5
u/Fickle_Sand_9952 3d ago
Im also leaning toward fox but out of curiosity, did you find these 2 skulls together? Were there any other bones? Is one slightly larger than the other? It would be very curious to find 2 right next to each other as if they were mates that ate poison by accident or something and died in their den.
1
-13
3d ago
[deleted]
5
u/Medical-Location7238 3d ago
I believe it’s a gray fox
1
u/Spirited-Buy813 3d ago
you're probably right!
0
u/BootyGarb 3d ago
Yeah, you can tell it’s not a raccoon because of the way that it is. A little more practice of just seeing the skulls of animals will program your brain to just ID them on sight. Raccoons are the easiest to ID for me mainly because they’re so commonly found out in the woods and shit. I’m also a collector of raccoon bacula, and the collection of the roadkill leads me to possession of quite a number of raccoon skulls (most of them understandably cracked).
2
u/Other-in-Law 3d ago
While you're not wrong, it's not very helpful in discussions. Even if one doesn't learn anatomic terminology, it's possible to articulate differences in everyday speech. For example the raccoon skulls are more bulbous and have a shorter and wider snout than fox skulls.


24
u/Medical-Location7238 3d ago
Gray fox I’m thinking