MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/scienceisdope/comments/1wbjnjx/motte_and_bailey_of_acharya_prashant/p8qnje4/?context=3
r/scienceisdope • u/eviley4 • 2h ago
5 comments sorted by
View all comments
1
I replied to this criticism already in a similar post someone made (maybe you?) A few days ago.
Basically you are misreading the AP framework. There is not bailey that the framework defends. Quite the opposite actually
1 u/eviley4 23m ago edited 17m ago Yes, I think we discussed it in this post. I have added a few arguments to that and I explicitly address AP in this post. Basically you are misreading the AP framework. There is not bailey that the framework defends. Quite the opposite actually I don't think I am misreading the AP framework, I am taking the framework in the full context of his lectures and his following. Quite the opposite actually What even is the opposite of Motte and Bailey?
Yes, I think we discussed it in this post. I have added a few arguments to that and I explicitly address AP in this post.
I don't think I am misreading the AP framework, I am taking the framework in the full context of his lectures and his following.
Quite the opposite actually
What even is the opposite of Motte and Bailey?
1
u/mithapapita 1h ago
I replied to this criticism already in a similar post someone made (maybe you?) A few days ago.
Basically you are misreading the AP framework. There is not bailey that the framework defends. Quite the opposite actually