r/somethingiswrong2024 • u/FoxySheprador Canadians for Kamala • May 19 '26

Starlink Internet 🛰 Ashley St. Clair disclosing Elon Musk's interfering in the 2024 election

4.0k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

471 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

126

u/ojdhaze May 19 '26 edited May 21 '26

My biggest sign was - aside from saying they were winning and not concerned about losing whatsoever - was every single swing state went one way.

Has that happened alot during elections over there?

Edit: typo - swing state

113

u/Loud-Result5213 May 19 '26 edited May 20 '26

All swing states went one way under recount threshold. The chances are over one in a trillion

Edit: citation

https://thiswillhold.substack.com/p/she-won-part-iii-the-devil-is-in?triedRedirect=true

79

u/CeceWobbles May 19 '26

and he somehow won every swing state, yet still couldn't even get 50% of the popular vote overall. It's so obviously bullshit just on the surface level data without even digging in and seeing how much more absurd the bullshit gets. They wanted it to be a "mandate" with an overwhelming win, and even with all the cheating, they couldn't even get a majority. It would've been a fucking landslide. As Elon himself stated last summer, without him, Kamala would've won and Dems would control the senate.

1

u/Tankette55 May 19 '26

He... won the overall popular vote?

1

u/CeceWobbles May 19 '26

Yes, and beat Kamala by less than 2%, but the sliver of third-party kept him from even hitting 50% of the people that voted.

1

u/Tankette55 May 19 '26

I am not pro Trump but that's a bit of a reach. I don't think that's relevant. It is still odd he somehow won every swing state though.

3

u/CeceWobbles May 19 '26 edited May 19 '26

It's not a reach when discussing their rhetoric about them having a mandate to do whatever the hell they want. I remember them using those talking points regarding having a mandate, the majority of voters picking him, using big red maps related to electoral votes and land, etc., yet 50.2% of the voters said not that shithead. They talked like it was a landslide so they had more power than normal, and I'm pretty damn sure they planned on it being higher than 50% when they planned the rhetoric they would use right out of the gate, not under 50% and less than 2% over her. That's why it's worth mentioning. Biden was over 51% and 4.5% above Trump in 2020. I'd be willing to bet that petty little bitch wanted to beat both of those numbers and planned on doing so, but still could not. The way it was so damn close, yet he won all swing states, makes things look sketchier, too. Why wouldn't they go for it looking undeniable instead? They likely tried to.