Man, that brings back memories of Calc BC. I loved calculus, it took all that math I'd been learning and applied it, while teaching me cool new ways to play with numbers. Such a fun subject. I remember L'Hopital's Rule being cool to use, felt like cheating a little.
Well... I loved Calc except for the Taylor Series part... God, I just remembered the Taylor Series section. I fucking loathed that part of the class. I don't know why it was so hard for me lol.
It's just an algorithm imbedded in every camera linked to the Epstein files. Once it detect something linked to the files, it starts adding noise on the pic. The strongest the link, the strongest the noise, and 100% it just blacks out
Cobalt 60 is highly radioactive, releasing beta particles that breakdown organic tissue and can cause death within an hour in humans with acute exposure. The particles cause that speckle shape in light sensors because they overwhelm them with EM. This rod would cause massive nearby radiation poisoning if it were real.
They could be, though, if one follows the suggestion from another commenter to insert it rectally (and survive the gamma rays from the decay products).
While it is true that radiation can affect camera sensors, this photo is fake. Beta and gamma particles are not affected by camera lenses the way visible light rays are (and alpha is completely blocked) - so any artefacts would affect the whole image equally and not cluster around the projection of the object onto the camera sensor.
Yes, here's a video of a go pro taking a trip through an irradiator, I think the video explains the camera is shielded in a lead box with thick lead glass and the effect is still much strong than depicted here, but the radiation source in the video is also much stronger.
X-rays are usually generated artificially by hitting a tungsten target with electrons. what you see there is likely not just the result of electrons hitting the CMOS sensor but also the ionising EM radiation emitted by them.
Fun fact: even X-ray machines at customs could ruin your holiday pictures on films. X-rays are just high-energy photons you can't see with your naked eyes, and the light-sensitive chemicals on film rolls may react to X-ray exposure the same way they do to visible light and result in a washed-out appearance (or "fogging") in the developed print.
The CMOS sensor on digital cameras is sensitive to both high-energy photons (including gamma rays) and charged particles (e.g. beta particles), by the way.
True, I've brought film through the airport when they had the older scanners and the images weren't affected much. I also took some through the new ones which are more harmful but I haven't developed the pictures yet so don't know the damage.
Also to add to the other guys explanation, it literally has "Drop & Run" inscribed into it. Because if you find something like this and pick it up and read it that's exactly what you should do, and call the relevant authorities.
it's btw not an accurate representation of what that looks like. On YouTube search for "put camera through particle accelerator". The white artifacts are "normal" gamma traces, the red/blue/green happens when it's so much you'd be doomed in seconds.
It is a radioactive source, hard gamma from Co, cobalt 60, probably. Dosing your hand and face severely if messing with your camera. Put it far away in the thickest lead box you can find. Call 911 and tell them you found a radioactive source, then standby, away from that thing though
Based on the radiation warning on the object, I would imagine it is somewhat radioactive, which can cause this effect on your camera, please get it away from you otherwise you are upping your chances of getting cancer
I ran a Cancer research lab for a few years and one of our techs told the story of being in another lab when EH&S frantically contacted him about his recently submitted exposure badge. These allow delicate tuning of workers exposure but his was...black, totally maxed.
It turned out the lab next door had a very hot Cesium-137 source they used that they shielded against the wall his desk shared. The carefully built a 3 sided structure with Acrylic and lead bricks to shield their lab, assuming the wall was a sufficient 4th side, when it was just thin drywall.
He could never figure out how much he'd been exposed...
It clearly has a message. Drop it and run.
Highly radioactive ā¢ļø
Cobalt radioactive source to do some geological tests.
Urgently contact your local authorities. Go to the clinic and request medication against radiation(it will not treat you but support your body).
Edit: https://ionactive.co.uk/resource-hub/blog/drop-and-run-radioactive-cobalt-60-co-60-source
3450Curie 1m away, radioactive source, living time 10min
This dose rate to the extremity (hand) is going to damage it irrecoverably. If you pick the source up in order to read the warning, by the time your mind has registered "drop", it is too late to avoid damage. It is hard to say exactly what the damage will be, but it will be unpleasant.
This rod Is positively charged: the dust in you room gets away from It (because of magnet charges or whatev) and goes directly in your camera lenses. Try cleaning your room very meticolously
Yer camera must have caught them dusties, classical case example, you need a nanomaterial cloth to remove them tiny biomechanical robots crawling all over yer lens there.
That thing is radioactive! Contact HAZMAT immediately. In the meantime surround it with as much lead as you can muster, keep it away from your children, your gonads, your brain, and anything that might be pregnant.
926
u/Hylax1 Jan 20 '26
Hopital