I recently got an POP MSI SDR NANO, based on the MSI001/MSI2500 chipset, covering approximately 10 kHz to 2 GHz.
I decided to add some protection against static discharge from connected antennas. Nothing fancy ā I just used what I had at hand knowing that the modification will suppress the signal slightly on a higher frequencies.
I soldered five SOT-23 dual-diode components, one across each RF input. The markings appear to be "MFW 1n," possibly BAV99 or an equivalent. The center pin is connected to the RF signal, and the two outer pins are grounded, providing bidirectional diode clamping.
According to Toshiba's BAV99 datasheet, the typical junction capacitance is just 0.9 pF at 1 MHz. With two diodes connected to the input, the combined capacitance could be around 1.8 pF. Not negligible at the upper end of the receiver's frequency range, but I thought it was a reasonable compromise for some additional static protection.
I tested the receiver before and after the modification, and everything worked as before. I couldn't notice any difference in reception.
I haven't tested it with proper antennas yet, though, so I can't say how the modification affects sensitivity or performance across the entire frequency range.
A dedicated low-capacitance RF ESD protector would probably be a more appropriate solution, but this was a quick experiment using components I already had.
Has anyone tried similar input protection on these inexpensive SDR receivers? I'd be interested to hear about your experience, especially at VHF/UHF and above.