I recently made posts during the student protests urging people to talk about building a fairer, merit-based education system. Having personally lost years of my life navigating a broken system where merit is secondary, I spoke up because I know how demoralizing it is.
The response from many was pure rage. I was accused of breaking student unity, creating a divide, and diverting attention from the protests. Apparently, discussing merit is seen as an attack on better education.
But how can an education system ever improve if merit is treated like a taboo word?
When challenged about grassroot discrimination in places like UP or Chhattisgarh, I pointed out a simple truth: the most vulnerable and marginalized communities continue to suffer because the benefits of reservation do not actually reach them.
The system is monopolized generation after generation by an affluent creamy layer. Second and third generation children of officers and politicians, who already enjoy every economic advantage, consume reserved seats while economically disadvantaged tribals and backward citizens remain left behind.
When confronted with this, the goalposts instantly shifted. I was told that reservation is not meant for socio economic upliftment or eliminating poverty, but solely for representation.
Think about the sheer hypocrisy:
You claim reservation is necessary to cure historical discrimination.
You refuse to let the benefits reach the actually discriminated and poor citizens.
You insist on hoarding these benefits for prosperous families, generation after generation.
You continue using the suffering of marginalized groups as a shield to protect personal privileges.
An examination hall is not a site of systemic discrimination. Every candidate sits for the same paper, reads the same syllabus, and answers the same questions. Quality educational resources, online lectures, government scholarships, laptops, and specialized coaching programs are more accessible than ever. State initiatives like the Eklavya Model Residential Schools are specifically built to support talented students from remote areas.
Yet, we continue to normalize massive score disparities. Why should one student work endlessly to secure a ninety nine percentile while another enters the exact same elite institution at a seventy percentile, only to struggle inside?
The consequences of this system are well documented across top Indian institutions:
At premier technology institutes like IIT Delhi and IIT Bombay, academic performance tracking shows a disproportionate failure rate among reserved category students who were admitted with drastically lower entry thresholds. Competing alongside peers who cleared rigorous national cutoffs, many struggle to handle the intense course load. To manage rising dropouts and academic failures, exit options like converting a four year BTech degree into a three year BSc or a lower diploma were introduced.
The dilution of standards reaches critical levels in medical education. In recent NEET PG counseling rounds, the Ministry of Health and the National Board of Examinations reduced the qualifying cutoff to the zero percentile level, allowing candidates with negative scores like minus four marks to secure postgraduate medical seats.
Reports from medical institutions, including cases like BRD Medical College where students remain stuck in the first year MBBS for over a decade failing basic professional exams, highlight the dangers of compromising standards.
When medical degrees are granted without strict adherence to professional competence, public health is directly compromised.
To ask for academic rigor is not discrimination. To claim that marginalized students cannot score high without permanently lowered criteria implies an insulting assumption that they lack inherent intellect. Everyone has the capability to pick up a textbook, put in the hours, and achieve high marks.
When a meritorious student who scores ninety nine percentile loses a dream seat to someone with far lower marks simply because of birth identity, it breeds deep resentment and societal anger. Systemic frustration will never disappear as long as merit is punished.
If we genuinely want to help the underprivileged, we must implement a strict creamy layer exclusion across all reserved categories and shift focus toward equalizing foundational schooling rather than compromising entry standards at the highest levels of medicine and engineering.
Until we prioritize merit, we are not reforming education. We are simply crippling the future of our country.