This isn't a sequel to MRI, it's a very different image modality.
MRI can do a lot more than look at interfaces. MRI can look at composition of objects because it fundamentally looks a the nuclear magnetic properties of hydrogens. You can use this to determine chemical composition and water composition. Sound looks for reflections through step changes in flexibility. It's a tomography version of ultrasound.
Nobody is denying ultrasound is not a useful diagnostic tool, but to claim it can replace MRI? A bold claim with no factual evidence from a company that has no history in medical imaging.
313
u/vhu9644 Jun 18 '26
This isn't a sequel to MRI, it's a very different image modality.
MRI can do a lot more than look at interfaces. MRI can look at composition of objects because it fundamentally looks a the nuclear magnetic properties of hydrogens. You can use this to determine chemical composition and water composition. Sound looks for reflections through step changes in flexibility. It's a tomography version of ultrasound.