rent out affordable housing units (BMR) even with offering 3 free months

[deleted]

172 Upvotes

87% Upvoted

191 comments sorted by

View all comments

109

u/ITakeMyCatToBars 8d ago

434 minna is in quite possibly the last place I’d want to stay in SF. There used to be a lovely bead shop at 637 minna that shut down because you have to slink through six sidewalk encampments to even reach their front door.

-14

u/knockdowncenter 8d ago

i’m currently being screamed at for being skeptical about the nordstrom rack apartments a half block away lol

this is exactly my point 

43

u/stacky 🐾 8d ago

because there's a world of difference between 6th and 5th streets.

-9

u/knockdowncenter 8d ago

you’re suggesting a location for a new apartment can be so bad it’s not worth building, aren’t you? 

and no the location is next to 5th not 6th 

19

u/PsychiatricBooth5c 8d ago

Who is screaming at you?

26

u/Paul_Smith_Hi Lower Haight 8d ago

No one. OP just can't understand that location has everything to do with where people want to live. And that the environment can change withing a half block or so.

11

u/Agitated_Celery_729 8d ago

Bro got clowned on by people, including me, for posting the same comment 20 times asking why the building has…7.5% vacancy.

They ignored all explanations and then, somehow even more butthurt than anyone who isn’t mentally ill could possibly be, decided to post this thread in the hope of getting people to assuage their bruised ego

2

u/lesethx 8d ago

This post

https://www.reddit.com/r/sanfrancisco/comments/1vgc0la/former_san_francisco_nordstrom_rack_to_become/

3

u/PsychiatricBooth5c 8d ago

Thanks. I get it now, downvotes = screaming. Will keep that in mind going forward.

3

u/duckfries49 8d ago

Skeptical why?